Gentlemen,
I found an article on an online magazine linking NASA to chemtrails.
It can be found at:
http://www.victorthorn.com/babel/issue64/nasa64.html
Let me know what you think

First. Welcome to the BABB, John.

Lisa G. Where would conspiracy theories be with out her? In exactly the same place. I can forgive her inability to argue logically; logic tends not to be a conspiracy theorist's forte. What truely offends me is her lack of originality. Her arguements consists of sarcastically parroting the work of noted thinkers like Bart Siebel. This also makes her sound like a whiney pre-teen, not a thirty-five year old. My rant is now over.

Don't worry, contrails are a natural phenomenon and not a government conspiracy to poison us. I have not read the article she refers to - it's not available online yet. However, it most likely refers to NASA research on contrails after 9/11; with no air traffic, researchers were finally able to get hard data. I very much doubt NASA claims they are anything but natural.

This space.com article talks about the air traffic and the contrails after 9/11.

The New Mexicans for Science and Reason have a good page debunking chemtrails.



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Wiley on 2002-07-01 20:37 ]</font>

<a name="20020702.3:01"> page 20020702.3:01 aka CH2U
On 2002-07-01 20:30, Wiley wrote: To:
First. Welcome to the BABB, John.
Line 4.. the earths serface is about
{currently} 70% water .. I call that for than half
and my understanding is that its
[due to ice melting] becomming "MORE" So?
now caculating ahead .. Lemme see theres
the Next big Ocean Splash {when was that again}
didn't that last one just miss last month
What was its size again. and how huch warter
would it displace if it was the one .. well nevermind
then if I dont know, i'll guess based upon
the Galyear it 1/4 Galyear off in the future
still..if your secret SiFi decoder rings not
currently out of its box thats 60 Million years,, Yeah yeah EXACTLY to the DAY