expired

I think you may be missing the point of differential geometry here. The expansion of the universe is not like the expansion of a solid object embedded in our universe (like watching a balloon expand as you inflate it), but is actually an expansion of the manifold itself (like being a two-dimensional creature living on the surface of the balloon as it inflates, except in quite a few more dimensions). In other words, there is no "edge" to the universe and no "outside" for the edge you describe to move through.

And I'm not an expert, but I think you may be getting things horribly wrong from the get-go by using anything to do with Euclid (real space-time is non-euclidean), the model of an acoustic medium is not one I'm sure you can justify because of this (as well as many other reasons, including the requirement for an aether), and V=(cT)^3 isn't the volume of an expanding sphere. I'm still not sure what "the inverse square law is intrinsic" has to do with the price of bread here. And I don't see how you explain the non-uniform character of the background radiation either.

It can be commented that the source of the dipole displayed by the cosmic microwave background in this non-compliant model may be considered as due to the displacement of our observation position from the origin. The dim end of the dipole points to the origin and the temperature differential of the dipole relative to the background temperature determines the age of that sphere on which the observer resides relative to the origin. We can compute our position in the universe from current data.

And that makes no sense at all because the background radiation isn't bipolar, it's multipolar if anything. It's "clumpy" to use the technical term. Which totally contradicts what your model would predict, even if it wasn't so... simplistically stated.

I agree that the CMB is not bipolar, no lithium prescription needed here

However the radiation does exhibit a smooth dipole that has a .01% variation on the 2.73K background and this is its most prominent feature. Please check your facts. To my way of thinking, the clumpiness refers to the distribution of matter in the volume of space and the effect of gravity on light imparts further red shift to the CMB as it travels to the observer.

This maximum growth rate model defies Einstein's cosmological principle (as does the variance in the CMB for all clumps and the dipole). The model can account for Hubble expansion as a repulsive gravitational effect due to a radial aether density gradient. Here we need to consider the density of a volume: this is a dimensionless descriptor equivalent to alpha, the fine structure constant.