My theory of the creation of the universe. - Page 4

rebel · #91 (**permalink**) 21-May-2007, 03:47 AM

Tobin Dax,

Quote:

Your units still don't work (just as they haven't with any equation you've posted so far), so you equation isn't correct. An expansion rate is a velocity and a creation rate has units of 1/time, so you are still missing a unit of distance (m/s * 1/s = m/s2, not m2/s2). Please explain how the square of the speed of light it equal to a velocity times a rate when the units don't add up.

Yes, Rc=m/T (rate of creation is equal to motion divided by time).

T=m/Rc, m=T*Rc,

"The velocity of an object is its speed in a particular direction. Velocity can also be defined as rate of change of displacement or just as the rate of displacement" or V=s/T as quoted from the Wikipedia.

THANK YOU, for paying attention, you've helped me find my mathematical error.

Quote:

equations of mathematical proof.

Fe=Ce(Rc*Ep)

Ep=(Fe/Ce)/Rc

Ce=(Fe/Rc)*Ep

Rc*Ep=Fe/Ce

Rc=(Fe/Ce)/Ep

abbreviations stand for:

Fe= the number of electrons, "free energy"

Ce= the weight of mass or the nuclei, "condensed energy"

Rc= the rate the electrons are created, "rate of creation"

Ep= the measured amount of force caused by the expansion of electrons, "energy pressure".

from post #66 is incorrect. Please realize that Rc=Fe/(Ce*Ee) and Ee=Fe/(Ce*Rc).

Nereid · #92 (**permalink**) 21-May-2007, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nereid

Quote:

Originally Posted by rebel

Nereid,

The only inconsistencies between Newton's understanding of gravity and mine is the definition of gravity, the facts are still the same.

If by "facts" you mean well-established observational and experimental results, may one conclude, from your statement, that your idea has been shown to be inconsistent with the way the universe 'works' by the millions of observations that are consistent with the theory of General Relativity (GR), but inconsistent with "Newton's understanding of gravity"?

More directly, that your idea cannot account for things like gravitational lensing, the Shapiro time delay, gravitational redshift, and the 'advance' of the perihelion of Mercury?

Bumping this post, as the question in it doesn't seem to have been answered.

Perhaps my question was unclear; let me expand it into several separate questions.

1) rebel, please show - quantitatively - how your idea is consistent with gravitational lensing.

2) Please show - quantitatively - how your idea accounts for the movement of the perihelion of Mercury.

3) Please show - quantitatively - the consistency between your idea and the observations of the Shapiro time delay.

Tobin Dax · #93 (**permalink**) 21-May-2007, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rebel

Tobin Dax,

Yes, Rc=m/T (rate of creation is equal to motion divided by time).

T=m/Rc, m=T*Rc,

"The velocity of an object is its speed in a particular direction. Velocity can also be defined as rate of change of displacement or just as the rate of displacement" or V=s/T as quoted from the Wikipedia.

THANK YOU, for paying attention, you've helped me find my mathematical error.

It's still in error. Define "motion" (m) and give the units for the quantity. (If it is unitless, please explain why.)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The Cosmic	alkawn.net	Astronomy	2	01-July-2006 07:56 PM
The Universe A, C, B	RussT	Against the Mainstream	10	05-March-2006 03:45 PM
Do we need a theory of the universe at this point?	Ari Jokimaki	Against the Mainstream	78	06-May-2005 05:32 PM
Androids and Unified Theory.	Synchro	Against the Mainstream	2	09-October-2004 04:49 AM