Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 04:11 AM
Colt's Avatar
Colt Colt is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Empire of Alaska
Posts: 1,424
Send a message via ICQ to Colt Send a message via MSN to Colt
Default

I know this is sort of a touchy subject but I wanted to start a poll on it.

Here are the terms of this poll (yes, I am dictating terms here [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]):

1. At the top of your post please state KBO or Planet, leave a blank line after this.

2. You can post up to two paragraphs of text expressing your view on the subject, say anything that you wish as long as it is within the guidelines set down by the BA in the BABB rules.

These terms are liable to change at the collective wish of posters (or by Mr. Plait's godlike powers) at any time. The reason for these terms is that I do not want this to turn into a debate about the subject, just a poll to determine the common opinion. At the end of one week, next monday (03/03/'03), I will tally the count and post it.

My reason for making a poll is that the last few discussions that I have seen on the Pluto planet/KBO topic have turned into debates with no real settlement at the end.
-Colt


KBO

_________________
"Ultimately it is man who must take responsibility for his actions, not his science or machines."
Pondering the universe one quark at a time.http://www.geocities.com/wandererofthewastes/index.html

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Colt on 2003-02-24 23:12 ]</font>
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 04:15 AM
g99 g99 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kingdom of Florida
Posts: 2,918
Send a message via AIM to g99
Default

I see i inspired someone. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 05:10 AM
nebularain's Avatar
nebularain nebularain is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central MD
Posts: 2,049
Default

KBO! KBO! KBO!

1. Awkward orbit from the rest of the planets.

2. Terrestrial planet, terrestrial planet, terrestrial planet, terrestrial planet, asteroid belt, gas giant, gas giant, gas giant, gas giant, iddy-biddy-icy-planet amidst the Kuiper Belt? No, makes more sense for it to just be a very large KBO.

3. Sems to be of the same composition of the other KBO's ("dirty iceballs").

__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 05:44 AM
irony irony is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 438
Send a message via AIM to irony
Default

KBO! They're much cuter and cuddlier than planets, and their name is more fun to say!

- Irony, back at the RAO and high on caffeine, this time courtesy of hot Mt. Dew. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif[/img] How the hey did an observatory run out of coffee? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]

__________________
"Went all the way to the Gap of Rohan only to discover that there is no Gap in Rohan... not even a Banana Republic!"
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 07:16 AM
traztx traztx is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 561
Send a message via Yahoo to traztx
Default

Planet

I would choose "KB-Planet" if that was an option.

Or how about KB-Buckle?
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 07:42 AM
DaveOlden DaveOlden is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 229
Send a message via MSN to DaveOlden
Default

Meekly puts my hand up...

Er, sorry, but I'm new to the term "KBO"...

(My google search has so far turned up "Knowledge Based Organization" and it's the name of an eastern European rock band... doubt those are it...)


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DaveOlden on 2003-02-25 02:46 ]</font>
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 07:49 AM
DaveOlden DaveOlden is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 229
Send a message via MSN to DaveOlden
Default

Got it.

Kuiper Belt Object.

will vote after I learn myself in this...
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 07:58 AM
JS Princeton JS Princeton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Princeton
Posts: 2,189
Send a message via AIM to JS Princeton
Default

KBO

But it's still special.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 08:12 AM
DaveOlden DaveOlden is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 229
Send a message via MSN to DaveOlden
Default

KBO

This is tentative. It's dissimilarity to the outer gas giants, it's orbital eccentricity (which has long suggested the word 'adopted' to me) and it's apparent similarity to KBO's .. all lead me to nod toward the KBO side of the question.

My first two reasons are the strongest. If it was closer to the plane of the ecliptic (if I'm correct in taking the meaning of "plane of the ecliptic" to be the orbital reference plane of the Solar System) and didn't cross over Neptune's orbit I might be more inclined* toward planet.

(*) pun intented.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DaveOlden on 2003-02-25 03:13 ]</font>
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 09:56 AM
Mainframes's Avatar
Mainframes Mainframes is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 654
Send a message via MSN to Mainframes
Default

KBO

Based on it's odd eccentricity and inclination. I never really thought of it as a proper planet anyway, even before I heard of the arguements about it's status.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 10:26 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,148
Default

KBO

Makes it easier for me when my little son asks me, why after the gas giants suddenly another thing smaller than Mercury appears... [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

On the other hand, http://www.nineplanets.org/ is a handier url than http://www.eightplanetsandakbo.org/ [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

Harald
(typos fixed)

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kucharek on 2003-02-25 05:27 ]</font>
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 11:36 AM
kilopi's Avatar
kilopi kilopi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,815
Default

It's a definition. And right now, it's defined as a planet.

By any reasonible definition of planet, it would seem to be a planet. See this thread, and discussion about an article in the August 2002 Sky and Telescope.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 12:40 PM
lazygun lazygun is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Default

KBO


Because thats what it is.
__________________
If I'm so bad then why don't they take me away
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 12:43 PM
WHarris WHarris is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 565
Default

Planet.

Because that's what it is. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 12:49 PM
informant informant is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,975
Default

A planet.


I understand the opposite view, too: if Pluto is a planet, why aren't Ceres and Vesta too?
Well, in a word: tradition. In order to justify that Pluto is not a planet, you would have to come up with an objective definition of what a planet is. I haven't seen one yet.


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: informant on 2003-02-25 09:41 ]</font>
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 01:22 PM
kilopi's Avatar
kilopi kilopi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,815
Default

Quote:
On 2003-02-25 07:49, informant wrote:
I understand the opposite view, too: if Pluto is a planet, why aren't Ceres and Vesta too?
Well, in a word: tradition. In order to justify that Pluto is not a planet, you would have to come up with an objective definition of what a planet is. I haven't see one yet.
We (at least, I and a previous incarnation) have tried to come up with objective criteria--but one certainly has to decide on cutoff points.

Isn't Ceres a tenth the size of Pluto?
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 02:07 PM
SeanF's Avatar
SeanF SeanF is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 6,030
Default

Planet.

I agree with Kilopi on the definition issue.

[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

__________________
SeanF

"Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher

The contents of this post are ©2009 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 02:35 PM
Zathras Zathras is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan, with Texas still in my heart
Posts: 520
Default

It isn't definitely one or the other. It is just a question of semantics. You can't make a categorical difference--it's just a question of degree.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 02:50 PM
kilopi's Avatar
kilopi kilopi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,815
Default

Quote:
On 2003-02-25 09:35, Zathras wrote:
It isn't definitely one or the other. It is just a question of semantics. You can't make a categorical difference--it's just a question of degree.
Could we say that your post is just an answer of semantics? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 04:44 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 128
Default

Provisional K.B.O. Very provisional. AARRRGGGGG. Pluto “visits” both the system proper and the Kuiper belt.

Check it out; http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~nowack/ge...r/image048.jpg


We’re certainly not the first group to chase this dog around the tree.

http://mips.as.arizona.edu/~stansber/Planet.html

Pluto currently enjoys duel status because it possesses characteristics of both K.B.O.’s and planets. How about “Unincorporated plometesmal”? Pluto+comet+leftover building blocks. Or maybe “Pluton”? Pluto+Triton. After all, they are pretty darn similar.


http://www.lpi.usra.edu/research/outerp/triplu.gif


Well, the pic isn’t the best, but I’m sure you know what I mean. Their similarities outweigh their differences.


Colt.


Just re-read the options at the start of your poll. Straight answer with no window dressing. AARRRGGG.


K.B.O.
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 04:47 PM
DoctorDon DoctorDon is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: University of Michigan
Posts: 221
Default

KBO
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 05:24 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clear Lake City, TX
Posts: 4,485
Default

Planet.

Call me a traditionalist.

Besides: http://www.brunching.com/morepluto.html

Now, how can you argue with that?
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
Isaac Asimov
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 05:34 PM
kilopi's Avatar
kilopi kilopi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,815
Default

Quote:
On 2003-02-25 11:44, Heathen wrote:
Pluto currently enjoys duel status
I don't think so. I think its status remains as a planet--there was a suggestion that it have duel status, but nothing came of it.
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 06:22 PM
maryellenandtom maryellenandtom is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 38
Default

KBO

Some years back there was a humorous scientific article about Pluto. Maybe in J. Irreproducible Results in the 1970s. It was a graph of the decreasing mass of Pluto, starting with the pre-discovery predictions, and going down through the discovery of Charon as a separate object.

The author drew a line and extrapolated to zero mass, predicting that Pluto would disappear around the year 2000!

If anyone remembers this and can post the citation, it would be appreciated.
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 06:48 PM
kilopi's Avatar
kilopi kilopi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,815
Default

I remember it well, it was on one of my advisors's doors, I think. But I can't seem to find anything online.
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 09:15 PM
Zap Zap is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 166
Default

KBO all the way. Still hard with tradition and all, but I mean come on it's among so many other bodies of its kind. If another KBO as large or larger than Pluto is discovered, I think that would answer the debate itself.
__________________
-Zap
If you didn't like the opinions expressed in this post, get over it!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 25-February-2003, 09:39 PM
kilopi's Avatar
kilopi kilopi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,815
Default

Quote:
On 2003-02-25 16:15, Zap wrote:
If another KBO as large or larger than Pluto is discovered, I think that would answer the debate itself.
I would tend to agree--but, in the mean time, there ain't one close.
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 26-February-2003, 02:27 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 128
Default

kilopi.


“I don't think so. I think its status remains as a planet--there was a suggestion that it have duel status, but nothing came of it.”


I stand corrected. And this is going to play hell with designations in the future. Suppose we confirm that it is compositionally identical to K.B.O.’s………are we then trapped into saying all K.B.O.’s are actually planets?
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 26-February-2003, 03:00 AM
Colt's Avatar
Colt Colt is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Empire of Alaska
Posts: 1,424
Send a message via ICQ to Colt Send a message via MSN to Colt
Default

"..I do not want this to turn into a debate about the subject, just a poll to determine the common opinion."

No debate, start another thread if you wish. -Colt
__________________
Be not afraid of any man no matter what his size; when danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 26-February-2003, 03:08 AM
Dickenmeyer Dickenmeyer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: McCordsville, IN
Posts: 332
Default

Planet

Conventional usage, it's spherical and not just a hunk of rubble, it's bigger than any KBOs yet found and it has it's own satellite. It's like the fight between taxonomic lumpers and splitters in biology, there aren't many true dividing lines, one thing just shades into another so you pays yer money and takes yer pick. Maybe I'm just old fashioned, I like analog watches too.
__________________
If you can't dazzle 'em with dexterity, baffle 'em with BS.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today