spatial letter for JonClarke
Sorry for late, because my thread was in the PRISON of medorator. I could not open dwarf padlock during all month.
Your questions are about alphabet of geo evolution. Well, please read first law of cosmogeology
FIRST LAW OF COSMOGEOLOGY
(LAW OF GEOEVOLUTION)
- Every spacebody has four main phases of geoevolution.
1. Plasmatic stage. - The whole mass of body consists of red-hot gas, which becomes liquid little by little.
2. Liquid stage. – The whole mass of the body is in the liquid condition; only the inner nucleus of the heavy metals can be solid.
3. Mixed stage. – The body has formed the all nine geolayers.
4.Solid stage. – The All nine geolayers are in the solid condition and its geoevolution is over. Impossible EB geotransfer, volcano eruption and crustquake.
*
1. All spacebodies have own crust.
2. Crust of all spacebodies are formed by its own asthenosphere masses during cooling.
3. Volcano of all spacebodies are formed during tectonic activity. According NASA on the Moon tectonic activity was during 4~4.5 billions of years ago. NASA has evidences... (very many volcanic basalt of this age).
4. I wrote... (solid magma seas and ocean). This is natural chemical name of petrified asthenosphere seas and ocean. You never use... (solid water), ...use... (ice), ...use... (water vapor)...???
Because magma is very interesting chemical admixture of very many chemical elements, it has three aggregation state:
1. Plasmatic stage. - The whole mass of body consists of red-hot gas, which becomes liquid little by little... (red-hot gas is magma vopor)
2.Magma has liquid stage (into astenosphere and outer nucleus)
3. magma has solid stage. During huge outflow (-EB- geotransfer) event creates huge magma seas and oceans. After cooling its names are solid magma sea and solid magma ocean.
After eruption magma of course has partially liquid stage , but only temporarily stage... This is cosmogeological explanations (not geological).

Thanks,
Margiani

spatial letter for JonClarke -2
SECOND STRONG EVIDENCE
GEOEVOLUTION- geological evolution of the Earth geospheres
GEOTRANSFER-rapid movement of outer nucleus masses into asthenosphere
CRUSTBERG- chunk of the crust into liquid magma sea or ocean during huge outflow (-EB- geotransfer).

Second strong evidence is small crustberg. Movement crustbergs on the liquid surface of magma seas and oceans during events, is under influence of Archimedes' law as the icebergs movement on the our seas end oceans). Of course we can't see such unbelievable event, but we can see remains of crustbergs on the petrified magma sea and oceans. they are different size separately small hills and small high mountains on the wide platitude petrified magma sea and oceans. There are a lot of crustbergs into Imbrium basin of the Moon. We can see shadow of crustbergs on the wide platetude of Imbrium basin. (image here)
why crustbergs are strong evidence of cosmogeological theory. Because remains of crustbergs, (separately small hills and mountains) could not create tectonic activity (crustquakes, seduction zones, interaction of crust tiles) of the spacebody or asteroids impact. Separately small hills and mountains could create volcano eruption but crustberg does not has caldera to the pick...
There are a lot of crustbergs remains on the Mars, on the wide platitude of BLUE surface . BLUE surface is thin lithosphere platforms (floor of evaporated ancient seas and oceans on the Mars). Yellow surface is thick lithosphere platforms (Continental platforms). When spacebodies' surface consist with thick and thin lithosphere platforms this is evidence a lot of -EB- geotransfers (events). It has strong theoretical support (cosmogeological theory) and practical support (a lot of events on the Earth).
Thanks,
Margiani

... bright red is beautiful color but this word... event has smell of huge blood... I feel it...

As John Mendenhall wrote... Harry Turtledove in his book "Homeward Bound", has the Earthlings threaten the aliens with starships impacting their planets at c/2. Only a moment of reflection is required to realize what an awesome threat this would be.
To understand well... what is event, where are inner geoforces, you can see beautiful drawing (DRAWING here)
IMPORTANT EVIDENCE (DRAWING)
This is not only strong evidence, it is important and true evidence, and it means my theory... COSMOGEOLOGICAL THEORY is TRUTH.
P1 and P3 *are increscent forces of volume (There are XA and XD increscent cosmogeological geolayers) . All *P1. P2. P3. P4 forces are inner giant geoforces (pressure forces). Little by little... day by day... into outer nucleus is accumulating pressure during 65 million years (there are increasing P3 and P4 *forces). (DRAWING)
All asteroid impact could not create -EB- geotransfer(EVENT)
after event into E geosphere impact force of accumulated pressure is small.
AT THE END OF GEOEVOLUTION WHEN ALL GEOSPHERE HAS SOLID AGGREGATION STATE EVERY SPACEBODY HAS ABOUT 10 % ADDITIONAL VOLUME THAN DURING LIQUID STAGE.

Pressure forces at the AB boundary...P1.
Pressure forces at the BC boundary...P2.
Pressure forces at the DE boundary...P3.
Pressure forces at the EF boundary...P4.

P1 inner geoforces are tectonic forces. They are reason of crustquakes, subduction zones, volcano eruptions, interaction of crust tiles, mountains growth...
All spacebodies have or had similar geoevolution.
Thanks,
Margiani

I have just a single question:

In simple intelligible English, what exactly in the hell are you trying to say?

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If my question was in any way unclear, what I am asking for is a clear, concise summary or abstract of your ‘theory’. A few well structured sentences should easily suffice.

Thank you.

Now what evidence, such as core sample analysis, fossil records, carbon dating, etc. can you produce to support your hypothesis?

Cran's questions are still outstanding...

__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov

SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR CRAN

I removed "MAMMOTH CAVES " from my theory now... temporary !!! It needs my visit in the USA for evidences... Now this impassable... With this reason in view, now I'm unable to answer your questions... "MAMMOTH CAVES" as well as tectonics of the Earth is only particle of my modern cosmogeological theory. Many of them who reads this thread knows well your ordinary claim about my theory: ...smoky field...; ...mafic...; ... only as fiction, based on what you've presented so far ...(do'nt has future), etc.
You seriously doubt it ...
-But many others don't have any doubt...

I still don't understand it. Is that just me?

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

I'm looking for evidences everywhere, my work needs very many time, money, etc.
I'll publish periodically. I'm working...
Thanks,
Margiani

No.
Margiani

any body must call up seti

That's pretty much what I thought.

I would propose that this topic be closed or moved to Off Topic Babbling.

probably, but after a few beers it is much better!!

__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)

Actually, I don't imbibe. More beers for you?

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

Re the last three posts, if you don't imbibe, crossing your eyes when you read this thread may help.

It is fun, though. I don't oppose a move to off topic. There we may be able to discuss the more frightening aspects of the Theory of Accumulating Gravity. At what point will the storage of old issues of National Geographic trigger gravitational collapse? Is this the route to a black hole?

On a more serious note, I'm going to go searching for planetary formation, and see what the mainstream ideas are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet#Formation

Try the Wikipedia article above, it has many more links within it. It's a wide open field.

I'm not sure that this response counts as answers to the outstanding questions ... but at least it's drawn your admission that your ideas regarding the Mammoth Caves were made without evidence ...

"thank you!.. By... forever!.." is that how you intend to react to any serious challenge? Then I do feel sorry for you ...


Yes it is ... and one I find very interesting ...

__________________

SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR JOHN MENDENHALL

Thank you John I did not know about this information of wikipedia still. interstellar planetary mass object has in my theory another name and described in the topic 11. interstellar planetary mass objects' has grate support by my theory. Now I don't want discuss about...

I have found very many evidences for my theory in the solar system. I'll publish periodically...

According wikipedia...An interstellar planetary mass object is an object which has equivalent mass to a planet and is not gravitationally bound to any star, and that therefore moves through space as an independent object. Several astronomers claim to have detected such objects, but those detections remain unconfirmed.[1]

It means I'm on the right way...

P.S. ...for PUB men... I'll send you in the ignore list if you try again...

Which force could create *Vallesmarineris? when crust is thin at the beginning stage of geoevolution asteroid impact could create one huge rim and huge magma basin inside. Asteroid impact on the thick crust could create huge deep crater and few huge rims around...???
Because Mars is spacebody second law of cosmogeology is law for Mars too. There are deleted a lot of tracks of events on the Mars by atmosphere dust circulation, but huge track of one of the last event was left (Vallesmarineris). In the centre of Vallesmarineris is huge arc-crack pouring with liquid magma (now petrified). -EB- geotransfer could split huge continental platforms, because that is rule of -EB- geotransfer, but it never could form such huge destructions into the central places of Vallesmarineris between thick lithosphere platforms. -EB- geotransfer could easily destroy thin lithosphere tiles. Centre of Vallesmarineris has only one explanation... (ASTEROID IMPACT + EB-GEOTRANSFER).* Detail explanation of this event you never find in the Geology or in the Astronomy. This huge geological force of the Mars still unknown for mankind and geologists too, but geoforces into spacebodies are same. Huge masses, part of destroyed crust in the centre was deleted (destroyed, submerged and melted) by huge outflows from asthenosphere. There were formed a lot of small crustbergs as the evidences of -EB- geotransfer. Magma could not fill Vallesmarineris and could not create huge mountains chains around because east direction was fully opened. Huge outflow and wild streams could destroy not only raptured centre of Vallesmarineris, there was destroyed east side too. In this case, asteroid impact was detonator of -EB- geotransfer (EVENT) because impossible another explanation of huge crust masses disappearance.
Vallesmarineris, this huge crack was formed by increscent forces of coarse. After -EB- geotransfer diameter of the Mars was increased. There was increased surface area of the Mars too and because there were formed many huge cracks on the surface by this event time and Vallesmarineris too.
absence of wide huge destroyed crust masses into centre of Vallesmarineris (across of huge crack) proves that, split of huge continental crust platforms was rapidly. Disappearance of huge destroyed wide costal crusts-masses proves that, After event they were submerged and melted into red-hot asthenosphere ocean of the Mars. Evaporating of this huge crust masses was imposable. because before Evaporating solid chemical admixtures had a liquid stage. There are very many partially melted crust lines, remains of crustbergs on the surface of Vallesmarineris... Everything proves that, destroyed crust geolayers by asteroid impact were melted into temporary opened asthenosphere of the Mars. Mountains chains formation was imposable near to this huge split-area. Mountains chains were not formed during rapidly split, of our Africa-American platforms, to the costs of Atlantic ocean. There are not same all split-lines accros of modern Africa-American platforms. There were submerged and melted part of costal crust-masses, (small part of destroyed costal zones) into red-hot ocean of asthenosphere. Everything proves... there were rapidly split of the platforms 65 million years ago with destroyed small part of costal split-zones.
Why was melted destroyed huge crust masses. Because There was increasing temperature into B geosphere During -EB-geotransfer. Of course temperature into outer nucleus is too much, then into asthenosphere. Now we can explain about partially melted crust lines into Vallesmarineris, and about disappearance huge central crust masses almost equally of our Australia. -EB- geotransfer can explain everything...
IT MEANS COSMODEOLOGYCAL THEORY IS TRUE!!!
1. Same increscent forces.
2. Same -EB- geotransfers.
3. Same Huge outflow from own asthenosphere of spacebodies.
4. Same asteroids impacts as the detonator of -EB- geotransfers; on the Mars, Moon, Earth...
5. Same formation magma seas and oceans (of course now petrified)
6. Same formation of small crustbergs on the magma seas and oceans.
7. Same disappearance of destroyed and melted crust costal masses (especially of burst parts).

Before you're banned for failing to answer direct questions, I should point out that I don't think you've shown a first strong evidence. Now, this may be because your English isn't terribly good. However, I also think you've missed my sarcasm when I claimed to be convinced because of your use of large type, captial letters, and bright colours. I was kidding; in fact, what convinces me is strong arguments.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

Since the origin of Valles Marineris has nothing to do with impacts obviously this third "strong" evidence doesn't get past go.

However at least the "raptured centre of Vallesmarineris" indicates that it was having a good time.....

Jon

You've just won a permanent banning. The first rule of BAUT is be nice.

__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein