Dear all,

Ever since 1983 I have been sending my theory about the origin of Space to every possible address and to this day I have received no reply. Therefore I would like to draw the attention of the whole world to the fact that there is obviously some kind of "science mafia" that pushes one of the silliest possible theories on this planet about Space being created in the Big Bang from pre-atoms, the size of a pea, and the planetary systems evolved from primordial dust. I therefore consider that the Big Bang happened in their heads and buried their brains under the primordial dust.

I would like to warn all the people in this world that in England one of the most horrific crimes on this planet is taking place. One of the greatest minds in this world, mr. Hawking, is being killed slow but sure by the same people who obviously have the primordial dust in their heads. It was a long time ago that even Einstein claimed that the Big Bang theory sounded more like a religion than science. Several years ago mr. Hawking bashfully announced that the Big Bang theory needed reexamination. Can you imagine this great man, who is as helpless as a child, being tyrannized, abused and scared by a group of parasites gathered around him, and who have made their careers on account of his brains. Can you now imagine how it would seem to this world - and to their pockets - if the theory proved to be nothing but nonsense. Therefore I would like to remind you of my theory, that says that galaxies that have been created in Space shall continue to be created eternally, and the stupid theory about the age of Space of 14.5 billion years means nothing because Space is timeless and spaceless. Time and space exists only in the material Space, i.e. galaxies.

Here I would also like to remind you of the Australian physicist Brown who discovered about 20 gaseous galaxies. Beside the gaseous galaxies that he did find there are gaseous galaxies that he could not see from the sheer reason that in those galaxies there was not enough condensation and core rotation, when due to mighty rotation the core starts to eject matter into Space, because all the matter starts to collide, which leads to combustion and creation of stars. So the Orto's cloud and the cloud "Horse Head" are not the cradles of stars but the cemetery of stars, where due to the peripheral collisions of Andromeda and the Milky Way there comes to mass collisions of old stars formed from the center of the galaxy long time ago. Life in Space should not be sought elsewhere except in the vicinity of dual galaxies, where due to the collisions in nebulas and clouds the solid matter is finally being produced from the gaseous matter and in explosions it flies into space like shrapnels which are then captured by a hydrogen ball, like our Sun. We need to accept the fact that Jupiter, Saturn and Uranium are not part of the classical categorization of the planets of the Solar System.

Regarding the details of what Voyager and Hubble took, as well as the renowned new Geneva theory, where gold core was bombed in a cyclotron and gave them pre-soup deriving from the Big Bang. I believe that for the first time in history they have managed to find intertwined gravitons, as I presented the gravitons in 1983 as short separated threads that under special circumstances bend into V-shape. Then the gravitons started to interconnect and to create the first hydrogen atom. Just see the photo of the pre-soup and imagine the pressure necessary to straighten and disentangle those threads in order to get gravitons again, i.e. for the matter no longer to exist. And that is the reason why the Black hole does not emit any light, because the matter has turned into its original shape, i.e. gravitons.
I am prepared to stand before a jury of true scientists (by that I do not mean those people who just waive their degrees, but have also made some useful contributions to the science) and give a detailed explanation and defend my theory about the origin of Space. I am asking all of those who are using their own heads for just a little bit, and who have obviously until now been under the influence of those who had an explosion of a pea-sized atom in their heads, to contact me. I thank you in advance.
Best regards;
Branko Lesinger
Mobile phone no. +385 91 764 39 05

GRAVITONE SPACE

By Branko Lesinger

The Universe is actually gravitons, and gravitons are the beginning and the end of Space. Their atomic weight is ridiculous, because they are Spatial abstraction. They have no size, no weight, their temperature is a complete zero and their spectrum black.

Einstein said that space is curved, and as far as I know he never explained why, and the reason why it is curved is because the Universe is overstrained and that is why the curving of the space occurs. The results are anomalies during which in certain overstrained centers there comes to a break of gravitons which are actually building blocks of atoms. Gravitons are also a media through which all vibrations i.e. radiations are being transmitted, light and other radiations. Due to Space being curved measuring the galactic distances via red shift no longer corresponds to the real situation. The astronomers claim that at a certain distance of light years the Universe stops and there is nothing but empty space further. But that is not correct because further on there are also galaxies but their lights just have not reached us yet. There is also a theory based on the background radiation discovery, as well as the theory on temperature differences that allegedly support the Big Bang theory. But those two things actually support a totally different thing; and that is that the galaxies are constantly being created in space. Big Bang explosion, i.e. pre-atoms would need to have created incredible temperature, as well as the pressure, in which case we would not exist today. It is well known that the percentage of hydrogen in space is about 99%, and in such a Bang would be 99% before Uranium. And thus the creation of the planets around the Sun happened in no dust condensing, but it is a work of the collision of stars, which we might be able to notice today hiding behind the cloud called Horse Head. From such cloud blocks are flying into space capturing with their gravity hydrogen balls like our Sun. And that is how the planetary systems are created. Venus arrived to our planetary system much later and it is still getting cold. In the far future Venus will be much like our planet. The comets are deriving from the same area, some are captured by our star, and some go rushing into open Space. I have sent this theory in 1983 to Carl Sagan and have complemented certain parts of it, as for instance temperature differences and background radiation.

The core of the galaxies is water i.e. ice.
The formula is (graviton) A+ (energy)
B=C (matter)
That is the formula of creating the hydrogen with cold fusion,
ie creation of matter,
ie space
ie galaxies.

From 1983 I am trying to publish bat I did not have answere , only NASA wrote to me that they accept theory only from them students, to the Mr Hawking I send many years but I did not have any answere becouse of some bad people around him, and this bad people had realy big influence on Mr Havkig. I also think Mr Havking is injured by that bad people .Only in croatia My theory was publisshed in magazine STELA, but my homeland Croatia is known as ignorance people and I can not do nothing here in Croatia. Mr Hawking say that he is not for THEORY of BIG BANG in Dublin, I realy hope that maybe you have some conections, or some people where I can publish My Theory, If you can do that please write to me, I baging you , plese publish My theory in my name like my friend if you can.

I hope that you will write to me very soon

Branko,

Have you considered the possibility that your 'theory' isn't a theory? That it is not only inconsistent with good theories (some parts of which you build your own ideas from, some you arbitrarily discard), but also very likely internally inconsistent?

Perhaps the moderators will move this thread to 'Alternative Theories' and we may discuss it further?

If you delete any reference to conspiracy people will take more notice of you

dr hawkins has muscular dystrophy a muscle disease that is not caused by poisons etc.

Once anyone says there is a conspiracy they are totally ignored by sane people as they will not believe you and so you are ignored by the very people you are trying to help you.

I have no doubt if any of your theory is shown to be true from actual repeatable observations then a serious look at it will occure.

Cold fusion has been shown to be a experiment that seems to be unable to be repeated as is many other things such as antigravity machines or such claims.

The scientific community is still open minded about the big bang theory--- Its only a theory that has to be disproven--

Dr Hawkins may have his doubts but as any good scientist he only says this so that the scientific community will keep their minds open to other ideas so no conspiracy just no evidence.

Most evidence is that stars dont collide and i think i read where two galaxys passed through each other and due to the immense space between each star there was no indications of any collisions.

So if you want to prove any of your theory then you have to
break it down to a repeatable observation and prove that first, then as any scientist does, build up from there proving each step as you go.

Proposing a theory is lateral thinking

Proveing it is where science takes over

__________________
inventing and writing forum
You dont know how little you know.
till you know enought
to know that you still know nothing

Yep definately needs to be moved. Done.

__________________
All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct.~ Carl Sagan ~

Humanity must rise above the Earth, to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only then will we fully understand the world in which we live.~Socrates, 500 B.C. ~

Let every man judge according to his own standards, by what he has himself read, not by what others tell him. ~Albert Einstein~

I don't think you need to worry about someone else trying to put their name on your theory.

__________________
Forming opinions as we speak

:unsure: The probabilaty of Matter being captured by our sun as it woffled past our solar system is highly speculative. Not imposable, but not the most likly scenario. The only part of your theory that I find exeptable is the likly hood of gasiouse matter being in a compresion as a resolt of galactic colision. The chances of stellar colision is unlikly. This compresion may be the triger for new star formation.
So Jupiter Satern Uranus. the gas giants are where they should be., and are part of the solar system they were born in.
If a strong gravatational force was to disterb this solar system. None of the planats would have the near sercular orbits they do. They would I assume be in very eliptical paths or gone.
I am not part of that group of english scientests that you are concerned about. I sagest you forget that idea. its nonsence. I wish no ill on Mr Hawking, the man is a God., but hes not a well chap. We are fortunate he has completed so much work of such importantance to the scientific community, astronomy.
The langage you have used makes it difacult to understand what you are actually saying. Your efforts are interesting. English is not my best subject. We have this in common. I will look forward to your next letter.

Not to nitpick, but the correct term is "hypothesis".

__________________
The funny thing about Newton is that he wasn't proven wrong; he was proven inaccurate.

It was his danged inability to throw apples at relativistic speeds toward the ground.

Yeah.

How is this plausible?

Hi Branko.
Could you write your theory, that we may discuss about it ?
The Big Bang theory is not completed yet, there are some doubts still.

What do you mean to “gravitons”?
How are the hydrogen clouds created ?
How is the matter created from energy ?
I have some of this problems in my web site, if you have time - http://bencieszyn.w.interia.pl/antimatter/...matter-ang.html