Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 06:50 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,357
Default Quantum mechanics is wrong?

Fuel's paradise? Power source that turns physics on its head

Quote:
It seems too good to be true: a new source of near-limitless power that costs virtually nothing, uses tiny amounts of water as its fuel and produces next to no waste. If that does not sound radical enough, how about this: the principle behind the source turns modern physics on its head.
...
What has much of the physics world up in arms is Dr Mills's claim that he has produced a new form of hydrogen, the simplest of all the atoms, with just a single proton circled by one electron. In his "hydrino", the electron sits a little closer to the proton than normal, and the formation of the new atoms from traditional hydrogen releases huge amounts of energy.

This is scientific heresy. According to quantum mechanics, electrons can only exist in an atom in strictly defined orbits, and the shortest distance allowed between the proton and electron in hydrogen is fixed. The two particles are simply not allowed to get any closer.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 06:57 PM
Vermonter's Avatar
Vermonter Vermonter is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Republic of Vermont
Posts: 1,173
Send a message via AIM to Vermonter
Default

It does indeed go against conventional QM. It's never been observed that you can coax an electron any closer to a hydrogen atom. The idea of set orbits is very well founded. This is where peer review comes into play. If his theory is sound, then QM has to be changed. If it gets shot down, then he needs look at why it failed.

But if what he says is true, why haven't we seen this before? A lower orbit is ideal for any atomic structure. Hydrogen atoms are always at a ground state unless they are excited. Hmm...
__________________
"4th Law of Modern Thermodynamics: Where Mihoshi is, Chaos Reigns." ~W. Hakubi
"Gun control is hitting your target; Recycling is reloading your brass." ~ Lex of Dirty Work.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 08:15 PM
Eta C's Avatar
Eta C Eta C is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Heart of Darkness
Posts: 1,697
Default Bunk, bunk, bunk,

And more bunk. Not even wrong.

Mills has been around a while and his claims to have discovered a "below ground state" form of hydrogen have been debunked many times. The physics world is "up in arms" about this only in his imagination. He's an MD who got into this after the cold "fusion" fiasco of 1989. His "Black Light Power Company" did manage to get a patent for this, but frankly, that doesn't impress me (or other scientists). What does impress me is that he managed to bilk a couple of power companies to invest in this hair-brained scheme.

For a few takes on this, here's some links to Bob Park's (the author of Voodo Science) What's New page.

October 2000
This one contains the following quote. Mills, it appears, is not above a little plagerism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Park
Fortunately, Aaron Barth (not to be confused with Erik Baard, the Randy Mills' apologist), has taken upon himself to look through it, checking for accuracy. Barth is a post doctoral researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Institute, and holds a PhD in Astronomy, 1998, from UC, Berkeley. What he found initially were mathematical blunders and unjustified assumptions. To his surprise, however, portions of the book seemed well organized. These, it now turns out, were lifted verbatim from various texts. This has been the object of a great deal of discussion from Mills' Hydrino Study Group. Mills seems not to understand what the fuss is all about.
June 2002
February 2000
And there are several more entries from that time period (go to What's New and do a search on "hydrino"

Parks devotes several pages to Mills in Voodoo Science (132-135). At this point, Mills is either badly mistaken, or a long way down the road from foolishness to fraud. What he isn't is correct.
__________________
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind." - William Thompson, 1st Baron Lord Kelvin

"If it was so, it might be, and if it were so, it would be, but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!" - Tweedledee

This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. - Wolfgang Pauli
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 08:58 PM
swansont swansont is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Washington, DC USA
Posts: 1,496
Default

I recall when I looked into this a few years back, the BlackLight website listed some claims of energy being released in some reactions. One problem was they never explained how much was predicted by the hydrino model, and how their experiments matched up. All was consistent with exothermic chemical reactions involving normal hydrogen.

Move along. Nothing to see here.
__________________
"I have a cunning plan that cannot fail."
S. Baldrick
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 09:33 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 19,106
Default

Here is a link to the Blacklight's website on their process. Supposedly, they take hydrogen gas and use "a filament to dissociate it into hydrogen atoms". They then add some sort of catalyst to convert the hydrogen atoms into hydrinos. They also talk about hydrogen plasmas at various points, so I'm more than a little confused as to whether they are talking about neutral hydrogen or a plasma.

If that was true, that there was a lower energy state than the ground state, wouldn't hydrogen atoms sometimes just fall to the ground state on their own, without a catalyst - I don't recall that this has ever been observed.

Looking at the energies they are pumping into this, to dissociate hydrogen, I suspect that the hydrogen is really not in a ground state, and that they are just watching the electron fall to a lower energy state from a much higher state. I suspect if you really did an energy balance, that more energy is going into dissociating the hydrogen than you are producing for the whole thing.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 09:38 PM
ZaphodBeeblebrox's Avatar
ZaphodBeeblebrox ZaphodBeeblebrox is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Henniker, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,599
Send a message via AIM to ZaphodBeeblebrox Send a message via Yahoo to ZaphodBeeblebrox
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift
Here is a link to the Blacklight's website on their process. Supposedly, they take hydrogen gas and use "a filament to dissociate it into hydrogen atoms". They then add some sort of catalyst to convert the hydrogen atoms into hydrinos. They also talk about hydrogen plasmas at various points, so I'm more than a little confused as to whether they are talking about neutral hydrogen or a plasma.

If that was true, that there was a lower energy state than the ground state, wouldn't hydrogen atoms sometimes just fall to the ground state on their own, without a catalyst - I don't recall that this has ever been observed.

Looking at the energies they are pumping into this, to dissociate hydrogen, I suspect that the hydrogen is really not in a ground state, and that they are just watching the electron fall to a lower energy state from a much higher state. I suspect if you really did an energy balance, that more energy is going into dissociating the hydrogen than you are producing for the whole thing.
And if Not ....

Then, they're Probably, Just Inducing OXIDATION!!!
__________________
If you Ignore YOUR Rights, they Will go away.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2005, 11:52 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Mmmm... This looks bullogus to me.

Let's see if this invention can actually produce any power...
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 11:26 AM
JohnD JohnD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,808
Default

All,
Where could we expect to see hydrogen atoms falling spontaneously into a hydrino state? Not in a star, certainly not in the observable outer layers where there is so much energy about. How about in deep space? There, hydrogen can be detected at a typical radiation wavelength (21cms?). Excuse my ignorance, but isn't this radiation from electrons passing from a higher to a lower energy state?

Surely a hydrogen-hydrino conversion will radiate at a different wavelength? Is this predictable and can we detect any such radiation from hydrogen clouds in space?

Just trying to think 'science' and 'testable hypothesis', rather than authoritarian senior scientist.
John
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 01:52 PM
Weird Dave Weird Dave is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 411
Default

I'll believe this if and only if he can generate power with it (or rather, an independent party could use his process to generate power - not that I suspect that Mills may cheat, of course...) I'd also like a decent explanation of why his process has never occured naturally, and some investigation of his waste products. Creating a never-before-seen type of hydrogen and releasing it into the environment sounds rather dangerous to me. Not to mention non-renewable. Does the hydrino ever return to being normal hydrogen?

Put me down as a sceptic.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 03:55 PM
Eta C's Avatar
Eta C Eta C is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Heart of Darkness
Posts: 1,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
All,
Where could we expect to see hydrogen atoms falling spontaneously into a hydrino state? Not in a star, certainly not in the observable outer layers where there is so much energy about. How about in deep space? There, hydrogen can be detected at a typical radiation wavelength (21cms?). Excuse my ignorance, but isn't this radiation from electrons passing from a higher to a lower energy state?

Surely a hydrogen-hydrino conversion will radiate at a different wavelength? Is this predictable and can we detect any such radiation from hydrogen clouds in space?

Just trying to think 'science' and 'testable hypothesis', rather than authoritarian senior scientist.
John
Well, that's the point. There is no evidence for a "lower than ground" state of hydrogen. All of the observed hydrogen spectra from any source you care to mention (including interstellar space) are consistent with the predictions of standard QM. The hypothesis was tested long before Mills came along and it was beyond wrong right from the start. Thus the authoritative dismissal. Mills is proposing a solution for which there is no problem.
__________________
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind." - William Thompson, 1st Baron Lord Kelvin

"If it was so, it might be, and if it were so, it would be, but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!" - Tweedledee

This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. - Wolfgang Pauli
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 01:46 AM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default Forget the hydrino...

... Meet the doofusino!

(Sorry, couldn't help it.)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 03:03 AM
Tensor Tensor is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sarasota Fl
Posts: 3,888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eta C
The hypothesis was tested long before Mills came along and it was beyond wrong right from the start.
Don't you mean "this isn't even wrong".
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

Neptune- The original Dark Matter.

The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 04:18 AM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,171
Default

This smells extremely bad.

It should not require millions or billions in gullible investments into a secret process if more energy can be squeezed out of an atom. This is the type of research that must be conducted out-in-the-open to have any merit: Don't worry Dr. quack, no one who ever makes such a breakthrough will ever be denied anything and everything this world has to offer.
__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 03:42 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 19,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
All,
Where could we expect to see hydrogen atoms falling spontaneously into a hydrino state? Not in a star, certainly not in the observable outer layers where there is so much energy about. How about in deep space? There, hydrogen can be detected at a typical radiation wavelength (21cms?). Excuse my ignorance, but isn't this radiation from electrons passing from a higher to a lower energy state?

Surely a hydrogen-hydrino conversion will radiate at a different wavelength? Is this predictable and can we detect any such radiation from hydrogen clouds in space?

Just trying to think 'science' and 'testable hypothesis', rather than authoritarian senior scientist.
John
Hydrogen gas, plasmas, molecular beams, etc. have been studied for decades in physics and chemistry labs. I have not read every paper ever written about hydrogen spectroscopy, but I feel comfortable stating that such a transition (to a
hydrino) has never been observed.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 07:15 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,171
Default

Another thought - and more fundamental:

The mathematics of quantum mechanics are empirically or phenomenologically derived - meaning the rules are derived from the observations, and not the other way around.

This means, almost by definition, it is impossible to mathematically challenge quantum mechanics without observational data that either contradict, or are poorly explained by existing theory.

So the proof must be demonstrated by observed behavior that is clearly at odds with, or transcend quantum predictions.
__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 08:13 PM
akirabakabaka akirabakabaka is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 510
Default

For anyone interested in the published research:

Classical Quantum Mechanics (Mills, 2003)

A critical analysis of the hydrino model (Rathke, 2005)

(spoiler alert!)

"Most importantly, we found that CQM does not predict the existence of hydrino states!"

oops.
__________________
there is no governor anywhere
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 08:29 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 19,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akirabakabaka
For anyone interested in the published research:
A critical analysis of the hydrino model (Rathke, 2005)

(spoiler alert!)

"Most importantly, we found that CQM does not predict the existence of hydrino states!"

oops.
Nice work akirabakabaka. I also liked...
Quote:
In practical terms this inconsistency of the theory means that the model cannot describe the electron motion in a hydrogen atom with nonminimal angular momentum. Note that the electron states with non-zero angular momentum are well-described in standard quantum mechanics. Hence CQM lacks important features of quantum mechanics and does not describe known physics properly.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 09:52 PM
steve1 steve1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: california
Posts: 23
Default

Seems like it's time for another 'Woo-Woo Credo" link. Anyone?
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-November-2005, 12:34 AM
trinitree88 trinitree88 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,258
Default hydrino polywater

Circa 1970-71, there was a big stir over "polywater", and if it got loose in the oceans, it would polymerize them all...(ruining water sports, fishing, and of course the ecosytem..). Maybe the hydrinos could be incorporated into the polywater, and we could have the incredible shrinking blob movie, with people in cruise liners, submarines, trapped divers, whales, sharks,all together...we just need some smaller "oxygenos" to make it all work. Hollywood here we come. Ciao. Pete.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-November-2005, 01:41 AM
akirabakabaka akirabakabaka is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 510
Default

It's called "Ice-9" in Kurt Vonnegut's 1963 novel Cat's Cradle, and it literally turns the earth's oceans solid instantaneously. Entertaining story
__________________
there is no governor anywhere
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-November-2005, 10:29 AM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 9,287
Default

There was another story where a plymer leaked and formed a film over the ocean surface stopping evapouration, don't remember who that was by though.
__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-November-2005, 12:54 PM
Paul Mitchell's Avatar
Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Guildford, England
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trinitree88
Circa 1970-71, there was a big stir over "polywater", and if it got loose in the oceans, it would polymerize them all...(ruining water sports, fishing, and of course the ecosytem..). Maybe the hydrinos could be incorporated into the polywater, and we could have the incredible shrinking blob movie, with people in cruise liners, submarines, trapped divers, whales, sharks,all together...we just need some smaller "oxygenos" to make it all work. Hollywood here we come. Ciao. Pete.

Quote:
Originally Posted by akirabakabaka
It's called "Ice-9" in Kurt Vonnegut's 1963 novel Cat's Cradle, and it literally turns the earth's oceans solid instantaneously. Entertaining story
Actually no. Polywater was a real example of pathalogical science (irreproducible results, phenomena only at the limits of observability, etc), whereas Vonnegut's ice 9 was purely fictional.

Although there are clear similarities
__________________
"I come from London, a small village on Mars just outside the capital Wibble."
Captain Edmund Blackadder
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-November-2005, 01:42 PM
Tensor Tensor is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sarasota Fl
Posts: 3,888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Mitchell
Actually no. Polywater was a real example of pathalogical science (irreproducible results, phenomena only at the limits of observability, etc), whereas Vonnegut's ice 9 was purely fictional.

Although there are clear similarities
Actually, although Vonnegut's Ice 9 is fictional, there is an actual Ice IX. (Ice, so far, goes up to Ice XII)
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

Neptune- The original Dark Matter.

The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-November-2005, 02:59 PM
Paul Mitchell's Avatar
Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Guildford, England
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tensor
Actually, although Vonnegut's Ice 9 is fictional, there is an actual Ice IX. (Ice, so far, goes up to Ice XII)
Nice phase diagram. Ah that takes me back...
__________________
"I come from London, a small village on Mars just outside the capital Wibble."
Captain Edmund Blackadder
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today