I read the whole free sample of the book and find it rather intruigiung to find out why I had so much problem in understanding qualitatively rather than quantitatively about the physic world I've been studying all this while.

I'm new here, hence I feel more anxious to let out many of my theories.

As the book "The Final Theory" by Mark McCutcheon states clearly and rather quite repeatedly is that our world of physics as we see it now is flawed. Our standard theories, laws and models are misconceptions of the true theory which ,as he puts it, so far eluded us.

And after reading through his book's discussion, I discovered that his final theory was that all matter are actually expanding which leads to the seemingly gravitational pull.
Unfortunately, just like how the author states that Newton's Law of universal gravitation violates law of conservation of energy, the same can be said on his own theory.

Here's my own personal theory. It's just a thought, not a fully proof or concrete theory that a full blown debate should arise from.

~The Everon sub-atomic particle~

Since this sub-atomic particle praticly encompasses all theories to date, it should simply be named the Everything sub-atom or Everon.

First I would like to point out that I jsut making a blind rush.

To understand how the everon gains its own power source, we must first consider enthalpy.

Almost every chemical reaction to date releases heat energy. Heat is practically everywhere in the universe or to put it better, protons ( Force carrier particles ).

What the everon does is consume protons and project a new force, Gravity. With every proton it consumes, it produces attraction known today as gravity.

The everon orbits around all charge particles and comes in 2 types. Proton orbiting everons (Proveron) and Electron orbiting everons (Electroveron). They are so miniscule and travel at speeds so fast that it has evaded us jsut like how gluons and its colour charges did.

When everons orbit a certain particle, it becomes charged.

When everons convert proton/heat to gravity/attraction is causes an orbit like pull towards the now charged particle.

I have no clue whether everons were either created and mantained stability through out infinite time of is able to jump to other sub-atomicparticles.

As matter become larger, more atoms are included, more everons are able to convert protons (heat) into gravity.

But, everons reaction towards each other very amazingly. The projection of gravity between Proveron and Electroveron causes attraction and the projection of equal charge orbiting everons causes repulsion. It could be that both of the everon types produce possibly different amounts of gravity/attraction.

When 2 or more everons orbit a single charge sub-atomic particle, the repulsion and attraction becomes more apparent. Magnets contain the most everons orbiting a single charged particle. Apparently, the effect of attraction increases from more everons towards lesser everons.

This causes magnets to pull metal mroe effectively than others.

Unfortunately, my theory does not disturb or try to flaw quantum physics because this theory readily accepts photons as photons.

Drastic energy changes causes unstable projection of gravity in the form of electromagnetic radiation.

I noe this theory is full of crap but hey, its against the mainstream and I think, and hope it does not violate any laws...

more crappy theories coming up! Next one ~ How the Big Bang occured - its rather a mroe religious sort of theory...

So you have a number of disarticulated speculative ideas that do not form a cohesive set of postulates that you are not prepared to defend? That’s not even close to being a “theory”. If this is an example of your scientific methodology, please spare us your second theological based installment. You are aware that this is a forum for science and astronomy?

I have closed this thread. It appears to be yet another advertisement for the above mentioned book.

__________________
Forming opinions as we speak