What I am getting at is simply this. What is true and what is not can be revealed by taking a bird's eye view of the two camps.

One camp (group of individuals or thoughts supporting one side of a two-sided issue) is in harmony and in fundamental agreement within itself.

The other camp is in turmoil within its own boarders.

Clearly the group of individuals who think we did NOT go to the moon is in fundamental disagreement within itself.

Clearly, the other camp is not. I see no arguing amongst individuals that think we went to the moon.

-----------

If -- in some alternate universe -- "we" did not go to the moon, then I imagine there would be some unified theory or opinion of how it was faked and a compelling scenario of how it was faked. And the people who wanted to believe that the lunar landings did happen would be falling over each other stumbling and stammering to refute the evidence the other side brought up.