If no one is offering any objections ...

I declare the ISU and the EEP to be the mainstream. OK?

Consider the implications. All replies to Q&A would have to be from the ISU perspective.

It seems that the current membership is in a bind because I have made such rational and responsible speculation about the EEP and the ISU that no questions come to mind. This stuff is pure?

Lurkers, join the ISU with me. Sign up at BAUT (it’s free!), and post on my thread to let me know you are out there. If you want, I’ll make you official members of the ISU. I hate being alone in the ISU.

I’m asking for guesses as to what you think I will say are the size and energy of an EEP.

Put them in this format:

EEP average diameter = X.XX times 10-xx meters

EEP energy = X.XX times 10-xx joules

Note that the EEP always has positive energy. The electric charge is the energy density differential between two energy environments. The negative charge assigned to an electron is an energy differential between the EEPs that make up the electron and the low energy density surrounding the proton. Therefore the EEP has a positive energy value while the electron has a negative energy value for calculation purposes.

It is like money on a balance sheet. The debits are on the left and the credits are on the right, but just like a dollar is still a dollar, an EEP is still an EEP, .