“5.71 x 10^-27 joules”

The “EEP theory” predicts that the energy of the EEP at rest is 5.71 x 10^-27 joules.

The reason that I put “” around the phrase “EEP theory” is because this is the first quantitative prediction that I have made about the EEP, and I am wondering if we can call it a theory simply on that basis?

It is still ATM, but is it still an ATM idea or is it an ATM theory?

Note that the EEP always has positive energy. The electric charge is the energy density differential between two energy environments. The negative charge assigned to an electron is an energy differential between the EEPs that make up the electron and the low energy density surrounding the proton.