|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Michael:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
"You can make up your mind how future events will develop . . ." Someone is going to decide future events based on their interpretation of movements of bodies thru space? I know that is what you've been advocating all along. It's just that you keep saying it in new ways that make it sound even more wacko all the time. And yes, you have proven several things for certain; that asking you for evidence is a waste of time, that asking you to be objective is a waste of time, that asking you to use terminology recognized by others is a waste of time, that your understanding of terms like research, anticipation, dimension, etc are radically different than most everybody else on this board. I still can't decide whether you are seriously deluded, all-out psychotic, an incredibly patient prankster, just somebody looking for their 15 minutes of fame, a really really Bad Scientist, a wannabee visionary leader, or some combination of the above. Your obfuscating jargon is also at times your own worst enemy. Reminds me of how Nancy L. dug a huge hole with outrageous claims. You have been careful to commit to very little though, and it is that cleverness that leads me to lean towards Wannabee Visionary Employing Really Bad Science. I think this thread should end in a poll (it's obviously going nowhere but in circles, and will stay that way for as long as you keep posting). We should do a poll to see the category of woo-wooism to which the board's population feels you are most closely aligned. BTW, even though it is tough to see such twisted ideation coming from a fellow human, this has been at times a source of good amusement too. Sometimes you gotta take the bad with the good.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective. "Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley |
|
|||
|
Right, we wouldn't want to try to actually make sense out of anything, . . . initially.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective. "Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You should take the time to see how the anticipations will work out Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I will focus on the material |
|
|||
|
Why is it not fair? It's perfectly fair. It couldn't be more fair.
You have presented your 'material' (which is actually, no material at all ) and your theory has been rejected by the overwhelming majority here. You made your case, it has been answered as not valid, the case is now closed. You can't keep bashing on posting the same nonsense month after month after month. It makes you - and BAUT, look ridiculous. What you talk about is an against the maintstream subject that lies outside the scope of astronomy, and in a thread that has gone on for far too long in this place. It breaches BAUT rules to be honest. You are lucky that it has not be closed already. There is a place for discussion of this stuff - you have mentioned it several times. Go there. Discuss it at length. Not here. |
|
||||
|
Based on these comments and the direction the thread has taken in the last few days, I'd like to see it moved into the ATM section. Maybe lock this one and start up a new one there. Either way, it's pretty clear that this has gone in circles for far too long. If this is going to turn into just another depository for anticipations that can be found on the other forums across the net, then there is no need to leave it open.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares. A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar. A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks. She might. You never know. Last edited by Tog_ : 03-April-2007 at 12:48 PM. Reason: forgot to add second quote |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think our attention is needed in relation to the HD dates that are coming up. I don't care less if I look ridiculous, that's what I can expect. If you don't make me react on these kind of posts, I would limit my contributions to support the validity of the concept only. Quote:
I have no problem with leaving here, the forum owner just has to ask it and I'm gone |
|
||||
![]() Huh, what? Uh, this HDD nonsense is still going on? What a waste of electrons. Well, anyway... ![]()
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If anyone has a convincing arguement yay or nay, please PM me. I would like the official input (not that I can't guess) of those involved in the discussion before pulling the trigger.
__________________
"I have this theory that the Apollo missions were faked when NASA found out that general relativity was wrong because the Earth was expanding due to the Sun's iron core being influenced by magnetic waves from the electric universe after being perturbed by Planet X and thereby causing global warming. Where should I start a thread about this?" ~ ToSeek "Those are the people that wonder how a thermos knows whether to keep something hot or keep something cold." ~ NeoWatcher |
|
||||
|
Quote:
A secondary point was that no one but you seems to be able to judge what is or is not a valid synchonicity. What everyone here sees as totally meaningless coincidence, you seem to see as some sort of absolute proof. If no one can see it but you, then your system is not a design, but an intuition.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares. A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar. A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks. She might. You never know. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Important note: none of the following is meant to be even close to an ad hominem. It's all ad rem. I'm sure Dutch is a fine person who just has some unusual ideas. Therefore what follows is only a series of observations based on the material Dutch has posted here since, it seems, the beginning of time. OK. Excuse me for being blunt, Dutch, but, in the ATM section, you would be held accountable for your claims. If that's too much for you to handle, then that really puts your entire realm of speculations into the proper light, doesn't it? Not that most of us didn't already discern that. What a burden, not being able to explain in plain language, or better yet, with math and logic, the tenets of your hypothesis in thirty days or less... Not the entire hypothesis, just the tenets. ![]() Have you ever had to defend your thesis in front of a committee whose job is to shoot down any weakness in your dissertation? Based on what you've presented here, it seems unlikely. If you were in fact going for a post-graduate degree with the material you've presented in this thread and the complete lack of supporting, verifiable objective evidence, the school, if properly accredited, would probably be tempted to pull your baccalaureate. Out of curiosity, before this thread gets deservedly closed, what does your family (you have mentioned in numerous posts that you spend a lot of time with them, care for them, and look out for their welfare) think of your speculations? Just wondering if others share your "insights" or if (more likely) you're the only person who takes such stuff seriously. Meanwhile, a bit of career advice. Since you've said you do most of this "work" while on the job, watch out. If you get a new manager who's interested in productivity, you might be out there in the job market before you know it. One way or the other, I wish you luck. And I really hope you decide to learn something about the scientific method. PS: Note to the moderators: I realize some of this might have seemed to be harsh, but, I've found this thread to be something of an embarrassment re its being on a science board. I can see a newbie checking in, reading this thread, and thinking, Quote:
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|