Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 04:03 PM
Drakheim Drakheim is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 389
Send a message via AIM to Drakheim Send a message via Yahoo to Drakheim
Default My masterpiece on GLP

Dont want to torture you guys with having to go there so here ya go.

** snip from GLP **

Quote:
After attempting to keep up with the 6 or 7 threads she has going at a time a few friends and I have come to the following conclusions:

MULTIPLE THREADS GIVE HER AN UPPER HAND.

We would all like to believe that Nancy is off her rocker and that no sane person would actually believe most of that she was writing. She, however, dose seem to have some knowledge on psychology. By keeping multiple threads going at the same time and posting similar or exact statements in each one, she divides her opposition’s attention. All of us being human make mistakes, and since the opposition to her is scattered trying to keep up with multiple threads, we ultimately make a slip up here and there in the wording of science or over an opinion, which she uses against us to further her case.

“CHERRY PICKING REPLYS”

Nancy IS human, and no human can be expected to keep up with the amount of counter posts that her multiple threads generate. Nancy, however, dose pick one post at times to answer. Mainly Jonathan’s in recent days. While doing this though, she will go through and only answer the sections of her choosing that she can either evade or twist the question so that it remains unanswered. When she dose answer multiple posts, she dose the same thing. Many times in-between her postings, the “debunkers” have painted her in a corner so to speak. They posed specific questions that if answered, would damn her case and have her admitting she was incorrect.

PSUDO SCIENCE

Time and time again Nancy has given “proof” of her claims that are derived from the “Zetas”. She has made countless claims of how human science and intelligence cannot comprehend the math or understanding of how things work in our own solar system. Despite the rebuttals of how man has achieved countless successful space launches of probes and such, or how we have our solar system’s major bodies (Planets, Moons, known smaller objects ecct.) orbits accounted and calculated, she continues this claim. She has also failed, time and time again, to provide any math or explanations on what PX really is or how it can be on such an erratic orbit for so long and not 1) crash into another planet, 2) stop so close to the sun for MUCH LONGER than it should be or 3) why the effects of gravity from such an object has had no measurable effect on any planet we observe.

PSYCOLOGICAL MAKE-UP OF THE HUMAN BRAIN

I do not need to tell you about how odd human behavior is. Reading anything on GLP will show you the vast extremes of the mentality we posses. One common bond we all share is the need for proof. For better or worse that is how we function and operate.
Lets assume for a moment that the Zetas are real. (You have no idea how hard that was to type =P) They would first have to find a way to travel the vast nothingness of space. There are theories of using wormholes to do such a thing and I will admit to the possibility of that as a travel means. Then they would have to have entered our atmosphere without detection, not too much of a challenge if they can do the trans-space flight. Then the “implant” into Nancy’s brain.

Assuming an alien culture could do ALL of that, then they would obviously have to have some knowledge of the human mental make-up. They would understand our need for proof before we accept anything as fact. Yet Nancy has claimed over and over again that they will not provide us with any proof or math to substantiate these claims. She claims they want us to figure it out for ourselves. The problem with her claim here-to-in is that we DO know how things that we can see and track will act in our solar system. Everything that we know says that such an object, as PX is NOT there. And if we were completely inept in this matter, then one would think (and hope) that an advance alien race would take pity on our ignorance and help us more in the face of the mythical “disaster” that the so-called PX would cause.

OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS

Nancy’s admitted “white lie” of May 2003 was supposed to force the evil government’s hand according to her. She claims that on the date she stated, the US launched “Operation Planet X” in Iraq. No proof or unusual troop movements were seen or reported.

She claims that the media is being controlled by a conspiracy of the NSA / CIA / Illuminati and so on and so forth. She has failed to account for foreign media outlets that are not on friendly terms with the USA. American’s have access to view the medias of the world at will. During the Iraq war for example, Al-Jazerra’s website received a record number of hits from within the US because people wanted to see “the other side” of the story. Al-Jazerra is a free media outlet such as the ones in the US and they are not on good terms with the US government. There are also other outlets that we can view such as the state run media of China, various medias throughout Europe and Asia and the Australian medias for example. The US government, its agencies OR the fabled Illuminati do not have the manpower or the money to suppress that many medias or reporters. We all know from the past, that ALL stories and scandals leak to the media somehow. It happened when president Bill Clinton was in office over the Monica case. If the evil government was so powerful at controlling the media, how did any of that get out? Also if the evil government wanted to keep anything like this silenced, Nancy would be lying in a cold box in the ground somewhere from their assassins. They would not let her go about saying anything.


CONCLUSIONS:

Nancy, though seemingly ignorant, is knowledgeable in the regards necessary to be a doomsayer. She knows how to play off of human flaws to keep her case going despite extreme opposition. From reading her posts over the past few months though, I have also begun to wonder:

Dose she really believe in PX? From the early posts before May of 2003 it would seem that she did. After the admitted “white lie” though, he posts have changed. It seems to me that she found out that she was wrong and had been for a long time. Though human arrogance intervened. After nothing happened in May of 2003 she was repeatedly attacked over and over regarding her “failed prediction”. I personally think she decided at that point to keep the façade up as a snide insult to the debunkers and to rattle the nerves of the people who simply don’t know better. From what I can see it seems that she is going for the effect of saying “HA HA! You actually believed it!” and then vanish in a self-induced blaze of glory.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 04:28 PM
LTC8K6 LTC8K6 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central NC
Posts: 990
Default

The U.S. military did indeed launch Operation Planet X in Iraq on May 15, 2003. It was a raid ~11 miles south of Tikrit in search of Ba'ath party members.

They were most likely poking fun at Nancy, and making reference to it being the end of the world for Iraq's former rulers.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 04:43 PM
NightHawk NightHawk is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 172
Default

I had read her references to operation planet x and decided to research. I had found one reference that tha actual name was "Plan X" and that she had changed it to "Planet X" But after looking on news and military sites i do believe it was actually caled operation planet x. I also agree with you that the name was chosen to poke fun at Nancy.
__________________
What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory (insert least favorite test animal, person), we can assume it will be pretty bad.
{changed as per Frogesque's request :D}
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 05:17 PM
LTC8K6 LTC8K6 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central NC
Posts: 990
Default

People forget that Nancy essentially specifically challenged our troops by saying we would not be allowed to invade successfully and that there would be no regime change in Iraq.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 05:53 PM
Drakheim Drakheim is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 389
Send a message via AIM to Drakheim Send a message via Yahoo to Drakheim
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTC8K6
People forget that Nancy essentially specifically challenged our troops by saying we would not be allowed to invade successfully and that there would be no regime change in Iraq.
She is claiming that there has been no regime change. She says that Saddam had a cousin that was altered to look like him put out to be caught. :roll:
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 07:06 PM
LTC8K6 LTC8K6 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central NC
Posts: 990
Default

Well, she also said that Saddam would lash out and attack his neighbors as the world fell apart just prior to PX arrival.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 07:35 PM
latimer latimer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTC8K6
Well, she also said that Saddam would lash out and attack his neighbors as the world fell apart just prior to PX arrival.
Yeah, but she didn't think it meant attacking the individuals in neighboring cells...

:-P

Jonathan
-It doesn't matter yadda yadda-
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 07:42 PM
John Jones's Avatar
John Jones John Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 981
Default

IMO, too much weight is given to Nancy's ability to manipulate people the human psyche.

I think she's mostly an attention wh*re who can't stand not having the following she enjoyed before June, 2003.

Whether she believes this PX stuff any more is debatable, and perhaps moot. She's off her rocker in my book, as well as dishonest and manipulative. I say this after observing her since 1997.
__________________
Quote:
If you admire him so much, then how about you learn to spell his name right?

It's Niels Bohr.
Olsen the moderator.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 07:48 PM
A.DIM's Avatar
A.DIM A.DIM is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 4,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTC8K6
The U.S. military did indeed launch Operation Planet X in Iraq on May 15, 2003. It was a raid ~11 miles south of Tikrit in search of Ba'ath party members.

They were most likely poking fun at Nancy, and making reference to it being the end of the world for Iraq's former rulers.
Coincidentally....
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2004, 07:53 PM
John Jones's Avatar
John Jones John Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A.DIM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTC8K6
The U.S. military did indeed launch Operation Planet X in Iraq on May 15, 2003. It was a raid ~11 miles south of Tikrit in search of Ba'ath party members.

They were most likely poking fun at Nancy, and making reference to it being the end of the world for Iraq's former rulers.
Coincidentally....
So that's where she stole the idea that Iraq wouldn't be invaded.

It's not like her to actually say anything with much originality.

She has always used the cafeteria-style method of creating Cult Orthodoxy. When you think about it, doing so gives her plenty of kook sources to cite.

Too bad for her that she cites herself almost exclusively.
__________________
Quote:
If you admire him so much, then how about you learn to spell his name right?

It's Niels Bohr.
Olsen the moderator.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 18-April-2004, 07:55 AM
crux crux is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 75
Default

please define <<Cult Orthodoxy>>
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 19-April-2004, 03:53 AM
tuffel999 tuffel999 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTC8K6
Well, she also said that Saddam would lash out and attack his neighbors
Which wasn't such a bad bet good thing it didn't happen though.
__________________
Light is faster than sound. "That's why some people appear bright until they speak"

WWGD (What Would GLP Do)

Inspected by #13
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today