Zetasquawk has a new page up, of the 'debating points' for the big NancyVsPhil Heavyweight Champeenship of the Galaxy debate tonite.

See It Here!

My position is, there are Nancy's explanations and then there are scientifically verifiable explanations for the situations noted on that page. Seeing as how quite a few of them are beyond my range of experience, would anyone care to help educate me and show me where the holes are in the logic here? Other than the holes in the head of a certain unnamed Wisconsin resident, that is...

Seriously - these are most likely the points that Nancy is going to try to use tonight. What will shoot each of them down in roaring technicolored flames?

__________________
"If a tree is cut down in the rainforest, and is used to make paper to print a book, and the book is really bad, and there's nobody that will read it, do you still hear a sucking sound?"
Charlie in Dayton, A.AsC.

It's down/gone. Can you snag any of that from your cache?

Keep refreshing and you should get it eventually. I did.