spatial letter for JonClarke
Sorry for late, because my thread was in the PRISON of medorator. I could not open dwarf padlock during all month.
Your questions are about alphabet of geo evolution. Well, please read first law of cosmogeology
FIRST LAW OF COSMOGEOLOGY
(LAW OF GEOEVOLUTION)
- Every spacebody has four main phases of geoevolution.
1. Plasmatic stage. - The whole mass of body consists of red-hot gas, which becomes liquid little by little.
2. Liquid stage. – The whole mass of the body is in the liquid condition; only the inner nucleus of the heavy metals can be solid.
3. Mixed stage. – The body has formed the all nine geolayers.
4.Solid stage. – The All nine geolayers are in the solid condition and its geoevolution is over. Impossible EB geotransfer, volcano eruption and crustquake.
*
1. All spacebodies have own crust.
2. Crust of all spacebodies are formed by its own asthenosphere masses during cooling.
3. Volcano of all spacebodies are formed during tectonic activity. According NASA on the Moon tectonic activity was during 4~4.5 billions of years ago. NASA has evidences... (very many volcanic basalt of this age).
4. I wrote... (solid magma seas and ocean). This is natural chemical name of petrified asthenosphere seas and ocean. You never use... (solid water), ...use... (ice), ...use... (water vapor)...???
Because magma is very interesting chemical admixture of very many chemical elements, it has three aggregation state:
1. Plasmatic stage. - The whole mass of body consists of red-hot gas, which becomes liquid little by little... (red-hot gas is magma vopor)
2.Magma has liquid stage (into astenosphere and outer nucleus)
3. magma has solid stage. During huge outflow (-EB- geotransfer) event creates huge magma seas and oceans. After cooling its names are solid magma sea and solid magma ocean.
After eruption magma of course has partially liquid stage , but only temporarily stage... This is cosmogeological explanations (not geological).

Thanks,
Margiani

spatial letter for JonClarke -2
SECOND STRONG EVIDENCE
GEOEVOLUTION- geological evolution of the Earth geospheres
GEOTRANSFER-rapid movement of outer nucleus masses into asthenosphere
CRUSTBERG- chunk of the crust into liquid magma sea or ocean during huge outflow (-EB- geotransfer).

Second strong evidence is small crustberg. Movement crustbergs on the liquid surface of magma seas and oceans during events, is under influence of Archimedes' law as the icebergs movement on the our seas end oceans). Of course we can't see such unbelievable event, but we can see remains of crustbergs on the petrified magma sea and oceans. they are different size separately small hills and small high mountains on the wide platitude petrified magma sea and oceans. There are a lot of crustbergs into Imbrium basin of the Moon. We can see shadow of crustbergs on the wide platetude of Imbrium basin. (image here)
why crustbergs are strong evidence of cosmogeological theory. Because remains of crustbergs, (separately small hills and mountains) could not create tectonic activity (crustquakes, seduction zones, interaction of crust tiles) of the spacebody or asteroids impact. Separately small hills and mountains could create volcano eruption but crustberg does not has caldera to the pick...
There are a lot of crustbergs remains on the Mars, on the wide platitude of BLUE surface . BLUE surface is thin lithosphere platforms (floor of evaporated ancient seas and oceans on the Mars). Yellow surface is thick lithosphere platforms (Continental platforms). When spacebodies' surface consist with thick and thin lithosphere platforms this is evidence a lot of -EB- geotransfers (events). It has strong theoretical support (cosmogeological theory) and practical support (a lot of events on the Earth).
Thanks,
Margiani

... bright red is beautiful color but this word... event has smell of huge blood... I feel it...

As John Mendenhall wrote... Harry Turtledove in his book "Homeward Bound", has the Earthlings threaten the aliens with starships impacting their planets at c/2. Only a moment of reflection is required to realize what an awesome threat this would be.
To understand well... what is event, where are inner geoforces, you can see beautiful drawing (DRAWING here)
IMPORTANT EVIDENCE (DRAWING)
This is not only strong evidence, it is important and true evidence, and it means my theory... COSMOGEOLOGICAL THEORY is TRUTH.
P1 and P3 *are increscent forces of volume (There are XA and XD increscent cosmogeological geolayers) . All *P1. P2. P3. P4 forces are inner giant geoforces (pressure forces). Little by little... day by day... into outer nucleus is accumulating pressure during 65 million years (there are increasing P3 and P4 *forces). (DRAWING)
All asteroid impact could not create -EB- geotransfer(EVENT)
after event into E geosphere impact force of accumulated pressure is small.
AT THE END OF GEOEVOLUTION WHEN ALL GEOSPHERE HAS SOLID AGGREGATION STATE EVERY SPACEBODY HAS ABOUT 10 % ADDITIONAL VOLUME THAN DURING LIQUID STAGE.

Pressure forces at the AB boundary...P1.
Pressure forces at the BC boundary...P2.
Pressure forces at the DE boundary...P3.
Pressure forces at the EF boundary...P4.

P1 inner geoforces are tectonic forces. They are reason of crustquakes, subduction zones, volcano eruptions, interaction of crust tiles, mountains growth...
All spacebodies have or had similar geoevolution.
Thanks,
Margiani

I have just a single question:

In simple intelligible English, what exactly in the hell are you trying to say?

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If my question was in any way unclear, what I am asking for is a clear, concise summary or abstract of your ‘theory’. A few well structured sentences should easily suffice.

Thank you.

Now what evidence, such as core sample analysis, fossil records, carbon dating, etc. can you produce to support your hypothesis?

Cran's questions are still outstanding...

SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR CRAN

I removed "MAMMOTH CAVES " from my theory now... temporary !!! It needs my visit in the USA for evidences... Now this impassable... With this reason in view, now I'm unable to answer your questions... "MAMMOTH CAVES" as well as tectonics of the Earth is only particle of my modern cosmogeological theory. Many of them who reads this thread knows well your ordinary claim about my theory: ...smoky field...; ...mafic...; ... only as fiction, based on what you've presented so far ...(do'nt has future), etc.
You seriously doubt it ...
-But many others don't have any doubt...

I still don't understand it. Is that just me?

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

I'm looking for evidences everywhere, my work needs very many time, money, etc.
I'll publish periodically. I'm working...
Thanks,
Margiani

No.
Margiani

any body must call up seti

That's pretty much what I thought.

I would propose that this topic be closed or moved to Off Topic Babbling.

probably, but after a few beers it is much better!!

__________________
************************************************** *************************
Optimism does not change the laws of physics. (T'Pol)
A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is. (Dao De Jing 27)
************************************************** *************************
Martin ( http://www.geocities.com/DrMartinV )

Actually, I don't imbibe. More beers for you?

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

Re the last three posts, if you don't imbibe, crossing your eyes when you read this thread may help.

It is fun, though. I don't oppose a move to off topic. There we may be able to discuss the more frightening aspects of the Theory of Accumulating Gravity. At what point will the storage of old issues of National Geographic trigger gravitational collapse? Is this the route to a black hole?

On a more serious note, I'm going to go searching for planetary formation, and see what the mainstream ideas are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet#Formation

Try the Wikipedia article above, it has many more links within it. It's a wide open field.