Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1141 (permalink)  
Old 02-April-2007, 09:52 AM
djellison djellison is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
Do you think I will be able to come back when I can prove the multi dimensional universe?
Comeback when you've more to tell us than astrology and bull****.


Doug
  #1142 (permalink)  
Old 02-April-2007, 01:24 PM
Dutch Dutch is online now
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 666
Default

Michael:
Quote:
await a reply from Dutch as to what conversation he would expect on his thread.
I would like to focus on future HD dates and anticipations on timecoded patterns. I think it should be limited to that initially
  #1143 (permalink)  
Old 02-April-2007, 03:11 PM
farmerjumperdon farmerjumperdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 3,905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
You can make up your mind how future events will develop if you take the time. Actually you are wasting your time with asking for proof and the like.
If that doesn't say it all.

"You can make up your mind how future events will develop . . ." Someone is going to decide future events based on their interpretation of movements of bodies thru space? I know that is what you've been advocating all along. It's just that you keep saying it in new ways that make it sound even more wacko all the time.

And yes, you have proven several things for certain; that asking you for evidence is a waste of time, that asking you to be objective is a waste of time, that asking you to use terminology recognized by others is a waste of time, that your understanding of terms like research, anticipation, dimension, etc are radically different than most everybody else on this board.

I still can't decide whether you are seriously deluded, all-out psychotic, an incredibly patient prankster, just somebody looking for their 15 minutes of fame, a really really Bad Scientist, a wannabee visionary leader, or some combination of the above.

Your obfuscating jargon is also at times your own worst enemy. Reminds me of how Nancy L. dug a huge hole with outrageous claims. You have been careful to commit to very little though, and it is that cleverness that leads me to lean towards Wannabee Visionary Employing Really Bad Science.

I think this thread should end in a poll (it's obviously going nowhere but in circles, and will stay that way for as long as you keep posting). We should do a poll to see the category of woo-wooism to which the board's population feels you are most closely aligned.

BTW, even though it is tough to see such twisted ideation coming from a fellow human, this has been at times a source of good amusement too. Sometimes you gotta take the bad with the good.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective.

"Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley
  #1144 (permalink)  
Old 02-April-2007, 03:13 PM
farmerjumperdon farmerjumperdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 3,905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
Michael:


I would like to focus on future HD dates and anticipations on timecoded patterns. I think it should be limited to that initially
Right, we wouldn't want to try to actually make sense out of anything, . . . initially.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective.

"Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley
  #1145 (permalink)  
Old 02-April-2007, 04:21 PM
Michael Noonan's Avatar
Michael Noonan Michael Noonan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Deep in thought
Posts: 1,631
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
Michael:


I would like to focus on future HD dates and anticipations on timecoded patterns. I think it should be limited to that initially

I can't help much here, all I have is a set of events and the only one significantly different in this brane of existence I am aware of happened 36 years ago at the crossing of Fortune Street and Glyde Street in Narrogin Western Australia.

I doubt if any time resident signature is left even though at the time it should have been about a mile across. Also I see structure and mostly find people insignificant. I doubt that I can be of any help. But if it is any help this year 2007 is a pivotal year.

Cheers

Respects to farmerjumperdon I know I am not on the same plane as others. But it is because of this event that I have restricted what I say to just a very few ideas the tip of the iceburg if you like.
  #1146 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 07:19 AM
Dutch Dutch is online now
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmerjumperdon View Post
If that doesn't say it all.

"You can make up your mind how future events will develop . . ." Someone is going to decide future events based on their interpretation of movements of bodies thru space? I know that is what you've been advocating all along. It's just that you keep saying it in new ways that make it sound even more wacko all the time..
Someone is going to decide future events based on their interpretation of movements of bodies thru space? I never said that, its way off. I don't think we are consciously aware of the fact that we co-create this reality somehow. Nobody can 'decide' future events, its the result of our state of collective consciousness ( at macro level). It is possible though, that if this concept is indeed valid, that people with knowledge of the system could try to manipulate, but we still have a shared responsibility how our reality will look like

Quote:
And yes, you have proven several things for certain; that asking you for evidence is a waste of time, that asking you to be objective is a waste of time, that asking you to use terminology recognized by others is a waste of time, that your understanding of terms like research, anticipation, dimension, etc are radically different than most everybody else on this board.
yep

Quote:
I still can't decide whether you are seriously deluded, all-out psychotic, an incredibly patient prankster, just somebody looking for their 15 minutes of fame, a really really Bad Scientist, a wannabee visionary leader, or some combination of the above.
use your fantasy, its not on the list yet

Quote:
Your obfuscating jargon is also at times your own worst enemy. Reminds me of how Nancy L. dug a huge hole with outrageous claims. You have been careful to commit to very little though, and it is that cleverness that leads me to lean towards Wannabee Visionary Employing Really Bad Science.
I always said i don't make exact predictions, I think Nancy L did although I haven't read her stuff

Quote:
I think this thread should end in a poll (it's obviously going nowhere but in circles, and will stay that way for as long as you keep posting). We should do a poll to see the category of woo-wooism to which the board's population feels you are most closely aligned.
Its not fair to do a poll. I know most people will dismiss it. easy exit isn't it?
You should take the time to see how the anticipations will work out

Quote:
BTW, even though it is tough to see such twisted ideation coming from a fellow human, this has been at times a source of good amusement too. Sometimes you gotta take the bad with the good.
yes
  #1147 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 08:05 AM
djellison djellison is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 818
Default

A poll as to how many people think there is anything to HDD is a forgone conclusion.

What would be interesting is a poll to see how many people think that continued discussion of HDD should take place here.

Doug
  #1148 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 09:01 AM
Dutch Dutch is online now
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djellison View Post
A poll as to how many people think there is anything to HDD is a forgone conclusion.

What would be interesting is a poll to see how many people think that continued discussion of HDD should take place here.

Doug
That's also not fair. you can just let it rest if you don't like it
I will focus on the material
  #1149 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 11:37 AM
djellison djellison is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 818
Default

Why is it not fair? It's perfectly fair. It couldn't be more fair.

You have presented your 'material' (which is actually, no material at all ) and your theory has been rejected by the overwhelming majority here. You made your case, it has been answered as not valid, the case is now closed. You can't keep bashing on posting the same nonsense month after month after month. It makes you - and BAUT, look ridiculous.

What you talk about is an against the maintstream subject that lies outside the scope of astronomy, and in a thread that has gone on for far too long in this place. It breaches BAUT rules to be honest. You are lucky that it has not be closed already.

There is a place for discussion of this stuff - you have mentioned it several times. Go there. Discuss it at length. Not here.
  #1150 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 12:47 PM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
I am willing to defend, I thought you people have had it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
That's also not fair. you can just let it rest if you don't like it
I will focus on the material
Based on these comments and the direction the thread has taken in the last few days, I'd like to see it moved into the ATM section. Maybe lock this one and start up a new one there. Either way, it's pretty clear that this has gone in circles for far too long. If this is going to turn into just another depository for anticipations that can be found on the other forums across the net, then there is no need to leave it open.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.

Last edited by Tog_ : 03-April-2007 at 12:48 PM. Reason: forgot to add second quote
  #1151 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 12:48 PM
Dutch Dutch is online now
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djellison View Post
Why is it not fair? It's perfectly fair. It couldn't be more fair.
you know it take time to monitor the Syria situation for instance. There are also other timecoded patterns outlined here. Why don't you just take the time to see how it will work out or let it rest. You just don't like the thought that there could be truth in these kind on concepts. There's much more needed to dismiss it than the arguments that have been posted here.

Quote:
You have presented your 'material' (which is actually, no material at all ) and your theory has been rejected by the overwhelming majority here.
that doesn't mean it isn't true. I expect everybody will reject it initially.

Quote:
You made your case, it has been answered as not valid, the case is now closed. You can't keep bashing on posting the same nonsense month after month after month. It makes you - and BAUT, look ridiculous.
right, answered as not valid. so it is closed. because you think so.
I think our attention is needed in relation to the HD dates that are coming up.
I don't care less if I look ridiculous, that's what I can expect.

If you don't make me react on these kind of posts, I would limit my contributions to support the validity of the concept only.

Quote:
What you talk about is an against the maintstream subject that lies outside the scope of astronomy, and in a thread that has gone on for far too long in this place. It breaches BAUT rules to be honest. You are lucky that it has not be closed already.
its in babbling so it doesn't breaches BAUT rules. To put it in ATM would mean an easy exit aswell.

I have no problem with leaving here, the forum owner just has to ask it and I'm gone
  #1152 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 01:01 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Guy 'predicting the future' using "Hyperdimensional Design"





Huh, what?

Uh, this HDD nonsense is still going on?

What a waste of electrons.

Well, anyway...



__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
  #1153 (permalink)  
Old 03-April-2007, 10:12 PM
djellison djellison is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 818
Default

This thread should be moved to ATM and thus closed in 30 days, during which Dutch can continue to ignore the simple questions asked of him and then never speak of it here again.

Doug
  #1154 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2007, 02:29 AM
Serenitude's Avatar
Serenitude Serenitude is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Ohio
Posts: 2,422
Send a message via MSN to Serenitude
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djellison View Post
This thread should be moved to ATM and thus closed in 30 days, during which Dutch can continue to ignore the simple questions asked of him and then never speak of it here again.

Doug
This has been discussed, and I have been fence-sitting on the verge of doing so for the last week or so If anyone has a convincing arguement yay or nay, please PM me. I would like the official input (not that I can't guess) of those involved in the discussion before pulling the trigger.
__________________
"I have this theory that the Apollo missions were faked when NASA found out that general relativity was wrong because the Earth was expanding due to the Sun's iron core being influenced by magnetic waves from the electric universe after being perturbed by Planet X and thereby causing global warming. Where should I start a thread about this?" ~ ToSeek

"Those are the people that wonder how a thermos knows whether to keep something hot or keep something cold." ~ NeoWatcher
  #1155 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2007, 06:53 AM
Dutch Dutch is online now
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 666
Default

moving to ATM is end of thread for me, its not possible in 30 days
  #1156 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2007, 07:16 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
moving to ATM is end of thread for me, its not possible in 30 days
If you would have taken the steps explained in the thread it would have been over by now anyway. The main point that was asked, repeatedly, was that you show a higher number of related events on the days of the predictions than the rest of the time. This would have shown that our opinions that you were only looking at the dates chosen and seeing what you wanted to see were flawed. You didn't do that.

A secondary point was that no one but you seems to be able to judge what is or is not a valid synchonicity. What everyone here sees as totally meaningless coincidence, you seem to see as some sort of absolute proof. If no one can see it but you, then your system is not a design, but an intuition.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.
  #1157 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2007, 09:26 AM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Guy 'predicting the future' using "Hyperdimensional Design"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
moving to ATM is end of thread for me, its not possible in 30 days
Aw, that's terrible. The finis of open-ended ramblings. Aww...



Important note: none of the following is meant to be even close to an ad hominem. It's all ad rem.

I'm sure Dutch is a fine person who just has some unusual ideas. Therefore what follows is only a series of observations based on the material Dutch has posted here since, it seems, the beginning of time.

OK.

Excuse me for being blunt, Dutch, but, in the ATM section, you would be held accountable for your claims. If that's too much for you to handle, then that really puts your entire realm of speculations into the proper light, doesn't it?

Not that most of us didn't already discern that.

What a burden, not being able to explain in plain language, or better yet, with math and logic, the tenets of your hypothesis in thirty days or less...

Not the entire hypothesis, just the tenets.



Have you ever had to defend your thesis in front of a committee whose job is to shoot down any weakness in your dissertation? Based on what you've presented here, it seems unlikely.

If you were in fact going for a post-graduate degree with the material you've presented in this thread and the complete lack of supporting, verifiable objective evidence, the school, if properly accredited, would probably be tempted to pull your baccalaureate.

Out of curiosity, before this thread gets deservedly closed, what does your family (you have mentioned in numerous posts that you spend a lot of time with them, care for them, and look out for their welfare) think of your speculations? Just wondering if others share your "insights" or if (more likely) you're the only person who takes such stuff seriously.

Meanwhile, a bit of career advice. Since you've said you do most of this "work" while on the job, watch out. If you get a new manager who's interested in productivity, you might be out there in the job market before you know it.

One way or the other, I wish you luck. And I really hope you decide to learn something about the scientific method.


PS: Note to the moderators: I realize some of this might have seemed to be harsh, but, I've found this thread to be something of an embarrassment re its being on a science board.

I can see a newbie checking in, reading this thread, and thinking,
Quote:
Huh, this is supposed to be one of the outstanding astronomy bulletin boards on the web? Man, the material in this thread seems to indicate just the opposite. I saw that the forum title was Off Topic Babbling, but, wow, there have to be limits for even such an open set of topics. Especially considering the fact that this turbid thread has been allowed to exist for so long. I think I'll go elsewhere for some serious astrophysics discussions.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
  #1158 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2007, 09:42 AM
Dutch Dutch is online now
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog_ View Post
If you would have taken the steps explained in the thread it would have been over by now anyway. The main point that was asked, repeatedly, was that you show a higher number of related events on the days of the predictions than the rest of the time. This would have shown that our opinions that you were only looking at the dates chosen and seeing what you wanted to see were flawed. You didn't do that.
as explained, I have a focus on the HD dates at macrolevel and keydates on already identified possibly timecoded patterns. Ofcourse I don't look for Deep Impact correlations everyday, but when the Chinese hit a satellite on a Deep Impact triggerdate it is different, at least to me.

Quote:
A secondary point was that no one but you seems to be able to judge what is or is not a valid synchonicity. What everyone here sees as totally meaningless coincidence, you seem to see as some sort of absolute proof. If no one can see it but you, then your system is not a design, but an intuition
A synchronicity is personal. i have stated repeatedly that such synchronicities will also pop up when you start to work or investigate these concepts seriously. I don't know how long it takes, it took a long time for me.
  #1159 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2007, 10:15 AM
Medusa's Avatar
Medusa Medusa is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Default

<