The mysterious quantum spin number.

The spin, or intrinsic angular momentum, of a particle is one of the most intriguing numbers in quantum physics. There is, to date, no convincing physical interpretation to explain the function of this quantum number.

The QTG attributes to the spin the temporal property that the particle or object possesses at a certain instant, in relation to the local time carrier or the local present. That is, the spin is associated with the time variable and is a relativistic phenomenon. In 1929, Dirac used the postulates of Schrödinger’s theory, incorporating the relativistic form of the energy equation, and discovered spin. The relation between spin and relativity is identical to that between gravity and the generation of time in the QTG.

In general, we can attribute to objects or particles of full spin 0 a great temporal symmetry in relation to the local time carrier or the local present. Fractional spins (-½, +½, 3/2... etc.), on the other hand, indicate a specific temporal asymmetry. For larger structures, such as atoms, we have the sum of the individual spins, which may result in values that differ by +½ or -½.

We know that the theory of nuclear shells provides that the protons and neutrons in an atomic nucleus will be paired, with a total spin of zero (spin (+½ħ) + spin (-½ħ) = 0), because, according to the Pauli exclusion principle that governs the orbital structure, these two protons or neutrons cannot have all of their four quantum numbers equal. We know that the first three quantum numbers are needed to describe the location in three-dimensional space or the spatial coordinates, while the fourth is needed to describe temporal orientation.

It is simplest for the pairs to achieve temporal symmetry. Imagine two spheres linked by a cord in empty space, monitored by n observation systems distributed equidistantly around them. When these spheres are observed from any angle in three dimensions, the same point of equilibrium can always be found between the spheres for any given observer. Any observation system will always perceive two spheres, with the differences found to be restricted to the distances between them. We discard the case of the observers that, due to the eclipse of one of the spheres, observe a single sphere, because here we have the same equilibrium found in the ideal case of a single sphere.

The point of equilibrium will be the average of the times taken by a hypothetical signal to cover the distance from the spheres to any observer equidistant from the observed system, as was seen for the atom in chapter 4 of the QTG.

On the other hand, if we add a third sphere (or any odd number of spheres), a 3D analysis will never give a point of temporal equilibrium, discarding the two cases in which the system of three spheres is directly in line with the observation system.

It is easier to understand this temporal equilibrium experiment if we imagine a complete external observation system, which defines the local time carrier and imposes this local present on the pair of spheres. ………………continue……………
Quantum Theory of Gravity - “QTG”.
And the Powerful new law of the gravity !!

See the complete text in the following Sites:

http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html
or
http://www.geocities.com/rolfguthmann/

__________________
Quantum Theory of Gravity - “QTG”
The Powerful new law of the gravity !!
http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html