Originally Posted by Nereid It seems you've sorta covered gravity, in this thread, and along the way electromagnetism crept in, via your speculations on the charge of an EEP. Let's see if you've actually covered electromagnetism, in a semi-classical way ...

Originally Posted by Bogie

Understanding the infinite reach of gravity as a flow of electrical current:
We are looking at an arena, our expanding universe at the point in time that matter has just formed. Matter at this early stage in the bottom up analysis of nucleosynthesis consists of hydrogen atoms. Gravity has begun in the arena for the first time since the ball of extremely high energy density EEPs emerged from the negated crunch.

Gravity is the flow of EEPs from the energy density of space, through the atom and out as photons.

This is like an electrical current flowing from the energy density of space, through the atom and out of the atom in the form of photons. The atom generates this current.

This is not to say that the photons don’t then have their roll in the energy transfer process, but the flow from the energy density of space into the formation of photons is a perpetual current through the atom. Photons act like little storage batteries that contain energy that can then be transferred to matter.

The electrical charge of the EEP = -4.20260913 × 10-28 coulombs per unifying particle if my assumptions and calculations are correct.

This makes gravity an electrical current that has an infinite reach across space that contains energy density in the form of EEPs, i.e. all space. The force of gravity can be measured at the source if the photons that are emitted from this flow can be measured and if the energy of the photon can be converted to EEPs.

The force of the gravitational field in any patch of space can be measured by the movement of EEPs in the patch of space. Movement of those EEP is in response to the low energy density generated around mass by the initial formation of protons. The low energy density surrounding mass is perpetuated continuously by the flow of gravity.

Can anyone object and show some reason for the objection? I would like to be able to put all of this ISU and EEP stuff behind me. My only way out is for you to embarrass me with the obvious that I have missed in this bottom up process of trying to understand the universe.