I actually managed to persuade Nancy she was wrong about Mars being in the wrong place.

See page six on this
WARNING: GLP THREAD!!!.

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

=D>

Heh. Well, you SHOULD give a nod to reality, which helped some.

Jonathan
-Didn't matter what you believed. What mattered was what you could prove.-

If reality were a factor, Nancy would have given up long ago. I am actually stunned that she admitted she was wrong - and did so several places on GLP. I wonder if she will maintain her usual practice and keep the page with the incorrect claims up, even so.

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

If she admits she was wrong about this one thing, What about everything else she's said??? :-s

__________________
Isn't the fact that they don't visit us proof that intelligent life is out there?

The Confused Philosopher - RCAF

Jonathan and I (and others) are working on that. But don't hold your breath.

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

She didn't really admit that she was wrong about Mars being out of place. According to her the issue was that NASA had doctored the pics, not that Mars was out of place. Her normal dackpeddeling and trying to cover her butt. I would bet that anything on her site that says that Mars is out of whack will disappear in the next couple days.

A while back I called her on her claims about Sedna and NASA depicting it as a large object in the sky.

http://www.zetatalk.com/index/signma13.htm

http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta81.htm

I pointed out to her what the caption of the image really was. It took her about 2 weeks but she finally did give proper credit for the image sources and the actual caption of the original image.

Of course, by the time she corrected the pages they had already been seen by anyone who cared and had the desired effect. :^o

__________________
What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory (insert least favorite test animal, person), we can assume it will be pretty bad.
{changed as per Frogesque's request :D}

Now she is on some wierd refraction of light kick. She goes through all realms of science completely destroying credibility at every level. :roll:

__________________
We've got a five dollar fine, for whining: Chris Ledoux

Yeah, I noticed that. Good on ya, and congrats. It takes a sledge-hammer to knock on her door of denial.

The thing is... well, you know what the thing is.

She'll still claim the zetas are almost always right, and anyone who sez otherwise is paid by NASA to misinform the 'common man'. She'll misquote you if necessary.

I sure wish NASA would send me my debunker check soon!

__________________
Olsen the moderator.

Nancy has never understood the diff between refraction of light and gravitational lensing, or the Doppler effect for that matter.

Since Nancy never heard of anything but a 'red shift' she thinks that proves that red wavelengths obey different laws of physics. It was pointed-out that the Andromeda galaxy is blue shifted, but she ignores this sort of contradictory evidence. I suppose it's another NASA conspiracy.


Nancy thinks that refractive index is some 'pitiful human science', but that her white and red personas (q.v.) offer a better explanation of observed phenomenae.

People have been trying to explain it to her for 9 years, but she remains willfully ignorant.

__________________
Olsen the moderator.

I tried to point out her errors concerning the "red shift" to her once. She was claiming some such nonsense about how red light from px is bent by earths gravity due to the "red shift". :roll:

__________________
We've got a five dollar fine, for whining: Chris Ledoux

It's getting worse - over on tt-watch she's claiming that the earth's "dark twin" is now visible.

Funny, but right now both Venus, Saturn, and Mars are now plainly visible in the night sky where I am (Dallas, TX).

Venus is now at mag -2.9 (pretty damn bright).

Tom Mosher

__________________
I feel a hot wind on my shoulder
And the touch of a world that is older

If Nancy or her sources think that they are reading the star charts correctly, then why don't they give the names of stars or constellations that the "object" appears in or near? That would make it a bit easier to clear up.

I was just outside and saw the barest sliver of a crescent Moon showing, too. You never know, with some of these people. #-o

__________________
GhiaPet Home Page

Seems like goldikeproductions is offline... darn I can't go read the hoopla.
Maybe the server imploded under the strain of trying to digitaly accept the crazy talk of Nancy.

__________________
-- the only conspiracy I believe in is this damn monopoly on breathing air.

No, it's either interferance from PX or the disinfo agents shut um down.

__________________
I must not PX. PX is the mind-killer. I will face my PX. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the PX has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

Many of the regulars there are sure that the gubmint monitors the site and that disinfo agents and shills immediately respond to threads to help supress the "truth." In March and April there was a rash of threads "explaining" how income tax was illegal, that the IRS was a foreign corporation, and other weird reasons why you didn't have to pay income taxes! My posts of the relevant facts, sections of law, Court decisions, etc. were met with cries of "IRS shill!!"

__________________
Standing on the shoulders of giants...