Just a few comments:
Your second trial completely failed to reproduce the finding of the first one about Sun/Uranus aspects.
You looked at 39 aspects and one of them was unusual in that it happens once in 66 samples. In a sample of 39 this will happen 45% of the time.
2 out of 39 was less likely than 2 percent. This happens 18% of the time with random data.
Basically you took a 100 sided dice, rolled it 39 times and got a 1 and a 2. Hardly unusual.
You've got a good sample size and yet no signal. If there was the kind of effect you wrote in your first posts it would have had to show up in this kind of sample pretty clearly. Indeed if the original trend held the result would have been significant to 1-3.3*10
-11.
Quote:
|
[...] If there were no planetary effect, these trend lines would either be flat or move in opposite directions.
|
I'm not sure I'm getting this right but you plotted the frequency in one subgroup (then on a different plot for the other subgroup) against the frequency (or rank in frequency) in the complete sample? If you did this you can't expect the trend lines to move to opposite directions. The aspect with the lowest frequency will have one of the lowest frequency in both subsamples. That's why it's lowest, it got unlucky twice. Same with the highest. You expect some aspects to get lucky twice and in turn you expect them to turn up in the upper right in both plots.
You don't expect flat lines either becouse the expected distribution is not uniform.