Well I do not need to learn about eeisemceesquared, I learned all that when I was a student, so that is no answer to the question. I have the idea that you do not understand the imporatance of this equation, nor how it is derived, nor that his has nothing to do with motion of the particle, (it describes the particle's rest mass, with rest as in not moving, so no direction etc.).

Well, that discussion is just nothing. And I never asked about the relationship between mass and force, that is easily described by Newton's equations. I asked about what you meant by drawing a force field. What you meant by adding the forces. Why you state that Fl is a force whereas dimensional analysis shows that it is not a force.

Well, try to find your book. I know Einstein felt bad about the cosmological constant, but I never heard about the ceesquared thingy. Anybody else that can enlighten me?

The extra page that you made, wow, it explains like NOTHING. First of all you will have to come up with a reason why your Fl exists, and why you call it a force when it is not a force from dimensional arguments.
And then you change 2r into the DeBrogli wavelength, wow! but what does it show. Explain it to us here in understandable terms not like in post #8 which was just wordsalat.

For now the CLF is not.

__________________
************************************************** *************************
Optimism does not change the laws of physics. (T'Pol)
A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is. (Dao De Jing 27)
************************************************** *************************
Martin ( http://www.geocities.com/DrMartinV )