05-May-2007, 03:20 AM
|
 |
Established Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,340
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Noonan
I am thinking here of the motion of the EEP into matter, and thinking in very broad terms at that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Noonan
Say for instance in a fluid situation the flow caused spin at a molecular level so that each particle of matter absorbed the EEP in a flow like spiral. The effect of multiple exits would be the equivalent of quantum spin which in turn if lined up correctly should correspond to greater rotations in the part we live in.
That is quantum spin linkes directly to the rotations of the planets and for that matter out to the galaxies.
Now with any fluid like flow there needs to be a return mechanism otherwise we get back to the "some supreme deity keeps replenishing it". Is it possible that there is a quantum entanglement effect where EEPs flow into matter and elswhere they flow out of it again.
It would mean a binary state of matter for the constant but dynamic state of the EEP. I don't know if this helps, but you are not alone in looking for answers. I think it must be great to be a world famous scientist rather like a master builder, there are many who can work on parts of a building but so few gifted enough to complete the task from design to foundation to finish all on their own resources.
Cheers Mike
|
Thank you Mike, you’re thinking outside the box and that is the sign of an innovator. Maybe I will get to the point that I can address spin in the ISU but right now, as you can tell, the bottom up process is just on the verge of the first attempt to quantify the EEP. It is a long road from there to quantum spin I guess, and once there, maybe then not so far to the formation of galaxies where the question of rotation may very well sort out to the ideas of the “flow” that you acknowledge as possible. But we won’t hold our breath ‘til then, now will we?
This thread would benefit from a few people like you reading every word from the beginning. Everything important about the ISU and the EEP is here on this thread, and the current status of the development of the bottom up process can be clearly ascertained. One solid debunking and the ISU would be over. Why are people stifling themselves when they could end this by revealing a fatal error? This stuff just keeps coming to me when no one sticks out their foot, you know what I mean?
Yet not one of the great posters, and there are many, has honored me with anything akin to a challenge of the content. Am I to believe that my clear presentation is flawless? I don’t think so. Am I to believe that everyone is just waiting for the values I promise to present before the questions begin? Call it intuition but I think there will be no questions at all. Your post is supportive though and I appreciate the input  and encourage you to read the whole thread and post some questions about the content  .
Last edited by Bogie; 05-May-2007 at 03:40 AM..
|