Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > About BAUT
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2006, 06:28 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
Perhaps, but you seem to be in the minority. I don't like having more than two nested quotes, but I have been in conversations in which having two would be very helpful. And it is a pain. I just figured out how to nest quotes yesterday. What's more, I find it rude to tell other people to change their writing style--unless, of course, it consists of intentionally incorrect spelling and grammar. I may criticize small points now and again, but frankly, I'm not sure how one would go about changing one's writing style to make up for the lack of nesting quotes.


True, certainly, but again, the majority seems to disagree with you. Granted, we're not in a democracy, here--more a sort of benevolent dictatorship with two benevolent dictators--so it doesn't matter what either you or I think; it matters what Phil and Fraser think.
It also matters what the software will allow, but I agree - I would be very much in favor of a second level of quoting. Writing style aside, it also depends on the nature of the discussion. Often I'll be in a back and forth discussion with questions and quick comments. For instance, I might ask:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
What is the expected mass of a gallup-maker?
and the answering post might look like:

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
What is the expected mass of a gallup-maker?
25-50 pounds.
And given that there could easily be a list of responses in one post, when I quote a post for further comment this is how it might look in the editor:

Quote:
25-50 pounds.

You should read Oolong's guide to zorboloxy.

What are you talking about?

The angle needs to be 90 degrees.

Mars.
Without context, nobody is going to understand this. I know that because I often need to refer to the post in another window so that I can understand what I'm responding to. Simply saying it is a matter of writing style doesn't cut it. One way or another, the context must be included, and if another level of quoting was allowed, in many cases that wouldn't be an issue.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today