Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogie
Is this where you are referring to where you learned I was joking?
The infinite reach of gravity in the ISU
You can see I was kidding about declaring it mainstream; the joke being as if just by saying it, that made it so. That is what I was kidding about.
I wouldn’t say that I covered electromagnetism by saying the flow of EEPs that I refer to is like an electrical current. The suggestion is that because the flow of EEPs is initiated by the energy density differential surrounding the proton that it is like the flow of electrical current.
Am I wrong to make a comparison between an electrical current and the flow of EEPs that is due to an energy density differential?
That is the electrical charge of an electron divided by the number of EEPs in the electron at rest from my earlier calculations.
It is an effort to compare gravity as I describe it to an electrical current, i.e. to make a comparison of the electrical charge of the electron to that of the EEP in that comparison. It compares the flow of EEPs that cause gravity to the flow of electrons that cause electricity.
|
Some clarifications then please:
1) your post, which I quoted,
intended to make 'gravity as (electrical) current' an
analogy (despite what you actually wrote in it)?
2) In the ISU/EEP idea, there is no relationship between photons and electrical charge?
3) introducing calculations of the charge on an EEP, in that post, was not
intended to have any relevance to 'gravity as a current' (other than that both involve some kind of 'flow')?
4) Other than 'flow', from some kind of higher (density) region (or state?) to a lower one, in what respect(s) is it legitimate to use the 'gravity as current' analogy?
For example, charge carriers (both positive and negative)? generation of gravitational radiation (due to accelerating charges)? existence of a 'gravitomagnetic' force (due to special relativistic 'frames of reference')?