|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
With this in mind I expact further development related to Sharon's situation on or around December 21 this year and the threat against Syria will become unmistakenly on or around February 14, 2007. |
|
|||
|
That is essentially meaningless. What could "possibly happen" is anything that is possible. I thought that this dimensionality you speak of was going to distinguish between all the things that could possibly happen and the things that will happen.
The 2 things you mention are way too vague. Far too many events surrounding Sharon or Syria could be made to fit your statement. For example, I expect further developments in Iraq on or around January 15th would be meaningless drivel. It's similar to how horoscopes are drawn up. You have examples of specific predictions you made prior to an event occurring? Please give just a few.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective. "Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley |
|
|||
|
The difference is, that I'm anticipating on the situation related to the Hariri killing/ Syria since the summer of last year. I'm not doing exact predictions, I try to identify the hidden underlying timecoded patterns. I expected related developments on specific dates and I have anticipated on these developments in the past. Everything is collected in a thread called 'The Hariri Killing, Casus Belli WWIII ?' Maybe one should read the thread first to get the idea, but it's not my objective to draw readers to the HDDesign forum, it's just that it's all explained there.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Your refusal (or inability) to give or stick to specifics is all I need to know about Hyperdimensionality.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective. "Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley |
|
|||
|
That's fine with me, don't invest your time if you don't want to know
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
The UN report accused Syria of being involved with the Hariri killing. On each following determined Hyper Dimensional date that followed, I have posted anticipations and I expected Hariri/Syria related development at each anticipated HD date. ( can be verified on several forums) Indeed there were Hariri/Syria related developments on each anticipated HD date. This hariri killing seems to be the initial trigger of a war scenario and I have been saying that since more than a year. Related events will continue to materialize on the anticipated HD dates in the future. There's an underlying nuclear threat present. This Syria situation is to be the first step in an evolving war scenario with US-Korea and or China-Taiwan conflicts on the triggers further down the line, closely related to the determined hyperdimensional dates. The Hariri killing will be recognized afterwards as the start the evolving conflict. |
|
|||
|
What? No winning lottery numbers? Do the powers that be forbid such disclosures, or is this just another bushel basket full of nonsensical ramblings? This is a thinly disguised 'Nostradamus' scam. Given enough nonsense, you might eventually assemble a baloney sandwich. This argument is the poster child for bad science.
|
|
|||
|
U.N. probe IDs Hariri suspects
POSTED: 0201 GMT (1001 HKT), December 12, 2006 UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- The U.N. inquiry into the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri has now identified suspects and witnesses and found possible links to 14 other murders or attempted murders in Lebanon in the last two years, the chief investigator said Tuesday. full article CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/me....ap/index.html It looks like this Hariri/Syria situation is entering a critical phase. The evolving situation has been monitored and anticipated here: The Hariri Killing, Casus Belli WWIII ? http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic...forum=hddesign |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Even that is being very, very, very, very generous. It's the most Nancy Leiderlike stuff I've seen since, . . . Nancy Leider.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective. "Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Microsoft is over if you want it. The bar has been lowered for the promotion of ATM ideas; the bar for the acceptance of ATM ideas must remain high. |
|
||||
|
Dutch, the problem with your predictions is that they aren't being compared with the number of similar events that happened on other days. The Middle East is a volatile area and there will be many significant events. What are the odds that the prediction is correct just by chance?
To make this a workable theory, you need to a) make a specific and precise prediction, and b) ensure that only one outcome would satisfy the prediction. So saying that there will be newsworthly things happening in the Middle East on Dec. 14th is no use. Picking the winning lottery numbers would be a far better example (but I accept this might not be available through your system).
__________________
Spike :) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
One must investigate first ofcourse, I guess not everyone who's applying here has done that, but hey, I'm not scientific either ![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
[quote=Celestial Mechanic;883190]"Paradigma swift"? I think you probably meant "paradigm shift". KA-CHINGG!!! That's ten points off for gratuitous use of the phrase "paradigm shift".
[/QUOTEMaybe it is a very fast moving paradigm. Hyperdimensionality can do that ya know.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective. "Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley |
|
|||
|
Quote:
key developments related to the Hariri/Syria situation have happenend repeatedly on anticipated pre-determined dates. |
|
||||
|
You can tell us all you like about predictions you made in the past that have come true since; we have no way of knowing if that's true or not. What we are asking for is a prediction that you make now about what is going to happen later, not a prediction you say you've made at some point that's about something that happened in the past.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |