Quote:
Originally Posted by aguest
In the following online article, I make a public allegation of science fraud at NASA with regard to the discovery of the Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum. I call it the first "space fraud" in history.
That discoverer has just been named as one of the 100 most important people of the world by TIME Magazine. Obviously, I would not put out this article if I were not on very solid grounds. I am. The response from NASA (which agency is informed on this site) so far has been one of silence. This can be interpreted in two ways: (1) This matter is not worthy of their attention, (2) They will not acknowledge there is any issue.
If you look throught the article, you will find that it is a pretty serious matter.
AN INVESTIGATIVE REPORT OF SCIENCE FRAUD AT NASA
THE GENESIS COVENANT
Is the Big Bang Blackbody Bogus?
<removed link - Serenitude>
|
You definitely need to rewrite this. First in a proper writing form that gives a summary of all the major points, then expands on them later.
You jumped around in your presentation, and found not one summary of all the various points you were making, that it was akin to assembling a 1000 piece puzzle in the dark while wearing ray-bans.
Additionally you presented no evidence of an actual cover up of any kind. Presenting some hand written drawing of a nefarious device called a sky horn is definitely not evidence of a cover up. Evidence of a cover up would include NASA letters, emails, and documents and specifications of equipment used in the detection of the back-body. Also statements from people that were on those teams at NASA would be good.
And tying all your badly presented hypotheses is with all those relics, which are totally unrelated to anything involved with your back-body idea's makes an already difficult read, near impossible.
Your idea was presented in a typical Woo Woo look at this I can do Bold and colorful fonts on web pages fashion so I invent a conspiracy for a web page.
With no real evidence, no schematics of equipment, no supporting facts from NASA historical information, you have made no killing points at all.
Unless you call ruining peoples eyesight with that web-page design a killing point. . .