Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-January-2007, 09:25 PM
kmarinas86's Avatar
kmarinas86 kmarinas86 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 232
Send a message via AIM to kmarinas86
Exclamation Science vs. Psuedoscience (drawing the line)

SCIENCE

a - independently measured variable
b - independently measured variable
c - independently measured variable

Functions of a scientific theory
a(a,b) - theorized function
b(a,c) - theorized function
c(a,b) - theorized function

Scientific discoveries:
All variables: a, b, and c.
All functions: a(b,c), b(a,c), and c(a,b).

x - independently measured variable
y - independently measured variable
z - independently measured variable
r - calculated variable

Functions of a scientific theory
r(x,y) - theorized function
z(r(x,y)) - theorized function

Scientific discoveries:
Most variables: x, y, and z.
One function: z(r(x,y)).

Conclusion:
The scientific theory can help us predict the value of an independently measurable variable as long as we know the value of other variable(s).

PSEUDOSCIENCE

a - independently measured variable
b - independently measured variable
c - calculated variable

Functions of a pseudoscientific "theory"
c(a,b) - theorized function
b(a,c) - theorized function
a(b,c) - theorized function

Scientific discoveries:
The variables a and b.

Conclusion:
The pseudoscientific theory was not needed.

APPLICIATION IN COSMOLOGY:
Independently measurable
- spectrum
- spectral pattern
- redshift
- photon count
- exposure length
- angle between approaching photons at surface of imaging
- angular width of an image
- angular change of position in the sky
Calculated
- angular width of the object which was imaged
- brightness of an object at its surface
- comoving distance
- light travel time distance
- luminosity distance
- angular diameter distance
- radius of a galaxy
- radius of the universe
- age of a photon from the Cosmic Background Radiation
- age of the universe
- mass of a galaxy
- mass of a cluster of galaxies
- 4D velocity of a galaxy

RULE OF SCIENCE: Each of your calculated variables must be used to predict variables outside its definition. For example r may be derived from x and y, which then may be used to calculate z, which can be formulated in terms of x and y alone. Discontinue use of those calculated variables which do not serve any purpose in determining independently measurable variables outside its definition. A theory whose aim is to show these calculated variables to be the case cannot be a scientific theory. Calculated variables must serve simply as tools of math to get from one set of independently measurable variable(s) to another - in correspondence with observations.
__________________
cause of event ≠ explanation
My Cyclical Multiverse Hypothesis
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2007, 04:07 AM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,116
Default

I would like to see where inflation, Dark Energy, and Dark Energy sit in your dependent/independent variable chart
__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-January-2007, 06:34 PM
kmarinas86's Avatar
kmarinas86 kmarinas86 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 232
Send a message via AIM to kmarinas86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
I would like to see where inflation, Dark Energy, and Dark Energy sit in your dependent/independent variable chart
They are calculated variables for sure - especially if we infer their past existence. However, the distinction between independent and dependent variables is different than the distinction between independently measured variables and calculated variables.

Calculated variables may serve merely as interim variables in science (like G, c, h, etc.). But what is more important for science is that a set of independently measured variables can be used to predict another set of independently measured variable(s).
__________________
cause of event ≠ explanation
My Cyclical Multiverse Hypothesis
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-January-2007, 12:30 AM
SMEaton's Avatar
SMEaton SMEaton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 326
Default

I smell an agenda... kinda garlicky, isn't it? Maybe that's just my kitchen. Just say what you want to say.
__________________
pax et veritas
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-January-2007, 04:45 PM
Bogie's Avatar
Bogie Bogie is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMEaton View Post
I smell an agenda... kinda garlicky, isn't it? Maybe that's just my kitchen. Just say what you want to say.
I am just a dunce, but I can only hope that it is an agenda that promotes observations and quantification of observations that can serve as a kind of data base for supporting qualitative ideas and implications. This is in place of purely quantitative data that is not supported by observations but is being used as if the math was equal to observational evidence.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Science Publishes 100% Fabricated Consensus om@umr.edu Astronomy 12 19-December-2004 06:39 AM
doc. film on radical science needs subjects shugh Against the Mainstream 14 05-February-2004 03:48 PM
Errata items mik sawicki Bad Astronomy: The Books 9 24-September-2003 12:12 PM
Bad news in Georgia? David Hall Against the Mainstream 111 03-September-2002 08:01 PM
Good Science versus Bad Science samsara15 Against the Mainstream 15 07-August-2002 09:54 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today