|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I know this is sort of a touchy subject but I wanted to start a poll on it.
Here are the terms of this poll (yes, I am dictating terms here [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]): 1. At the top of your post please state KBO or Planet, leave a blank line after this. 2. You can post up to two paragraphs of text expressing your view on the subject, say anything that you wish as long as it is within the guidelines set down by the BA in the BABB rules. These terms are liable to change at the collective wish of posters (or by Mr. Plait's godlike powers) at any time. The reason for these terms is that I do not want this to turn into a debate about the subject, just a poll to determine the common opinion. At the end of one week, next monday (03/03/'03), I will tally the count and post it. My reason for making a poll is that the last few discussions that I have seen on the Pluto planet/KBO topic have turned into debates with no real settlement at the end. -Colt KBO _________________ "Ultimately it is man who must take responsibility for his actions, not his science or machines." Pondering the universe one quark at a time.http://www.geocities.com/wandererofthewastes/index.html <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Colt on 2003-02-24 23:12 ]</font> |
|
|||
|
KBO! They're much cuter and cuddlier than planets, and their name is more fun to say!
- Irony, back at the RAO and high on caffeine, this time courtesy of hot Mt. Dew. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif[/img] How the hey did an observatory run out of coffee? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif[/img]
__________________
"Went all the way to the Gap of Rohan only to discover that there is no Gap in Rohan... not even a Banana Republic!" |
|
|||
|
Meekly puts my hand up...
Er, sorry, but I'm new to the term "KBO"... (My google search has so far turned up "Knowledge Based Organization" and it's the name of an eastern European rock band... doubt those are it...) <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DaveOlden on 2003-02-25 02:46 ]</font> |
|
|||
|
KBO
This is tentative. It's dissimilarity to the outer gas giants, it's orbital eccentricity (which has long suggested the word 'adopted' to me) and it's apparent similarity to KBO's .. all lead me to nod toward the KBO side of the question. My first two reasons are the strongest. If it was closer to the plane of the ecliptic (if I'm correct in taking the meaning of "plane of the ecliptic" to be the orbital reference plane of the Solar System) and didn't cross over Neptune's orbit I might be more inclined* toward planet. (*) pun intented. <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DaveOlden on 2003-02-25 03:13 ]</font> |
|
||||
|
KBO
Makes it easier for me when my little son asks me, why after the gas giants suddenly another thing smaller than Mercury appears... [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img] On the other hand, http://www.nineplanets.org/ is a handier url than http://www.eightplanetsandakbo.org/ [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img] Harald (typos fixed) <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kucharek on 2003-02-25 05:27 ]</font> |
|
||||
|
It's a definition. And right now, it's defined as a planet.
By any reasonible definition of planet, it would seem to be a planet. See this thread, and discussion about an article in the August 2002 Sky and Telescope. |
|
|||
|
A planet.
I understand the opposite view, too: if Pluto is a planet, why aren't Ceres and Vesta too? Well, in a word: tradition. In order to justify that Pluto is not a planet, you would have to come up with an objective definition of what a planet is. I haven't seen one yet. <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: informant on 2003-02-25 09:41 ]</font> |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Isn't Ceres a tenth the size of Pluto? |
|
||||
|
Planet.
I agree with Kilopi on the definition issue. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
__________________
SeanF "Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher The contents of this post are ©2009 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Provisional K.B.O. Very provisional. AARRRGGGGG. Pluto “visits” both the system proper and the Kuiper belt.
Check it out; http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~nowack/ge...r/image048.jpg We’re certainly not the first group to chase this dog around the tree. http://mips.as.arizona.edu/~stansber/Planet.html Pluto currently enjoys duel status because it possesses characteristics of both K.B.O.’s and planets. How about “Unincorporated plometesmal”? Pluto+comet+leftover building blocks. Or maybe “Pluton”? Pluto+Triton. After all, they are pretty darn similar. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/research/outerp/triplu.gif Well, the pic isn’t the best, but I’m sure you know what I mean. Their similarities outweigh their differences. Colt. Just re-read the options at the start of your poll. Straight answer with no window dressing. AARRRGGG. K.B.O. |
|
||||
|
Planet.
Call me a traditionalist. Besides: http://www.brunching.com/morepluto.html Now, how can you argue with that?
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity. Isaac Asimov |
|
|||
|
KBO
Some years back there was a humorous scientific article about Pluto. Maybe in J. Irreproducible Results in the 1970s. It was a graph of the decreasing mass of Pluto, starting with the pre-discovery predictions, and going down through the discovery of Charon as a separate object. The author drew a line and extrapolated to zero mass, predicting that Pluto would disappear around the year 2000! If anyone remembers this and can post the citation, it would be appreciated. |
|
|||
|
KBO all the way. Still hard with tradition and all, but I mean come on it's among so many other bodies of its kind. If another KBO as large or larger than Pluto is discovered, I think that would answer the debate itself.
__________________
-Zap If you didn't like the opinions expressed in this post, get over it! |
|
|||
|
kilopi.
“I don't think so. I think its status remains as a planet--there was a suggestion that it have duel status, but nothing came of it.” I stand corrected. And this is going to play hell with designations in the future. Suppose we confirm that it is compositionally identical to K.B.O.’s………are we then trapped into saying all K.B.O.’s are actually planets? |
|
||||
|
"..I do not want this to turn into a debate about the subject, just a poll to determine the common opinion."
No debate, start another thread if you wish. -Colt
__________________
Be not afraid of any man no matter what his size; when danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize. |
|
|||
|
Planet
Conventional usage, it's spherical and not just a hunk of rubble, it's bigger than any KBOs yet found and it has it's own satellite. It's like the fight between taxonomic lumpers and splitters in biology, there aren't many true dividing lines, one thing just shades into another so you pays yer money and takes yer pick. Maybe I'm just old fashioned, I like analog watches too.
__________________
If you can't dazzle 'em with dexterity, baffle 'em with BS. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|