Quote:
Originally Posted by Serenitude
Removed links to the author's webpage.
|
Bummer. I wanted to run it through the w3c validator to see how many errors it has.
edit to add: Nemmine, I found it in my history (oh, my eyes!). The validator won't touch it unless I tell it to use the character encoding iso-8859-1 (Western Europe) because he uses a literal M-dash, and that's not in utf-8. Being generous, HTML 4.01 transitional produces 90 errors. I doubt that fixing these would make it any more readable.
Fred