The paradoxes of physics – part I.

A number of quantum experiments have challenged our common sense for some time. We know that quantum theory, based as it is on the uncertainty principle, leads to a range of mysteries that derive from its mathematical formalism. Examples include the EPR experiment, Schrödinger’s Cat and the Double Slit experiment.

From the QTG, we can see that the vectors of the gravitational field are formed by the inertia vectors generated in the shadows of the electrons when the forces are related to the reference of the atomic nucleus. These vectors are a force without mass, a relativistic residue of the forces that balance the atom after the neutralization of the electric charges.

Considering the new ideas that the QTG offers about the origin of time and space-time, we can resolve these puzzles naturally. When we attribute the generation of gravity, and consequently of time, to atoms, the necessary explanations arise to clear up the mysteries of quantum physics.

……….continue……….

Quantum Theory of Gravity - “QTG”
The Powerful new law of the gravity !!

See the complete text in the following Sites:

http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html
or
http://www.geocities.com/rolfguthmann/

__________________
Quantum Theory of Gravity - “QTG”
The Powerful new law of the gravity !!
http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html

The Double Slit experiment is not just mathematical formalism--the results are real, and have been observed. Similarly for EPR. I'll give you Schrödinger’s Cat

Actually, there are papers about Schrödinger’s Cat-like effects on scales that are usually considered macroscopic (for example, super-position of states of opposite electrical currents).

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)

First, let me say that if you have a hypothesis you'd like to discuss, you are welcome to here. However, you need to read this thread first, as well as the FAQ for this board.

Second, I consider starting five different threads on essentially the same topic to be spamming, which is against the rules. Please keep this to a single thread for now.

__________________
Phil Plait
The Bad Astronomer
http://www.badastronomy.com
badastro@badastronomy.com