Well, he is a professor at the
California Institute of Integral Studies, which doesn't give a lot of confidence to me (when looking at their introducition, mission statement, ...). For the rest, it looks to me like pure
astrological bunk: if you look at hist list of 20th century disasters happening under a Saturn-Pluto conjunction, I notice the absence of the whole of WWII, and the very bizarre inclusion of the birth of the Columbine shooting students and so on. This is typical; when something happens, it is because of the conjunction. If no conjunction is near, it is because the guilty ones were born at the time of one. Seeing that this was the 6th (at least: 1914-15, 1929-30, 1946-48, 1964-1967, 1981-1984, 2001-...) such conjunction of the last hundred years, and they all last a few years, then it would be tough not to find a match.
Another example is this:
Quote:
25) The galvanizing of the will, a sense of stern purposefulness, grim determination.
The man of steel., the archetypal mother in the throes of the birth labor—the superhuman effort of contraction and determination in the service of a life-and-death cause. Cf. the firefighters and police entering the towers and climbing to their deaths out of duty and service to others. "The iron will of the ironworkers laboring at Ground Zero" (NBC News).
|
Now it isn't when you are born that is important: you just get an iron (or steel, all the same) will by doing something during such a conjunction. Easy, isn't it?
In fact, when looking at that article, we notice events related to Saturn-Pluto in 1914-1916, 1921-1924, 1929-1932, 1939-1941, 1943, 1946-1948, 1956, 1961, 1964-1967, 1973, 1981-1984, 1989, 1992-1994, 2001-2003: this makes for 36 of 90 years, or more than a third. It would be hard not to find matches with such a wealth to choose from...