Quote:
Originally Posted by trinitree88
On thread Energy into mass?
Actually, energy can annihilate with 100% efficiency turning into mass as particle/antiparticle pairs. The intersection of electron positron pairs at LEP produces a transient photon that can produce the particle/antiparticle pairs. The proton/anti-proton collisions at Fermilab can also do this....first photon, then associated production of pairs. Even neutrino/antineutrino annihilations can turn 100% of the energy into mass. The stipulation must be that they are 180 degrees opposed at contact so that momenta are conserved in the pair production.
Now, to build the colliders and reach lots of beam,...that's inefficient as Bremstrahlung losses waste lots of energy....but individual events can be model children of conservation laws' hierarchy. As the minimal mass pair is the e+/ e-, with 511 kev/ c2 each, the photon must be 1,022 kev or 1.022 Mev. The problem here is the positron...it isn't going to last when it touches real mass, and you have touched on the real issue in cosmology....no theory can explain the presently observed excess of matter over antimatter. None. An excess of B mesons does not explain an excess of baryons (protons and neutrons ) over anti-baryons (antiprotons and antineutrons), nor does a single event in any run in any experiment ever explain the fact that there are just as many negatively charged electrons as there are positively charged protons to one part in ~ 1080...the number of particles in the observable universe.
Pete. 
|
This was posted on the energy into mass in questions and answers and really goes to the heart of a twister theory universe.
This is taking an excellent post on the properties of energy and applying an extrapolation that in no way is meant to drag any one into my ideas but reflect the excellence of the highly informed nature of the members on this forum.
If the universe is captured in filaments of density then both positive and negative states of matter exist simultaneously in the same universe in equal measure although not in the same location but certainly capable of transition from one state to the other given the right conditions.
In a filament of density to have the transit of stars from one part of the filament to another would need to include a transition through time and by reversing the progression of time and still including forward progression the nature of charge must also be reversed as a time related process and certainly not as an instantaneous explosion or discharge.
I would note the ancient texts would not have the understanding of why this was occuring or the implications and so give their own best interpretations based on their observations and faith. So by only looking at their observations, electrical discharge and the observance of energy such as St Elmo's fire and the intensity or the auroas in the north and south hemispheres what can modern science add to this knowledge with our current measures and forcasts.
Would it explain why our own super massive galactic worm hole seems to be so much more active and yet taking in a decreasing volume of matter. Also the nature of gravity in a bar spiral system if only perceived as a bar sprial because we are in the filament would show an attraction only to one arm of the spiral and due to the different position of the other arm on our off side explain it absence of influence on gravity to this arm of the spiral.
There are profound implications to twister theory at best like Einstein's revision of gravity a one in a million difference this need to use a gravity density model to power twister give two classes of black hole, one where the gravity draws matter into the centre and theoretical infinite compression. The other a super massive worm hole where the force of gravity flows through to "the other side" through the worm hole but along the side of the worm hole where the gravity of the rest of the captured universe holds the ends of the wormhole open.
It fundamentally comes back to this simple premise 'is it possible that the initial micro black holes grew to become the filaments of density that are observed in the dark matter maps of the universe'.
If this universe is in any way symptomatic of this then urgent action to understand and prepare for transition which would be noted in the dimminished intensity of the magnetic poles may be a reasonable precaution rather than just have it unexpectedly dumped on us.
Cheers Mike