Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
It seems you've sorta covered gravity, in this thread, and along the way electromagnetism crept in, via your speculations on the charge of an EEP.
Let's see if you've actually covered electromagnetism, in a semi-classical way ...
|
Let me say this here, I have not covered electromagnetism.
Quote:
What, in the ISU/EEP idea, is a photon?
|
A photon is a packet of EEPs emitted by an electron.
Quote:
|
How, in the ISU/EEP idea, does electromagnetism 'work'? As in, is it a force? (if so, how does it arise, what are its fundamental characteristics?) If not, what is it?
|
I have only just figured out a rudimentary way of quantifing the energy of an EEP. That calculation was the result of a bottom up approach to describing how matter would form from the energy density of space when that density reached the ideal density for matter formation. I am at the point in the specifics of matter formation where a photon is being emitted from an electron for the first time after the hydrogen atom has formed from the energy density of space. I have not even thought through what the emission of the photon does to the atom the emits it. I guess it imparts rotation in space but I'm not there yet.
Quote:
|
For gravity, what is its speed of propagation, in the ISU/EEP idea?
|
I have given that some thought. I can't tell you in meters per second but I am thinking that the shift in EEPs due to gravity fast. I don't see that it is related to the speed of light though. I just don't know.
Quote:
|
Which of the relevant equivalence principles, at the heart of GR, does the ISU/EEP idea say are wrong (or need re-stating)?
|
I don't know.
Quote:
|
Going a bit further, perhaps beyond the scope of this thread, what are the weak and strong (nuclear) forces, in the ISU/EEP idea?
|
I don't know.
There is an energy density differential caused by the formation of the proton. The formation of the proton occurs as EEPs become synchronized and join together to pulse alternatively. When they become synchronized there is space vacated that causes an energy density differential between the vacated space and the energy density of the surrounding background. That differential still exists when the proton has completed forming and is the reason why EEPs swarm the proton. The swarming results in the formation of an electron which I predict has a one for one relationship between the number of EEPs in the electron and the number of EEPs on the surface of the proton.
That energy differential is what holds the electron to the proton. I haven't tried to analyze that in regard to weak and strong (nuclear) forces. I also have not built atoms bigger that hydrogen using the bottom up approach.
Quote:
|
In particular, how many EEPs to a neutrino?
|
The number of EEPs in the electron and proton that I predicted are determined by this so called bottom up process. This is the lowest of energy environments, long before stars form, and early in the process of photon generation that extracts energy from the background and adds it to matter. Neutrons don't even exist yet though I predict that they form in the first round of hydrogen stars.
Neutrinos probably form from the collapse of the first hydrogen stars but I have not gotten that far in my bottom up approach.
Right now, where I stand in the bottom up approach is at the point that the young new matter is heating up from the proton emissions due to gravity, i.e. the photons that are emitted by atoms perpetuate the low energy density surrounding mass. Gravity is the response of mass to the low energy density surrounding mass. Mass tends to move toward the low energy density path through space. The lowest energy density path is a straigh line between masses. This tends to cause mass to move into the gravitational wells of other mass.