Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:16 PM
iantresman's Avatar
iantresman iantresman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,376
Default Milky Way X-ray Mystery... not for the Electric Universe!

June 28, 2004
Milky Way X-ray Mystery Deepens

I think 'Fair Use' allows me to extract some quotes from this article (in full at the link above):

Quote:
Originally Posted by The article above,
"Astronomers have long puzzled over the origin of the x-ray glow in the middle of our Milky Way galaxy [..] researchers determined that these unresolved sources could not account for all of the remaining x-rays. In fact, they estimated that the galactic center would have to contain 200,000 of the known X-ray objects--10 times more than are predicted to exist--in order to generate the leftover light in the image.

".. the origin of the hotter gas remains an enigma [..] The heating problem may call into question some of the basic understanding
of the composition of the interstellar medium."
Thanks to Amy Acheson who mentions that this is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amy
No mystery at all. Alfvén explains it in the first paragraph of chapter 1 of Cosmic Plasma. He pointed out that the lab plasma was "complicated and awkward. The plasma exhibited striations, double layers, and an assortment of oscillations and instabilities. The electron temperature was often found to be one or two orders of magnitude larger than the gas temperature, with the ion temperature intermediate."

In other words, Chandra has just discovered that plasma at the galactic core behaves exactly the way it does in laboratories on Earth!
Regards,
Ian Tresman
Proponent, The Electric Universe
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:30 PM
soupdragon2 soupdragon2 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,078
Send a message via MSN to soupdragon2
Default

Another interesting development!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lm Wong
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
This laughable parody of a theory has been beaten to death...
Contrary to your assumptions - The Plasma Universe Cosmology proposed by Hannes Alfven and Anthony Peratt is alive and kicking...
It seems Mr Wong was right, despite some claiming that the EU is a laughable parody of a theory! Unfortunately this was Mr Wong's last post before he was banned.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:34 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

a) According to you, this is evidence for the EU.
b) I can think of at least one possible source - a very large one with the mass of over a hundred million suns
c) Judging from that quote, the plasma at the galactic core doesn't behave much like the stuff in the lab.
d) Just because it's at the galactic core doesn't mean it's everywhere. The core is a pretty strange place, you know...
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:35 PM
Musashi's Avatar
Musashi Musashi is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brea, CA USA
Posts: 4,316
Send a message via AIM to Musashi
Default

I know you are not implying that LM was banned because he was a EU proponent, but I just want to make it clear in case someone else tries to read that into your post: Lm Wong was banned for violating the rules regarding sockpuppets. He was not banned because his views differ from the administrator's.
__________________
Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:45 PM
soupdragon2 soupdragon2 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,078
Send a message via MSN to soupdragon2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musashi
I know you are not implying that LM was banned because he was a EU proponent, but I just want to make it clear in case someone else tries to read that into your post: Lm Wong was banned for violating the rules regarding sockpuppets. He was not banned because his views differ from the administrator's.
Well, I think he was smart enough, even if he was a bit naughty.

Any guesses as to his next puppet? How about P. Lasma?
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:52 PM
Musashi's Avatar
Musashi Musashi is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brea, CA USA
Posts: 4,316
Send a message via AIM to Musashi
Default



or Am Salp... Ma Plas...
__________________
Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2004, 11:58 PM
wedgebert wedgebert is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,214
Default

Well, I guess I'm going to bow out of this discussion early. It doesn't show anything related to EU, and it's just a minor question for the mainstream. Before Chandra, we only knew about 20 or so X-Ray sources from the galactic core, now we've discovered over 2,000. Plenty more can be lurking about waiting to be found.

As to the two plasma cloud sources. Some sort of energy source is required to keep the plasma "hot" and some thing is required to keep the plasma from blowing itself away as well.

Electromagnetic fields will not satisfy the latter, and you would need external EM fields to satisfy the former. This implies a massive object like a black hole or neutron star. Both of these objects would pull in the plasma, accelerating it. This would increase the energy, and begin to give off radiation. Most of this radiation would then push the plasma back out, heating it up in the process. X-rays, and possibly radio waves would pass though the cloud and be detectable by us. But thats just one theory I came up with real quickly off the top of my head.

Hopefully, when the Astro-E2 is launched (scheduled for Feb, 05), it will help solve questions like this.
__________________
People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 12:06 AM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Soup, you don't seem to get the idea that the EU massively violates the known laws of physics. If something is completely impossible, it's completely impossible. The EU, unfortunately, is completely impossible. Arguing with you is like arguing with a religious fanatic - no matter what facts are thrust before you, you still expound the phony virtues of your pet "theory".

By the way, notice that someone who called themselves "Soupdragon" (as opposed to "Soupdragon2") posted here a while ago, saying things rather similar to what you say? Did you know that their username is still active? Do you happen to be that person? If so, why don't you drop the unnecessary sock puppet?

I daresay this is the last time I will post anything in response to you. Now I think I'll go and argue with Jerry Jenson, who, despite being a static universe proponent, actually seems to be reasonably sane.

BTW, Musashi, who was Lm Wong's previous sock puppet?
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 12:11 AM
Musashi's Avatar
Musashi Musashi is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brea, CA USA
Posts: 4,316
Send a message via AIM to Musashi
Default

Aldrin
Lm Wong
d 2022
mk ultra
orion 38
mr arriba
arriba superstar

All the same. Also, Soup has said a few times that he is the same person but forgot his password. There is nothing wrong with that as long as he doesn't go back to posting from his other account, and even then, it would be, I hope, obvious that he is the same person, which defeats the purpose of puppets.
__________________
Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 12:15 AM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Oww. I thought that that irritating bloke got IP banned. Apparently not.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 12:32 AM
iantresman's Avatar
iantresman iantresman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedgebert
As to the two plasma cloud sources. Some sort of energy source is required to keep the plasma "hot" and some thing is required to keep the plasma from blowing itself away as well.
The energy source is simply that stars and galaxies behave as a "homopolar motor" (or Faraday Disk). You can find out more about them on them Electric Cosmos Web site.

If you'd like a "proper" citation from the ADS database, try:

"The Hubble expansion as ascribed to mutual magnetic induction between neighboring galaxies" by Bostick, W. H. in Laser and Particle Beams (ISSN 0263-0346), vol. 6, Aug. 1988, p. 405-408. Abstract here.

Regards,
Ian Tresman
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 12:39 AM
iantresman's Avatar
iantresman iantresman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
b) I can think of at least one possible source - a very large one with the mass of over a hundred million suns
Indeed, the evidence is consistent with more than one theory, neither of which are mutally exclusive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
b) Just because it's at the galactic core doesn't mean it's everywhere. The core is a pretty strange place, you know...
Absolutely right, and no inference is inferred.

Regards,
Ian Tresman
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 01:11 AM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iantresman
"The Hubble expansion as ascribed to mutual magnetic induction between neighboring galaxies" by Bostick, W. H. in Laser and Particle Beams (ISSN 0263-0346), vol. 6, Aug. 1988, p. 405-408. Abstract here.
Ian, this is even less possible than electricaly-shaped galaxies. Do you have any idea at all of the distances involved? Magnetic effects at such distances would require easily detectable magnetic fields, far, far greater than what we observe. Just because something works on a computer doesn't mean it's true.

And by the way, double-posting is really not necessary...
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 10:01 AM
mid's Avatar
mid mid is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
By the way, notice that someone who called themselves "Soupdragon" (as opposed to "Soupdragon2") posted here a while ago, saying things rather similar to what you say? Did you know that their username is still active? Do you happen to be that person? If so, why don't you drop the unnecessary sock puppet?
'soupdragon' isn't really a sockpuppet for soupdragon2. Like myself and my old username 'Iain Lambert', soupdragon has changed email address and lost access to the old account. The user 'soupdragon' had their last post before 'soupdragon2' made their first, so no harm, no foul.

edit - oops. Didn't notice that Musashi just covered this. Sorry.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 11:37 AM
soupdragon2 soupdragon2 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,078
Send a message via MSN to soupdragon2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
Soup, you don't seem to get the idea that the EU massively violates the known laws of physics. If something is completely impossible, it's completely impossible. The EU, unfortunately, is completely impossible. Arguing with you is like arguing with a religious fanatic - no matter what facts are thrust before you, you still expound the phony virtues of your pet "theory".

By the way, notice that someone who called themselves "Soupdragon" (as opposed to "Soupdragon2") posted here a while ago, saying things rather similar to what you say? Did you know that their username is still active? Do you happen to be that person? If so, why don't you drop the unnecessary sock puppet?
I daresay this is the last time I will post anything in response to you. Now I think I'll go and argue with Jerry Jenson, who, despite being a static universe proponent, actually seems to be reasonably sane.
Oh, dear. And you question my sanity! (Last red highlight.) BTW, I didn't start this thread.

And here, you said this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
This is my last post on this thread. I am tired of dealing with such high levels of intentional ignorance and illogic

Do not think that I am admitting defeat; I am admitting victory.
At any rate, I don't think Jerry Jensen has ruled out the Plasma model, although you would need to check this with him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Jensen
...It is also possible that ambiguous results of these tests could lead to further modifications, perhaps reintroducing some aspects of the Big Bang or conversely, slanting the universe towards the plasma models that is already on the table...
Last paragraph of this post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 05:05 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Maybe he needs to know a bit more about the plasma model. Maybe you could tell him, Soup.

But I'll have nothing to do with the EU.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 06:36 PM
soupdragon2 soupdragon2 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,078
Send a message via MSN to soupdragon2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
Maybe he needs to know a bit more about the plasma model. Maybe you could tell him, Soup.

But I'll have nothing to do with the EU.
Well, at least you seem to have calmed down a little.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 07:07 PM
dgruss23's Avatar
dgruss23 dgruss23 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 4,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
By the way, notice that someone who called themselves "Soupdragon" (as opposed to "Soupdragon2") posted here a while ago, saying things rather similar to what you say? Did you know that their username is still active? Do you happen to be that person? If so, why don't you drop the unnecessary sock puppet?
First, Soupdragon explained when he came back that he forgot his old password and had to register with a new username. Conveniently he chose his old username with a "2" added on so it was pretty clear who he was.

Second, a sock puppet is used by the guilty poster as a supposedly different individual who's purpose is to make it seem there is more support for an idea than there actually is. Have you seen Soupdragon2 using his alter ego this way?

Third, I'm quite sure that if soupdragon felt the need for a sockpuppet, he is intelligent enough to know that Soupdragon2 is a rather transparent choice. One would think he'd at least try for something less obvious - such as "Stewlizard 1/2"!

Quote:
I daresay this is the last time I will post anything in response to you. Now I think I'll go and argue with Jerry Jenson, who, despite being a static universe proponent, actually seems to be reasonably sane.
While you're at it, I've answered your questions about Arp.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 07:54 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

a) 2 other people already mentioned the "sock puppet" thing. Apologies for jumping to conclusions.

b) Thanks for answering my questions. :wink:
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2004, 11:26 PM
wildcat wildcat is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
a) According to you, this is evidence for the EU.
b) I can think of at least one possible source - a very large one with the mass of over a hundred million suns
Hi!
What is the mechanism explaining the formation of a Super - Massive Black Hole with the mass of over a hundred million suns from the protogalactic gas cloud?
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 03:40 AM
Lunatik Lunatik is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California, USA
Posts: 555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
a) According to you, this is evidence for the EU.
b) I can think of at least one possible source - a very large one with the mass of over a hundred million suns
Hi!
What is the mechanism explaining the formation of a Super - Massive Black Hole with the mass of over a hundred million suns from the protogalactic gas cloud?
A supermassibe Black Hole can form in any hot plasma where the ambient light converges on a particular center such to cancel all lambda. This cancellation released ZPF energy, which is a very powerful gravitic force, and thus sets in motion the beginnings of a galaxy formation. As stars ignite from this very high energy center and spin off, their ambient light continues to converge on the black hole center, from the spinning perimeters, so that it grows in size and intensity. X-ray is the byproduct of this powerful interaction. Eventually, the whole galaxy with its new stars, and remaining proto-matter, assembles into what is commonly seen as a spiral galaxy, like our Milky Way. This theory, speculative to be sure, is what is forecast by how electromagnetic energy and gravity are inversely proportional, so where the em energy cancels, total gravity takes over again.

I will not belabor this theory here, for brevity's sake, but if anyone is curious how the math works out, SI base units, and how this interaction forms black holes, please see it at: http://www.humancafe.com/cgi-bin/dis...gi?70/108.html
(Copyright "Fair use" allows copying of these linked pages, provided they are for educational purposes, or research only, and not for commercial use.)

Please DO NOT use any of this in your school assignments, or my a** will be grass. But have fun with it.

Ivan
__________________
Caveat Lector. Experimentum summus judex...
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 05:37 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Eh, I'm not sure that's quite right, Lunatik.

Last I heard, a supermassive black hole would form from the merger of smaller black holes generated by supernovae at the core (which contains a lot of old stars), and the sucking in of stars and gas that would follow. A large black hole, over a long period of time, could wolf down a lot of stars...
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 06:32 PM
soupdragon2 soupdragon2 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,078
Send a message via MSN to soupdragon2
Default

Am I missing something? Why don't these super-duper Black Holes gobble-up the whole proto-galactic cloud?

Do they lose their apetite at some point, and why?
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 06:56 PM
wedgebert wedgebert is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,214
Default

Because outside of the event horizion, their gravity is no different than anything else's gravity. If the sun were to suddenly collapse into a black hole, it would have an event horizion of 3 miles (I believe). Earth's orbit would remain unaffected because the total gravity is the same.

So the black hole eats everything nearby and eventually the remaining matter is either oribting fast enough to not fall in, or is too far away to be adversely affected.
__________________
People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 07:34 PM
iantresman's Avatar
iantresman iantresman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedgebert
Because outside of the event horizion, their gravity is no different than anything else's gravity. If the sun were to suddenly collapse into a black hole, it would have an event horizion of 3 miles (I believe). Earth's orbit would remain unaffected because the total gravity is the same.
So out of interest, what kind of matter might be "sucked into" a black hole which would not be sucked by a pre-black hole mass (ie big sun?) with same gravitational pull?

Regards,
Ian Tresman
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 07:53 PM
wedgebert wedgebert is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,214
Default

Again, the gravitational influence on objects outside of the event horizion would be no different than that of a larger object of the same mass.

The difference is that were non-black holes emit large amouts of radiation. This radiation helps keep objects away from the star. So when a star is born inside a nebula it's going to start pushing the nebula away from it. Whereas the larger a black hole gets, the less radiation it emits. Also, a majority of what the accretion disk releases is typically funneled into jets that shoot out perpendicularly to the disk.
__________________
People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 07:59 PM
dgruss23's Avatar
dgruss23 dgruss23 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 4,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedgebert
Whereas the larger a black hole gets, the less radiation it emits. Also, a majority of what the accretion disk releases is typically funneled into jets that shoot out perpendicularly to the disk.
But wouldn't that be at odds with the standard explanation for quasar luminosities - supermassive black holes.
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 08:24 PM
iantresman's Avatar
iantresman iantresman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedgebert
The difference is that were non-black holes emit large amouts of radiation. This radiation helps keep objects away from the star.
Any idea of the amount of radiation emitted by a sun, compared to the radiation emitted by a black hole at its event horizon?

Regards,
Ian Tresman
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 08:49 PM
wedgebert wedgebert is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,214
Default

A 30 solar mass black hole would have a "temperature" of 2 * 10^-9 Kelvin and would emit 10^-31 watts via Hawking radiation. Hawking temperature is inversely proportional to the mass of the black hole and the Hawking luminosity is inversely proportional to the square of the mass. So a supermassive black hole would be vastly cooler and less luminous.

Compare that to our Sun which gives off 40,000 watts per square inch which works out to 2.43600 × 10^23 watts.

Once black hole eats everything around it, it becomes quite true to it's name.
__________________
People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2004, 09:07 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

You see, a gravitational field's strength decreases with distance from its source (the inverse-square law). Also, in order to get eaten, something has to get beyond the event horizon, as Wedgebert pointed out.

The black hole eventually will eat our galaxy, if it's given enough time. But it would take a while.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today