I bring your attention to the discovery and develop of a paradigm which debunks physics of its bizarre interpretations and misconcpetions.

The essay, Debunking Physics and Discoverying the Ultimate Paradigm of Science and be viewed at http://members.westnet.com.au/paradigm

Stephen Mooney
paradigm@westnet.com.au

Give me ether, make it a double.

The essay appears to be a collection of agitating statements, gross generalizations and good ol'fasioned misinformation. Quite a tangle of fact and fiction.

Make that two, with a numerology chaser.

__________________
"Patriotism is supporting your country all of the time... and your government when it deserves it." - Mark Twain

Other cogent analysis from Stephen Moone, from the Physics Forum:

This reasoning has definitely changed my life!

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

It just goes to show how first appearances can be deceptive.

The paradigm is both generalized and detailed. That's because the Universe is both
generalized and detailed.

The generalization refers to things being constructed form things. This is like a brick
house being constructed with bricks.

The paradigm goes on to specify the bricks and the things which go into constructing the
things which construct the bricks, etc.

The paradigm can not explain everything. It can not explain why the groundstate exists.
But, then, all paradigms have their limitations.

I've just begun applying the paradigm to biogenesis, the formation of a single cell
organism from amino acids.

Did you know that there are four types of habitat within which single cell organism are
formed. I didn't, before I applied the paradigm.

A single cell organism actually acts back on its habitat, creating the environment for its
own evolutionary progression.

We need to take a lesson from single cell organisms.

Welcome to the future of science

Stephen Mooney

Well, I had a bad day and needed a laugh.

Ahhhhh, where's Sam when you need him?

__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

Does this list really have anything to do with science?

Are you telling me that you really don't understand that the paradigm is the ultimate
paradigm of science?

You mean that you don't see that everything is a quantity within the process of the
Universe?

You can't see that the arrows and structure represent the change and progression of things
constructed by the process of the Universe?

Do you not ask questions? Do you not seek answers? Do you not push beyond the
boundary of present knowledge? Do you simply accept everything that physicists claim?
Do you really believe in the existence of anti-matter and massless particles?

Truly amazing. I find ignorance as almost as amazing as knowledge.

Well people, you are obviously in for a big surprise. Try getting more of your neurons
fired-up.

Stephen Mooney

Wow.

Make that three, and mine with some phlogiston... #-o

__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is the world so full of misery?

Oh, I missed the word 'ultimate.' That changes everything.

You've convinced me!

Now to find how to use your diagram to prepare for my meeting today - surely there's something there to show me how to progress...

Yes. Have you bothered reading any part of it before posting your ... stuff?


Why don't you try explaining what it is YOU understand before making assumptions about our understanding?

You mean you don't understand why people are laughing at this mess of assumptions and half-baked theories that you posted?

So do I.

I'm speechless at the irony.

I will say that you've certainly got everyone's attention now, but insulting people isn't the best way to go about promulgating your theory.


P.S. It's spelled "misconceptions."

__________________
Starry, starry night...

My site TheSpacewriter.com
and my blog: TheSpaceWriter's Ramblings

Ouch... Too much sarcasm. #-o

What you need to do in order to make everyone believe you is use The Ultimate Paradigm of Science (tm) to make a prediction about the universe. Predict something that is not currently known and be very very specific. You should be able to do this because, "there is no need to conduct experiments to make scientific discoveries." Anyway, after you make your prediction you can confirm The Ultimate Paradigm of Science (tm) in the eyes of the world by backing up the prediction with observation.

It's that easy.

You know, Einstein predicted that light would be bent by gravity but even he had to prove it observationally by photographing star light during an eclipse. You're going to have to do the same thing. So stop wasting your time posting to Internet forums! Get to work making a prediction.

Wasn't meant as sarcasm. Was meant as dry irony. Perhaps I can go moderate it a bit.

__________________
Starry, starry night...

My site TheSpacewriter.com
and my blog: TheSpaceWriter's Ramblings

While I find several statements in that essay irritating and debatable and even insulting towards science, I'll at least try to approach the the theory itself with a bit of logic and science.

While I don't have a copy of the origianl article, I've just done a little research and familiarized myself on how it was conducted. First up, repulsion? I seriously doubt there was any repulsion observed. If the bar was allowed to swing quite freely then it would end up acting like a pendulum, swinging back and forth with the weight as the center of this motion. I think you've misinterpreted Cavendish's description of this motion. Second, heating increases gravitational attraction? I can't debate this as easily, but I'm gussing it was a some sort of mistake on his part. Since I don't have the article, I can't really say any more on what this mistake might have been. But current physics as I understand it says heating or temperature does not affect gravity (or electromagnetism or any other force). Current physics is also based on experiments and observations carried out by thouands of individuals for hundreds of years. This essay is basically saying that everyone who has studied physics for the past 200 years has missed this supposed effect. I have serious doubts about the possibility of that happening...

I must admit that some aspects of this theory are interesting, but I'm not at all convinced that it is correct in the places where it disagrees with current physics.

and this is the basis of your theory? what emissions?

i'm sorry, but your theory seems a bit long on assumptions and short on facts.

__________________
Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes? -- Groucho Marx

Why does every nutcase fail to use math when they post "alternative" solutions and instead insist on writing page after page of bunk?

Omicron, he gets around that by simply dismissing math and claiming that math is incapable of describing the universe. Here..

But he does employ numerology later in his essay which I found somewhat ironic.

__________________
"Patriotism is supporting your country all of the time... and your government when it deserves it." - Mark Twain

Probably a bit more than the paradigm.


Oh, sorry. I didn't know that little arrows, odd number coincidences, and a bit of numerology could overturn all of science.

Oh yes, I've seen them before. In another coincedence, 345 is about how many other people I have seen come up with some number(s) that for some reason they feel will overturn science. A recent one here is "Ashmore's Paradox" ((tm) and c).


Oh yeah, numbers and arrows change everything.

Yes, yes, no. I would like to know what level of understanding you have of Relativity, QM, and biosciences. After all, if your saying their wrong or connected through your paradigm, you should have a complete understanding of all of the above, just so you know what is wrong.

Well, I will if there is experimental evidence for it. Exactly what experimental evidence do you have? Oh, that's right "there is no need to conduct experiments to make scientific discoveries". So I guess were just supposed to accept what you claim, right?

Well, yes, cause I've studied it. Exactly what is your training in particle physics and Relativity that allows you to throw out concepts that have experimental proof? Oh yeah, that no need for experiments thing.

In some cases, I find it more amazing.

I will and do, when it's worth it.

__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

I actually find it consistent with most people who believe they have "the ultimate answer". Throw out what shows you to be wrong and keep what you think shows you to be right. To me, it's a bigger example of quote mining.

__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.