|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
This relates to a topic that a previous thred veered off into (but I don't have the time or patience to try to find it [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_redface.gif[/img] ) dealing with genetic diversity and how humans have interfered with the natural process of evolution by selective breeding and stuff like that.
Anyway, this study deals with tracing the genetic history of dogs to find where and when they originated. http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science...gin/index.html
__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece |
|
|||
|
Neb, it will be really hard to give this thread any kind of astronomical dimension, but it is interesting. Why do you suppose we have been able to introduce through selective breeding such a wide diversity of forms in the common dog, canis familiaris?
Although I know they are, when I look at a chihuahua and a bull mastiff, it's hard to see that they're the same species. I'd guess if these two extreme ends of the dog scale don't interbreed (and just try to visualize how they'd do so [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] ) they will in time become different species entirely, incapable of even artificially induced breeding. If we remember that the divergent traits were natural mutations that were amplified through selective breeding, it appears that dogs have an unusually large mutation rate. We don't, for example, see the same divergence among the breeds of domestic cats, even though, presumably there was just as much incentive to create them. Any ideas how to tie this topic to astronomy? (Added by edit) Isn't there a Dog Star - I don't mean Lassie or Rin Tin Tin, but a celestial object? (Looking for any shred of legitimacy for this thread.) <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DaveC on 2002-11-22 12:14 ]</font> |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I wonder what the Russians would have put in Sputnik 2 if we hadn't created small dogs? Imagine the scratches they'd get trying to lock a kitty in there! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
With respect to the selective breeding, different breeds started at different times. The one breed I know a lot about, Great Danes, emerged about 1100 AD in Germany. Other breeds can be traced as far back as the Roman Empire. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
This article should clear a few things up about the origins of dogs and wolves.
http://www.grapevine.net/~wolf2dog/wayne2.htm BTW, dogs can breed with wolves, foxes, coyotes, and even jackals, yet all are distinctly different. Still, dogs are closest to gray wolves genetically. |
|
||||
|
Just to fuel the fire--in many states, my own included, it is illegal for veterinarians to vaccinate wolves or wolf crosses, primarily because there is no dependable research to insure that the type of rabies virus used will not actually cause the disease in a wolf. In other words, when push comes to shove, it looks like some experts don't want to stake their reps (or public health) on saying that wolves and domestic dogs are the same species. Of course, many disease outbreaks in domestic dogs (like parvovirus) can be traced to contact with coyotes, wolves, etc., but so can humans get monkey b virus from monkeys.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Gethen, that's interesting info about the rabies vaccine. I'm due to take my dog in for his annual immunization this week. I plan to ask the vet whether that's an issue here. We have a fairly large local population of coyotes which are becoming quite "cityfied". Undoubtedly there are lots of dog/coyote crossbreeds showing up at vet clinics. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
????????? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img] |
|
|||
|
Random observation: it took ten million years of natural selection to get from something that looked like a rat all the way to a wolf. It only took humans about 1000 years to turn wolves into chihuahuas.
Talk about progress, eh? |
|
||||
|
Chihuahuas are probably the most useless breed of dogs.. Even the other toy dogs at least have fur so they don't freeze to death outside in summer.
Where exactly did the ancestor of house cats come from? The closest thing I have seen are the few types of jungle cats in South America. -Colt
__________________
Be not afraid of any man no matter what his size; when danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece |
|
|||
|
For any breed of dog, there are some people out there that think it's wonderful. I'm not big on chihuahuas either (and about a dozen other breeds I could name). But then, I have an Old English sheepdog, also very unwolflike except in size perhaps, and I suspect that's not everyone's cup of tea either.
I think the point is, we have manipulated the poor wolf six ways from Sunday and created a whole host of weird variations. I'm still curious as to how that was possible in such a short time. We sure haven't made the same dramatic changes to any other creature. Cows at least bear some passing resemblance to their ox ancestors. Cats still look like cats - even though I'm not sure where the domestic cat arose initially. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Once bread has become toast, it can never become bread again... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
[Pictures cows srouting out of the ground across the field] Well, I gues if you can have cow pies, you can have cow plants!? Edit: changed the tease to something more amusing, or at least I think it is . . . . _________________ "Once again, we find that science is a two-headed beast. One head is nice, . . . but the other head of science is bad! Oh beware the other head of science, Arthur, it bites!" - The Tick vs. Dinosaur Neil <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: nebularain on 2002-11-28 21:09 ]</font> |