Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortis
Actually we have a pretty good grasp of what gravity is in terms of the geometry of spacetime. There are acknowledged issues regarding how it all fits into a quantum mechanical framework, but you model provides no insight there either.
Anyway, you attempt to explain gravity in terms of magnetism. As you do not seem able to explain what magnetism is, then you have achieved nothing. This is particularly true as you do not appear to understand magnetism beyond the gross level of general attractions and repulsions, i.e. you do not seem to be aware of the quantitative behaviour of magnetic systems.
By the way, we are still awaiting your answers to why "mercury has 55% character of A and 45% character of B atom". (As well as the rest of the unanswered questions.)
|
True science view about
: present magnet
Paramagnetism:
The tendency for most of the transition metals and their compounds in oxidation states involving
incomplete inner electron sub shells to move into a magnetic field.
Ferromagnetism: An extreme form of paramagnetism - a property exhibited only by iron, cobalt, nickel, and gadolinium. They have
incompletely filled d or f subshells
So
incomplete inner electron sub shell is source or result for magnetisms.
Can you tell me what is the true reason for this incomplete inner electron sub shells??????
Same way can you explain me what is orbital axis?
this is one of comments about my theory
magnetfreek Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Posts: 1
Post subject: I think that this be the true meaning of all true science and observable fact. It is clear that the last century was extremely misguided and ignored the crystal clear unsolved magnetic issues. the "standard model" does not even attempt to clearly explain all observable phenomena. the construction of the large hadron collider and experimental fusion reactor are entirely baseless. I highly respect your work and expertise.
.