Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #361 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 06:58 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,514
Default Re: Astrology

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
You look at the orb of Uranus square Pluto for example, then you look at the orbs of any other aspect working against aggression. If these are weak (i.e. large orbs) then they do not have much effect. If they are very strong (i.e small orbs), then they can work to soften the hard aspect, as long as the orb of the hard aspect is not extremely strong.
This paragraph makes absolutely no sense...
  #362 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:14 PM
beskeptical beskeptical is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
I think we have agreed to the fact that astrology is not a science.
Then why do you argue its validity?

If I get out my crystal ball, can I talk you out of some cash? I'm real good at it.

I'm not being sarcastic, I trying to point out your own contradictions. It isn't a science but it is based on observations. You can't have both. Either it is some magical powers astrologers possess or they have developed it over time by observation.

And since I think we agree, they didn't use careful scientific observation, but you believe your horoscope was accurate, then why do you think it was more than a coincidence?

If you wear your hat backwards and the Red Sox win is the curse lifted because of it?
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_
Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting.
  #363 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:25 PM
milli360's Avatar
milli360 milli360 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,464
Default

Quote:
gzhpcu:
(quoting beskeptical)
Quote:
BTW, I think the term is astrologers, not astrologists, since the suffix ist I believe implies scientific study. Linguists, feel free to correct me.
I can only find astrologer in Webster's Dictionary.
Would you accept testimony from an anarchist, or a romanticist, or a novelist, or a lobbyist? "astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
  #364 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:28 PM
Cylinder's Avatar
Cylinder Cylinder is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 1,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milli360
"astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
That comment really made my stomach turn.
__________________
In the progress of this discussion I shall endeavor to give a satisfactory answer to all the objections which shall have made their appearance, that may seem to have any claim to your attention.

Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1
  #365 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:40 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default Re: Re Astrology

Quote:
This is a very important point, I think. gzhpcu, I know you don't represent yourself as the Bad Astrologer, :wink: but do you have any sense of the accuracy of ancient vs. modern predictions
Ancient peoples needed to establish the proper times for planting and harvesting crops and for religious celebrations. The vast majority of mundane predictions about illnesses, accidents, divorces, shipwrecks, earthquakes, scandals, inheritances, marriages, and the like, were utterly useless except to create an addiction to the astrologer whose pronouncements appeared to offer some promise of control over the events in question.

Regarding modern astrology, following quote, from Glenn Perry:
Quote:
Likewise, the traditional astrologer's description of character was generally limited to superficial trait descriptions heavily laden with moral judgments and glib advice. At best, the astrologer confirmed what the individual already intuitively knew. At worst, the astrologer confused or upset the individual with interpretations that were shallow, insensitive, judgmental, overly negative, or just plain wrong. There was little if any attempt to address the deeper dimensions of the chart that hinted at unconscious beliefs and fundamental drives that underlay surface behavior. Character was seen as either static and unalterable, or easily modified by following the cosmically informed counsel of one's astrologer. Such assumptions appear naive from the perspective of modern, depth psychology. We now recognize that while changing one's inborn character can be extraordinarily difficult, it can be achieved through courage, persistence, and hard work.

It was the Swiss psychoanalyst, Carl Jung, who first recognized the vast potential of astrology as a tool for exploring the depths of the human psyche. In various writings throughout his life, Jung made reference to his profound respect for astrology. He asserted that astrology had a great deal to contribute to psychology and admitted to having employed it with some frequency in his analytic work with clients. In cases of difficult psychological diagnosis, Jung would draw up a horoscope in order to have a further point of view from an entirely different angle. "I must say," said Jung, "that I very often found that the astrological data elucidated certain points which I otherwise would have been unable to understand" (1948).


Quote:
Given that distances, sizes, and (except indirectly) compositions don't seem to matter to astrologers, the influences of Pluto and Neptune in astrology are greatly disproportionate to their influences in known physics. Therefore, one can conclude that natal astrology would have become significantly more accurate after 1846 with the discovery of Neptune, and yet more so after 1930 with the discovery of Pluto.
I would think this a reasonable assumption. They were incomplete.
Quote:
Moreover, we can turn the question on its head: both Neptune and Pluto were discovered after they had been predicted via celestial mechanics. It is also legitimate to ask whether the literature of astrology (with which I am entirely unfamiliar) contains any records of corresponding predictions based on observed discrepancies in astrological observations. If so, one would also like to see what similar predictions for the existence of new bodies have been made but disproved, or made but for which the jury is still out.
Not to my knowledge. Someone thought Nostradamus had predicted the existence of Neptune, but this is incorrect.[/quote]
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #366 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:44 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default Re: Astrology

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
You look at the orb of Uranus square Pluto for example, then you look at the orbs of any other aspect working against aggression. If these are weak (i.e. large orbs) then they do not have much effect. If they are very strong (i.e small orbs), then they can work to soften the hard aspect, as long as the orb of the hard aspect is not extremely strong.
This paragraph makes absolutely no sense...
I will try once more. Aspects are strong if they are exact, i.e. 90 degrees exactly for a square. The larger the orb (discrepancy), the weaker the aspect becomes (for example 95 degrees). If you have an exact aspect denoting, say aggression, and a number of aspects which would counter this tendency but have are very weak, then the aspect dentoting aggression will show itself strongly in the character of the person.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #367 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:48 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beskeptical
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
I think we have agreed to the fact that astrology is not a science.
Then why do you argue its validity?

If I get out my crystal ball, can I talk you out of some cash? I'm real good at it.

I'm not being sarcastic, I trying to point out your own contradictions. It isn't a science but it is based on observations. You can't have both. Either it is some magical powers astrologers possess or they have developed it over time by observation.

And since I think we agree, they didn't use careful scientific observation, but you believe your horoscope was accurate, then why do you think it was more than a coincidence?

If you wear your hat backwards and the Red Sox win is the curse lifted because of it?
I argue the point because I have made a large number of horoscopes, most of which I consider to be accurate. I am basing the interpretation of the natal chart on reference books written by Jungian psychologists.

I will say again: Study the methodolgy, try it out, and come to your own conclusion.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #368 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:50 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylinder
Quote:
Originally Posted by milli360
"astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
That comment really made my stomach turn.
Was this an attempt at humor?
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #369 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:50 PM
beskeptical beskeptical is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milli360
Quote:
gzhpcu:
(quoting beskeptical)
Quote:
BTW, I think the term is astrologers, not astrologists, since the suffix ist I believe implies scientific study. Linguists, feel free to correct me.
I can only find astrologer in Webster's Dictionary.
Would you accept testimony from an anarchist, or a romanticist, or a novelist, or a lobbyist? "astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
That's why I said linguists feel free. Oh well, I'll have to add it to my spell checker I guess.
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_
Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting.
  #370 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 07:52 PM
beskeptical beskeptical is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylinder
Quote:
Originally Posted by milli360
"astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
That comment really made my stomach turn.
Oh, now I get it. In other words astrologist wasn't in the dictionary. I must not have had enough sleep last night. :P
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_
Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting.
  #371 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 08:00 PM
beskeptical beskeptical is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
I argue the point because I have made a large number of horoscopes, most of which I consider to be accurate. I am basing the interpretation of the natal chart on reference books written by Jungian psychologists.

I will say again: Study the methodolgy, try it out, and come to your own conclusion.
And I say, test your ideas with valid scientific observation to rule out coincidence and selective interpretation effect and draw valid conclusions.

You continue to assert I would believe if only I tried, or learned more, or looked at the right kind of astrology, or was more open or whatever. Well, your assumptions I have ignored astrology because I don't buy it are wrong. I ignore astrology because I have looked carefully at it, not the other way around.
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_
Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting.
  #372 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 08:02 PM
Cylinder's Avatar
Cylinder Cylinder is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 1,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Was this an attempt at humor?
g + astrologist = stomach doctor
__________________
In the progress of this discussion I shall endeavor to give a satisfactory answer to all the objections which shall have made their appearance, that may seem to have any claim to your attention.

Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1
  #373 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 08:52 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beskeptical
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
I argue the point because I have made a large number of horoscopes, most of which I consider to be accurate. I am basing the interpretation of the natal chart on reference books written by Jungian psychologists.

I will say again: Study the methodolgy, try it out, and come to your own conclusion.
And I say, test your ideas with valid scientific observation to rule out coincidence and selective interpretation effect and draw valid conclusions.

You continue to assert I would believe if only I tried, or learned more, or looked at the right kind of astrology, or was more open or whatever. Well, your assumptions I have ignored astrology because I don't buy it are wrong. I ignore astrology because I have looked carefully at it, not the other way around.
In respect to the first question, I have really ruled out coincidence (just too much to be coincidence) and I have never done selective interpretation. Why would I want to fool myself?

May I ask what you have looked at carefully, and how much time you spent on looking at it.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #374 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 08:55 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylinder
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Was this an attempt at humor?
g + astrologist = stomach doctor
I still don't get it... What should that imply?
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #375 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 09:32 PM
Cylinder's Avatar
Cylinder Cylinder is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 1,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
I still don't get it... What should that imply?
There is no implication, really. It went something like this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by milli360
"astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
Which was (as I took it) a little play on words meaning that the only reference to "astrologist" they could could in the dictionary was contained in the word "gastrologist."

I acknowledged receipt of said joke by the comment:

Quote:
That comment really made my stomach turn.
Which usually means something sickening or offensive, but in this context was just a play off milli360's original comment. Off-topic a bit, but I think it generally fits in with the style on this board (correct me if I'm wrong.)

Seriously though, it really wasn't a jab at you...just poking a little fun at milli360s joke.
__________________
In the progress of this discussion I shall endeavor to give a satisfactory answer to all the objections which shall have made their appearance, that may seem to have any claim to your attention.

Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1
  #376 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 09:54 PM
Candy's Avatar
Candy Candy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Ancient peoples needed to establish the proper times for planting and harvesting crops and for religious celebrations. The vast majority of mundane predictions about illnesses, accidents, divorces, shipwrecks, earthquakes, scandals, inheritances, marriages, and the like, were utterly useless except to create an addiction to the astrologer whose pronouncements appeared to offer some promise of control over the events in question.
Sounds like you are finally getting to the truth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by milli360
Would you accept testimony from an anarchist, or a romanticist, or a novelist, or a lobbyist? "astrologist" is in the dictionary, but it has a "g" in front of it.
Which one are you, milli360? 8-[
  #377 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 03:22 AM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Candy,
The darn thing is that my mind would rather be in this thread debating against my own position. I know that some people have a dependency problem on an astrologer, because they may like the fact of shifting responsibility for problems to some else. I do not belong to this class of people.

This is an area which I really regard as a mystery. I stopped trying to come up with mechanisms to explain how it could possibly work long ago. Why? Because, after really digging it the works of Rober Hand, Liz Greene and others, I really am surprised at the interpretations I have come up with in respect to family members and friends and find it a valuable tool in achieving better inter-personal relations.

A few examples: My mom is the classical latin mama. Horoscope with its strong emphasis on Cancer elements, clearly shows this. My grandfather was a real eccentric and dreamer, and the natal chart shows this clearly (Uranus in the first house, emphasis on Pisces, etc). My ex-boss at work lives only for work and is extremely ambitious (cluster of six planets in 10th house -career) and is very possession/money minded (pluto in 2nd house). A good friend of mine is also obssessively career-minded (pluto in 10th house) always self-critcal and doubtful as to what he has achieved (saturn in 10th house), jovial person (sun conjunct jupiter in 1st house), always squabbles with women (venus square moon), etc. etc. I could go on. I have noticed that the salient characteristic comes out clearly.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #378 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 04:11 AM
milli360's Avatar
milli360 milli360 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,464
Default

teratologist
  #379 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 06:16 AM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re Astrology

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Because the very slow moving planets will be in the same sign for an entire generation, so that the ensuing characteristics derived will apply to an entire generation.
In Jungian, etc. natal astrology, what is the length of time for a generation?
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
  #380 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 11:45 AM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default Re: Re Astrology

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Because the very slow moving planets will be in the same sign for an entire generation, so that the ensuing characteristics derived will apply to an entire generation.
In Jungian, etc. natal astrology, what is the length of time for a generation?
I said a generation but actually if you look back I posted how long Uranus, Neptune and Pluto stay in a given sign (ranges from 12 to about 34 years...). So in some cases it might be more than one generation. Example (source: Palden Jenkins):

Pluto (change) entered Gemini in 1882:
- causes barrage of new ideas (creation vs evoluton, electrical technologies, aeroplane)
Pluto entered Cancer in 1912:
depressions, slumps, insecurity and fear
Pluto entered Leo in 1938:
war, LSD, nuclear explosions
Pluto entered Virgo in 1956:
widespread computer use, nuclear power
Pluto entered Libra in 1971:
marriage institution shook up, enjoy life now and face music later
Pluto entered Scorpio in 1984:
sexual revolution, death of the old
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #381 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 03:56 PM
Taibak Taibak is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 504
Default Re: Re Astrology

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu

Pluto (change) entered Gemini in 1882:
- causes barrage of new ideas (creation vs evoluton, electrical technologies, aeroplane)
Not really. Yes, there was a lot of innovation taking place between 1882 and 1912, but far MORE took place afterwards. Yes, while Pluto was in Gemini you had the automobile, the airplane, evolution, the beginning of quantum mechanics, special relativity, and the harnessing of electric power. On the other hand, the industrial revolution, classical mechanics, electrodynamics, chemistry, thermodynamics, the locomotive, and the steam engine had all been invented prior to 1882. Since 1912 we've had electronics, general relativity, space flight, the computer, more development of quantum mechanics, cosmology, the assembly line, nuclear physics, etc.

Moreover, you're running into a huge historical problem here. As you've said, natal astrology only looks at the configuration of the Solar System at a planet's birth. With the examples you gave, Darwin, Edison, and the Wright brothers were all born before 1882. In fact, Darwin died in 1882.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Pluto entered Cancer in 1912:
depressions, slumps, insecurity and fear
Okay, you had World War I from 1914 to 1918 and Black Tuesday on 1929. On the other hand, the years before WWI and the decade between the two was marked by a tremendous enthusiasm and confidence in the modern age. Similarly, prior to 1914 there was no sense at all that WWI would turn into a bloody, four year mess - it was generally assumed that it would be a quick, glorious war thanks to the strong sense of nationalism (and by extension, security) that pervaded European and American society. As such, we only have 'depressions and slumps' for nine out of 26 years and 'insecurity and fear' for 13 of 26 years.

And, again, the people who would have been participating in most of these activities would have been born prior to 1912.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Pluto entered Leo in 1938:
war, LSD, nuclear explosions
The rise of recreational drugs was in the mid 1960's, four years after Pluto entered Virgo. As such, if you assume that the average hippie was around 18, we're talking birthdates around 1948. What about peole born between 1938 and 1948? Similarly, if Pluto in Leo indicates war, why did we have World War I in the 1910's, and so many wars AFTER 1956 (Vietnam, the Falklands, both Gulf Wars, the various Arab-Israeli wars, the US and Soviet invasions of Afghanistan, civil wars in Lebanon and the Sudan, the Cechen rebellion, civil war in the Republic of Congo....)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Pluto entered Virgo in 1956:
widespread computer use, nuclear power
The first experimental nuclear power plant was operational in 1951. The Nautilus was launched in 1953. Both were before Pluto entered Virgo. Similarly, the first American civilian nuclear plants went online between 1957 and 1959. The people involved were all born before 1956.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Pluto entered Libra in 1971:
marriage institution shook up, enjoy life now and face music later
How was the hedonism of the 70's different than the hedonism of the 60's or 20's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Pluto entered Scorpio in 1984:
sexual revolution, death of the old
All of these were in force throughout the twentieth century, starting with the collapse of Victorian-era social repression in the 1920's. The art deco movement, cubism, and surrealism - all of which predate 1984 - were all conscious breaks with the past. Even the explosion of science fiction in the 20's represents a fascination with the changes brought by science and technology and a clear willingness to break with the past. In other words, 'death of the old' was old news before the 80's, and certainly before people born between 1984 and 2010 will be old enough to start influencing the world.
  #382 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 05:46 PM
gritmonger gritmonger is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 403
Default

As well:
Evolution, or "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection" by Charles Darwin, was published in 1859, and conceptualized in the years before that aboard the Beagle (1831-1836). And, as pointed out, Darwin was born many years before this.

WWI was triggered by an assassination at the tail end of the Anarchist assassination movement - oddly enough starting sometime around 1880's and peaking around 1900...

WWII had its start in 1933, and earlier in post WWI retribution, depression, inflation, and anger. The "Roaring 20's" were in part due to reparations paid to the US and other economies for the war...

I'm concerned about the correlaries drawn from an incomplete and error prone summarization of history, and whether this is the best presentation for evidence.
  #383 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 09:13 PM
Demigrog's Avatar
Demigrog Demigrog is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gritmonger
WWII had its start in 1933, and earlier in post WWI retribution, depression, inflation, and anger. The "Roaring 20's" were in part due to reparations paid to the US and other economies for the war...
Quick correction: The US waved all rights to reparations, though it still benefited indirectly for a few years as European nations partially repaid war debts using their reparations income.
__________________
Do try not to take me too seriously.
  #384 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 09:28 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Astrology

Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzhpcu
Because the very slow moving planets will be in the same sign for an entire generation, so that the ensuing characteristics derived will apply to an entire generation.
In Jungian, etc. natal astrology, what is the length of time for a generation?
I said a generation but actually if you look back I posted how long Uranus, Neptune and Pluto stay in a given sign (ranges from 12 to about 34 years...). So in some cases it might be more than one generation. Example (source: Palden Jenkins):

Pluto (change) entered Gemini in 1882:
- causes barrage of new ideas (creation vs evoluton, electrical technologies, aeroplane)
Pluto entered Cancer in 1912:
depressions, slumps, insecurity and fear
Pluto entered Leo in 1938:
war, LSD, nuclear explosions
Pluto entered Virgo in 1956:
widespread computer use, nuclear power
Pluto entered Libra in 1971:
marriage institution shook up, enjoy life now and face music later
Pluto entered Scorpio in 1984:
sexual revolution, death of the old
Thanks for the alternate "history" lesson.

However my question remains unanswered. To repeat and add detail, in Jungian, etc. natal astrology, what is the length of time for a generation? Most definitions of the length of time of a generation vary between 22 and 33 years. What's the value in Jungian, etc. natal astrology?
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
  #385 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2004, 04:13 AM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Maksutov,
Sorry I can not answer that question at the moment. I do not ever remember having seen any figure quoted in that respect. Will have to look if I find something somewhere, and if I do will post the answer.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #386 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2004, 10:57 AM
Ravana Ravana is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 76
Default

Quick correction to the correction: the US eventually waived rights to reparations... more importantly for the US (and global) economy, the US took even longer to waive repayment of friendly war debt (England and France), and only under strong pressure from its European allies, who resented having to pay back their loans. (Exactly what did they think "loans" were, anyway?) In the meantime, the US economy benefitted enormously... while the European ones were sent into recession, which they tried to defray by collecting their own reparations from the hostile powers, primarily Germany. (What all this had to do with the stars, though, is another question....)

Okay, gzhpcu, I'll take the challenge: Columbus, Ohio; 8 Oct 1966, c.
1:30 AM (sorry I can't get it down better than that; "between 1 and 1:30" is what my mum remembers).

What can you make of that?
  #387 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2004, 12:23 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravana
Quick correction to the correction: the US eventually waived rights to reparations... more importantly for the US (and global) economy, the US took even longer to waive repayment of friendly war debt (England and France), and only under strong pressure from its European allies, who resented having to pay back their loans. (Exactly what did they think "loans" were, anyway?) In the meantime, the US economy benefitted enormously... while the European ones were sent into recession, which they tried to defray by collecting their own reparations from the hostile powers, primarily Germany. (What all this had to do with the stars, though, is another question....)

Okay, gzhpcu, I'll take the challenge: Columbus, Ohio; 8 Oct 1966, c.
1:30 AM (sorry I can't get it down better than that; "between 1 and 1:30" is what my mum remembers).

What can you make of that?
Ravanna,
Let's not consider it a challenge, since this thread is basically dead. Seeing as you are curious, we will take if offline. I'll do your natal horoscope and PM you the results. You can PM back what you think of it. Should you decide to make any comment on this thread, that will be up to you.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #388 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2004, 12:25 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,723
Default

[quote="gzhpcu"]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravana
Quick correction to the correction: the US eventually waived rights to reparations... more importantly for the US (and global) economy, the US took even longer to waive repayment of friendly war debt (England and France), and only under strong pressure from its European allies, who resented having to pay back their loans. (Exactly what did they think "loans" were, anyway?) In the meantime, the US economy benefitted enormously... while the European ones were sent into recession, which they tried to defray by collecting their own reparations from the hostile powers, primarily Germany. (What all this had to do with the stars, though, is another question....)

Okay, gzhpcu, I'll take the challenge: Columbus, Ohio; 8 Oct 1966, c.
1:30 AM (sorry I can't get it down better than that; "between 1 and 1:30" is what my mum remembers).

What can you make of that?
Ravana,
Let's not consider it a challenge, since this thread is basically dead. Seeing as you are curious, we will take if offline. I'll do your natal horoscope and PM you the results. You can PM back what you think of it. Should you decide to make any comment on this thread, that will be up to you.

edited for typo
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #389 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2004, 06:11 AM
Ravana Ravana is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 76
Default

Thanks for the PM, gzhpcu. See my reply.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today