Bumping this posttruedream, it seems that you may have overlooked my questions.

Could you please answer them.

The gravitational force is proportional to mass, yes but let us see in Better view.

Better view is the gravitational force is proportional to mass of nucleus.
I say is nucleus of all atoms having new type of magnetic force, that is magnetic property of Nucleus and I call it as atomic magnetic force.

Better view is the gravitational force is directly proportional to magnetic property of nucleus.


Like wise magnetic force is proportional to the magnetic moment.

Better view is present magnetic force is proportional to the mass of electron

Better view is present magnetic force is directly proportional to the mass of anti electron.

Better view is present magnetic force is directly proportional to the magnetic property of anti electron.


So gravity is directly proportional to magnetic property of nucleus (atomic magnetic force).this atomic magnetic force is something different from present magnetic force.

First we don’t have peer-reviewed publications process for basic science and basic laws, because we have passed that age of it 100 or 200 years before.
Now we are in advance level with many branches of science and peer-review process.

"As long as the laws of the mathematics refer to the reality, they are not exact;and while they are exact, they don't refer to the reality.
Imagination is more important than knowledge."

Albert Einstein

Can you provide an example with numbers?

All present basic laws of atom are found with respect to earth.
Most of us are inside small circle.

What is the true law of atom with respect to the space?

Did you think we have discovered all the atoms?
Ok you need to know which is solid atom and which is gas atom.

Sun core is made up of prefect gas atom and like wise earth solid core is made of prefect solid atom. Ok earth solid core is made of which atom?? Only we can imagine or guess because it is not possible to discover by science.

Can you change this solid core atom into gas state??? You can do noting
with temperature and pressure.

Like wise let us imagine hydrogen atom is prefect gas atom.
Can you change this gas atom into solid state???

As I sad before, Let us separate Earth into tree main parts, solid core, liquid core and atmosphere. With respect earth: solid core is made up of high gravity atom, liquid core is made up of semi gravity atom and atmosphere is made up of anti gravity atoms.
Till now we have seen maximum of semi gravity atom.

First, you didn't answer my question; please do so.

Second, the view in the part of your post that I am quoting here is itself very much an ATM view of the nature of science, in the 21st century.

Unfortunately, BAUT's scope is astronomy and space, so a detailed exposition, together with challenges etc, is beyond the scope of this board. However, if you wish to defend these ATM ideas, re the nature of science, please say so (and I, for one, will ask direct, pertinent questions on those ATM ideas, as you present them).Other than in the posts in this thread, together with any links to other webpages in those posts, where is the speculative ATM idea that is the topic of this thread explained? In your answer, please focus on freely available sources.

my theory is 100% scientific theory of nature, even I am ready give some references papers for relevant peer-reviewed publications.

Please guide me.

I think my presentation will be bad because English is my second language

Do you have any proof of any of this? And don't refer us to those links in the other forum, it is just more of the same discussion here. What actual physical data do you have of any of this?

As far as "you can do nothing with temperature and pressure"... really?! I have spent the last 25 years of my career as a solid state chemist doing lots of stuff with temperature and pressure, including changing things from solids to liquids to gas, and back again, and creating synthetic versions of minerals found in the Earth, such as quartz and fluorite.

"Imagination is more important than knowledge" is a great quote. But imagination isn't the end of it. Einstein was very imaginative, but all of his theories were actually proven by actual physical measurements. They explain the physical state of the universe better than other theories. Please supply such physical evidence of your theories.

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple

Heck, you can change the state of matter from liquid to solid in your own freezer.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

A 'theory', as in a 'scientific theory', in today's world, is one that has been written up in one or more papers which have been published in relevant peer-reviewed journals.

In which relevant, peer-reviewed journals has your 'theory' been published?

Note that as the second sentence of the opening post (OP) of this thread is "These are some of comments about my theory" (my bold), at least one of these published papers will need to have you as at least one of the authors.

If you have not published any such papers, please say so.

And from liquid to gas on the cooker.

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)

let us imagine hydrogen atom is prefect gas atom.
Can you change this perfect gas atom into prefect solid state???

So no one have any valid point against my theory
I am taking about atoms which was not discovered by science

Yes I have not published any such papers in relevant peer-reviewed journals, but I have created my own web site with some basic papers of my theory five months before (name of my own web site is www.truesci.com) and I have released some of basic theory in toequest forum as article.

That all I have done

Sure we can. What is the definition of a perfect state of matter (gas, liquid, or solid)? We can't answer your question without know how you define that.

Let's have some definitions. Clearly what you are referring to as a "gas" or "solid" is not what everyone else calls a gas or solid. First of all, there is no such thing as a "solid" atom. The term "solid" only applies to a large collection of atoms and the way they behave together.

You only ask questions but you don’t answer for my questions or understand my Question.

My question is, let us imagine hydrogen atom is prefect gas atom.
Can you change this perfect gas atom into prefect solid state???
Then which is prefect solid atom,as i sad before atom present at solid core are prefect solid atom.
Can you change hydrogen atom into perfect solid atom??

That is can you add or mix hydrogen atom with our solid core of earth with help of temperature and pressure?????????

Ok what proof do you want? I think you don’t understand my theory
Gravity is proof for my theory and motions of planets in our solar system is
physical evidence for my theory.
By my theory I am saying our planet itself a complete magnetic planet and maximum magnetic property is proportional to the core. Then our planet is locked by magnetic field of sun. Yes even sun is a complete magnet and motions of all planets in our solar system are result of this magnetic property.
Note: don’t make fun by asking about geo magnetism because I am speaking about new magnetic force.

If you are against my theory, then you should explain me what is gravity? What is the link in-between gravity and atom? What is the endless force which creates motions in all planets in our solar system? What is the source for mechanical spin in atom? What type of force is it? What is this end less force in atom?

Because my theory can answer for these questions

Heck, you can change from solid to gas on the stove, if you start with ice cubes.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

It has already pointed out that "gas", "liquid" and "solid" have specific meanings in physics. You are obviously not using those terms with these meanings.

So, how about providing here a concise definition of "gas", "liquid" and "solid" within your theory, so that the people here can understand what you mean?

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)

Of course.

And if you use dry ice, it does not even have to go through liquid to do that.

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)

Paramagnetism, ferromagnetism and diamagnetism.
Look up chapters 34 to 37 in Feynman's Lectures on Physics, Vol. 2.


Have a look at chapter 8 in Eisberg & Resnick's Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles.

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)

The BAUT board has a Questions & Answers forum for such questions.


I think you have not completely read mainstream textbooks.


So, all those probes we sent throughout the Solar System and all that spectroscopy astronomers and astrophysicists do, do not count, right?

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)

you people are crazy think about what you are saying before you say it

ok what is gravity and how does it effect us thats the first question then we ask what is antigravity then we can think about science in other words you can babble on about gravity etc. but whats your point

May I suggest that you try to phrase your comments in a more polite way, Garykpo? We do have a "be nice" rule around here.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

truely an interesting site, this toequest!!

I divide atoms into two different family, one is gas family other is solid
family. The difference is based upon there magnetic property. Yes two
solid and gas atom has opposite magnetic property like couples .
For eg imagine: gas atom is female atom and solid atom is male atom.

Sun core is made up of prefect gas atom and like wise
Earth solid core is made of prefect solid atom.

Let us imagine hydrogen atom is prefect gas atom.
Can you change this perfect gas atom into prefect solid atom???
Then which is prefect solid atom, atom present at solid core.
Can you change hydrogen atom into perfect solid atom??

That is can you add or mix hydrogen atom with our solid core of earth?
If you add then you can see the effect of anti gravity of hydrogen.

But when we add or mix hydrogen atom with core of sun, then you can see
the effect of gravity of hydrogen

Bolding mine.

It is not up to me to answer your questions, it is up to you to answer mine. You should look at the rules of this board and in particular the rules for the ATM section.

Ok, I imagine it. A perfect gas atom can't be changed into a solid. Well, we can create solid hydrogen (see the 2 links below - and that was from 1 minute of googling), therefore your theory is wrong, either hydrogen isn't a perfect gas or perfect gases can be changed to solids.
Solid hydrogen link 1
Solid hydrogen link 2

Now, I suspect you will claim it is not a "perfect solid". But until you define a perfect gas and a perfect solid, we don't know what those terms mean.

You keep saying the same thing - that you divide atoms up into two classes based on their magnetic properties and that the Sun's core is made of one class and the Earth's another. Show us how that theory explains some observable fact better than current theories. Tell us for all the elements in the periodic table which atoms are in which class.

I could say imagine that atoms are all "Cat" atoms and "Dog" atoms, based on how long their tails are. But until I even show atoms have tails, and how that explains things better, it is meaningless.

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple

May I point out that Gillianren is correct, this is against the rules, but I am a tolerant person, so I will not get upset about it.

I will only ask you to explain why you say this, and what information do you have to back it up.

But; aside from the personal attack, I am offended that you are spelling America without being capitalized.

The spelling errors in your profile make it hard to take you seriously to begin with.

__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)

He talks about gravity not being about mass, but rather nucleac size. Interestingly enough, 99.99% of all atomic mass is in the nucleus. Compared to protons and neutrons, the mass of electrons are "negligible".

#EDIT: Sorry to backtrack, just got here

truedream, why do you keep copying and pasting from your own posts?

The "broken-record" method is not an valid alternative to explaining your claims.

__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

"...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation)