tusenfem

In reply to your questions:

What do you mean by drawing the force field?

Newton showed that a gravity force field without a central mass consisted of two lines; to the left of the maximum force the line increases from zero to maximum force at a ratio of 1:1 and to the right the force decreased according to the inverse square law

Why do you think that eeisemceesquared has something to do with directional motion?

Because all the books I have define it as a constant of speed.

So now you are summing the forces at different radii, so you get sumr(F(r)). That's cool, but it still leads to a sum of quatities with unit Newton (kg m / s2) whereas your Fl still has units kg m (Fl = r m) so, you talk about force but you ain't working with force.

Physicist measure mass in units of eV the V stands for volts a measure of electromotive force.

Using the radii found with the CLF equation plot a field with no central mass so that the force (mass in eV) is divided equally either side of the maximum force. Measure the force at regular intervals and add them together; it will be found that all particles have the same total force; this is the Linear Force Constant. Because the vacuum wave rotates around the central Vacuum Zero Point, the wavelength is equal to the diameter therefore it is convenient to change the constant so that 2r equals the wavelength.

I have shown that this produces an equation which, as you pointed out; applies to a single momentum. I then re-worked the equations to produce an equation that holds true for any rate of momentum.

Finally I have shown, in a rough draft; that the Fine Structure Constant (Coupling Constant) can be derived from the proposed particles structure.

I have not been able to track down any reference to Einstein’s dissatisfaction with ‘c’ squared so I will concede that point rather than debate what is only a side issue to my proposal.