The Solar system: an Open Star Cluster remnant.

It is assumed that the Solar system represent the remnants of a former Open Star Cluster. The newly formed stars in an open Star cluster are supposed to be formed, if the always growing central star, which is fed by local in-falling gas at the white hole location becomes rotational unstable by its growing mass content. The in-falling gas should be explained as the result of the pressure effect by the complex Local A-Symmetric Oscillating vacuum Frame (LASOF) located in between the SABHs. It is assumed that the rotational instability of the growing central star will originate the splitting of the star into two smaller stars, one star will maining at the white hole center and the other (more metal rich) star is supposed to leave the scene.

Repetition of this process will originate an ever growing number of Single and Binary stars as long as there is enough infalling gas from outside. These stars are supposed to migrate out of the center by the attraction of the dual Stellar Anchor Black Holes SABHs) located on both sides of the central White Hole location. If all the local Gas and dust is consumed, the Open star Cluster will die as a production plant for stars. However it is assumed that one of the stars of the last produced stars, will split into "metal rich" and "metal poor" Planets due to the rotational centrifugal effect of the splitting of process.

The metal rich nucleus of one star of the last Binary could migrate out of the center of the star and leave smaller Planets and "failed stars" behind. This could be the main origin of our Planetary system which show also metal poor and metal rich Planets. Jupiter and Saturn are metal poor Planets and often called "failed Stars", which seem to be well chosen. As a consequence, the Sun can be interpreted as the last central primordial open cluster star.

An Nasa Astrophysics Data System search reveals too many to list, so here is an abstract from one recent article:

Evidence for a Developing Gap in a 10 Myr Old Protoplanetary Disk
Authors:
Calvet, Nuria; D'Alessio, Paola; Hartmann, Lee; Wilner, David; Walsh, Andrew; Sitko, Michael

Journal:
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 568, Issue 2, pp. 1008-1016. (ApJ Homepage)
Publication Date: 04/2002

Abstract
We have developed a physically self-consistent model of the disk around the nearby 10 Myr old star TW Hya that matches the observed spectral energy distribution and 7 mm images of the disk. The model requires both significant dust-size evolution and a partially evacuated inner disk region, as predicted by theories of planet formation. The outer disk, which extends to at least 140 AU in radius, is very optically thick at infrared wavelengths and quite massive (~0.06 Msolar) for the relatively advanced age of this T Tauri star. This implies long viscous and dust evolution timescales, although dust must have grown to sizes of the order of ~1 cm to explain the submillimeter and millimeter spectral slopes. In contrast, the negligible near-infrared excess emission of this system requires that the disk be optically thin inside <~4 AU. This inner region cannot be completely evacuated; we need ~0.5 lunar mass of ~1 ìm particles remaining to produce the observed 10 ìm silicate emission. Our model requires a distinct transition in disk properties at ~4 AU separating the inner and outer disks. The inner edge of the optically thick outer disk must be heated almost frontally by the star to account for the excess flux at mid-infrared wavelengths. We speculate that this truncation of the outer disk may be the signpost of a developing gap due to the effects of a growing protoplanet; the gap is still presumably evolving because material still resides in it, as indicated by the silicate emission, the molecular hydrogen emission, and the continued accretion onto the central star (albeit at a much lower rate than typical of younger T Tauri stars). Thus, TW Hya may become the Rosetta stone for our understanding of the evolution and dissipation of protoplanetary disks.


Observations such as the above seem to support the current model of solar system formation. What specific problem exists with the current theory of solar system formation that leads you to suggest your model as an alternative? Can you point to some specific observational evidence in favor of your model? What is the origin of this stellar anchor blackhole/white hole concept?

It must be possible to detect these two black holes, because they will deform the stellar background.
As is psoposed , these black holes will have a distance of about 1 lightyear, which is pritty close.