|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Time …..
"The surprises keep coming," says physicist David Albert of Columbia University. None is greater than finding loopholes in the hallowed uncertainty principle—and, even more outlandishly, seeing hints that the future may leak into the present or They have to accept that subatomic systems can become so "entangled" that measuring one affects the other even if the two are light-years apart, which Einstein called "spooky action at a distance." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19875410/site/newsweek/ Trying to stay with the times …. Using news articles to be accepted by them piers or is it peers … This is also recognized in the Wheeler experiment when addressing the parameters correctly. |
|
|||
|
Finding that the Wheeler Exp is like many and the parameters are what the various scientists are trying to perfect. And then Bohr is returned to that the detector is quite important itself …. Or my words would be ‘no interaction, no thing’ … or wave going through space …. Maybe you will get that later but the key in this is not so much Wheeler but Nicolas Gisin ….. take a few and see it is his work stirring up so much.
http://arxiv.org/find/quant-ph/1/au:.../0/1/0/all/0/1 Index search http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/p.../0610241v1.pdf http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/p.../0702130v2.pdf Detection loophole in asymmetric Bell experiments http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0704/0704.0758.pdf Entangling Independent Photons by Time Measurement http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...706.1924v1.pdf Long-Distance Entanglement Distribution with Single-Photon Sources Look at how a split energy (hv) by 2 sources can in fact affect the others pair by synchronizing the time exchange rather than a wave phasing of each pair. This offers a method of seeing that time and exchanges between the filters contradicts a hv/t, hence the interference is the entanglement and time rather than the wave/space itself. A ‘c’ buster if I ever saw one. May even appear FTL and freaky to our senses. But what this guy does is work on the methods and devices that many other scientists are using to test their work, the key again is within his developments he is tapping on how it works and planck gets in the way. By describing the photon at a period in time recognized by the click or set ‘memory,’ then the tendency or probability is set ‘structurally’, by filtering a set hv, by the crystal, the aligning of the period which is entangled to the initial energy but the increased (amplitude) or time magnification is a structural/energy frame shifting hence that observed angular momentum but not a particle movement but a period depending on the distance, hence the scales and the difference which based on the wavelength the inverse square rule (gravity) applies. What to see is a radius to the amplitude/time in relation to the entangled energy between the observation points. The math is right there but are you ready just yet? Keep this and remember; ‘back when.’ What this is for is to share that ‘time’ is the issue rather than mass or some aether phenomena. Point particles do not exist! Rather if any want to see a real black hole then all mass basically is a black hole between nodes. Consider a frequency as that scale to energy in relation to time versus distance. Distance only comes into play with interactions. And then time can be seen/described as affected and entanglement shares this when the rendition of energy is corrected. Back to doing what I do best, covering real material and reinforcing bridges. ‘They’ can wait for the news articles to comprehend since ‘the community’ is so smart but at least the few following can know where these new bridges are originating. |
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
In other words a chemical description of a metabolic process, may share that by putting water and dirt together you have mud but what are the actual exchanges at the molecular scale will never be known. There is no method to cover the actual exchange of the energy in wavelengths versus heat in a chemical model. In the frame shared, a physical comprehension of how life exists, exactly why in a scientific frame with no phenomena offers the mind a conclusion sought by every sole since the beginning of time. The same frame reveals how that physical sense of good and bad exists, including exactly how each is actually responsible for their continued existence; after life. All within a physical framework based on energy and the properties of the so called ‘uncertain’ phenomena. There is only one physical way it works and what is within this marries up all branches of the sciences quite literally. Again there is no phenomena. If you haven’t noticed, that NO PHENOMENA is what Understanding addresses. There is not such thing and every phenomenon has a physical cause and it is our current sciences that continue to perpetuate this junk and not real sciences. It is why the metaphysical beliefs of an after life still exists in the first place and here on this site, all they want is to perpetuate this same focus, and are selling it with heat. So share an unknown phenomena and let’s walk it through, if the model presented can not directly address it then we have work to do. Pick anything you like Quote:
Quote:
The key here is in recognizing that anything done has responsibilities to the total. Quote:
That whale, as far off the coast and as deep as he/she dives, is actually being affected with or without a comprehensive knowledge to each individual, but the scope of affects are entangled to all other things and just to perpetuate the ‘good’ in support and duty, the rolling affect will become a life within the total, all the way to our beloved Blue Whale. Now in the east, they claim ‘masters’ can assume the physical such as to change into the critter itself. I haven’t seen this nor have I seen someone ‘walking through a wall.’ MY point is to become a ‘good’ part of the existence in total, the life is entangled to all other within the total and not as an isolated part; cancer. To consciously become a part of anything or assume a characterization can be imaginative, but to physically change into another ‘organism’ does not make sense in the literal view. By choice we can contribute our energy to support, to change, to impose or even to imagine as each does in fact affect everything else. For example; just to dream about a big dog biting you, in the morning if a dog barks too close, you will be affected in your reaction; you now ‘stepped left’ based on a conception. Quote:
Ever wonder about the euphoria a lead guitarist has? He is experiencing the many who are not only listening but recognizes the many playing ‘air guitar’ to his contribution. The interactions can be quite deep. Not to mention Love in itself as these interactions have enormous affects; nations have crumbled over a single Love. Some times I see gravity as simply a sense of reaction to any change. It is easy to see ‘energy’ in itself is that observed cause of any gravitational affects. To utilize gravity in a mechanical form is rather easy but some of the ‘newly recognized systems’ need another day as these types of items and weaponry are items I do not like to talk to about. Some items offer mechanisms that I will not discuss for example I was playing with nuclear physics as a kid. If everyone actually knew how easy a weapon is to build we would be in big trouble. Quote:
Every single sense we capture is in the forum of a reception, of various conversion, of energy and every single one can be reduced to a source of emr. This one line is esoteric and often gets hammered but bring’em on …. And if you bring each item whether sight, sound, aromatic or pressures, all have what as the force or cause? EMR in one wavelength or a bunch, in every case. These are the ‘stupid easy’ parts I just can’t understand why the ‘community’ just doesn’t see. Quote:
One guy here wanted to have sex with robots or basically that unless he can imagine his shoes being tied and a robot comes and ties them for him by his mental exchange of ‘that is what I want’ … they will never be happy. Soon the next desire will be BJ’s in various textures. These are from selfish needs, something to sell and being promoted as something every household should have in our modern society but with these selfish needs there are costs and the last in line within this ‘loss to the common’ is the environment. We as a species are the only thing building damn’s and skyscrapers with complete disregard to the environment, sold as a good thing but in most every case the rolling affect is a negative within the total. That building did not make life better it made a person rich. That damn did not help society it made it easier in the eyes of man, but decimates whole ecosystems. And all of us are a part of this total. We do not have a right to this period, we are a part of it and our duty is to learn how to be a part, share this knowledge and give our life a chance to ‘support life to continue’ or we effectively kill ourselves by becoming a ‘cancer’ or physically a ‘loss to the common,’ based on these isolating pursuits. At this point; to begin a pursuit within the framework being suggested, the medical field will finally be a comprehensible field as they describe and understand how to address many ailments in an exponential scale. Within the gifts of knowledge and especially the medical field all colors of the species will listen. The differences should only be of opinion when the sciences can be perfected bringing facts and truth to the front and when truth is recognized to be physically functioning, then to comprehend how this ‘physical’ is also what vindicates the metaphysical, then all colors and all races can be unified in one species equally known as man. To understand the basics makes it easy and every single line mentioned is based on a simple set of rules vindicating the philosophical renditions, tying in the scientific renditions and purely fulfilling the theological renditions. That One Aristilian approach to existence. The Tao! |
|
|||
|
Are there enough predictions in this thread or do we need to add a few more?
How about we hammer on chemistry a little and show that interactions of structures have a path opposing the simple entropic models? It's 'about time,' someone took on the globe in a scientific frame. Can't shake facts! Don't care much about the theological renditions as the hobby only shared what it all means. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
When one group is fevorishly supporting relativity and the use of Virial to comprehend and predict, the fact remains it is at the core of energy and the description herein that are the reason for the errors. Time is that 'aether' between the nodes of H and the imposition to the period, is mass. ![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Look all over the globe, changes are occuring in the sciences and only within the sciences will the globe have to ability to comprehend and allow peace to reign. Many layers will be crumbling in the near future. War is coming! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Either we have light in Newton's rings as certainties or Einstein as nice a gentleman as he was, was not necessarily speaking infallibly. The thing about absolutes is that they are not:- case in point An irresistible force meets an immovable object. Outcome can not be stalemate, something breaks. The irresistible force, no so it must be the object. Logical because we did not say the object was indestructible just immovable. Where to from here. Well either we learn to replace that which is immovable or move that which is indestructible or suffer the loss.
__________________
"Nature is obliged to let reality determine its laws, whereas mathematics is under no such constraint." |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Time for a paradigm shift. Energy is not a potential but emr upon structures; light! Not my fault. Just a fact no one has ever really suggested since Roger Bacon, who so happens to be related. I guess the truth is a 'family tradition.' Quote:
Happiness is knowing; Once we are, we are One! Enjoy. It's all good ... I just have a fight with complacency to deal with for a bit but the ones who really want to know will take up the truth in science, the rest ..... well .... good riddens .... that mentality has the globe in the situation we are in now. Too selfishly proud to really care about the truth and learning for our kids of tomorrow. Next! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
A particle is in a balance if it aborbs from space the same amount of the oscillations than emits. The question is what is a structure of the spacetime ? I can't find what is "emr" in your idea. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
this from my discussion on another site where this idea came up. I agree |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
What is emr? What affect does it impose upon matter? What is the single individual source of all momentum? Energy, and that energy when returned to a base unit is simple a wavelength upon mass or emr upon mass. It does not ‘go through’ space, no medium/aether unless that aether is considered time, then you will see entanglement and what it is. Quote:
Are you still using planck? Or ‘h’ to be clearer….? Angular momentum at the subatomic level does not exist. No particle, no spin …. Common sense! Now in your math create a system, copy them and use the 2 identical systems and associate the resonances, tell me what happens …… hint … see entropy reverse! And if angular momentum is fixed, the results do not equate …… it’s stupid easy! Quote:
Quote:
No space exists without time and I know the concept is ‘stupid easy’ but not shared in relativity or planck. A fixation to the constant has showed results but not when systems associate and why that model is physically incorrect. Proof …. Take a single cell of any living entity, now describe how it abuses entropy. Can’t be done with planck, period! We all know, if we are cold we put on a jacket physically obvious we reversed entropy but in the physics of a system, it is impossible to describe. Space time is not anything curving……. This is a patch to ‘how it works’ in a round about way all based on the fact that the energy between the structures is not taken into account as the cause of the momentum. Google up Cooke and space time and see a few more ideas about space time. Space does not curve ….. gravity is entangled energy and can be described and scaled in van der waals/casimir; fact! Follow each and then ask but I am not interested in someone else’s theories to impose on what this thread is suggesting. Open your own thread but please I do not play in any arena I can prove incorrect, every time. No use in walking the planck, at the end it drops off but if you want to play tic tac toe and want me to prove this game, I’m your huckleberry! And then when you see, I own you! Do the homework first and then let’s dance, otherwise …. I have much to do and the clock is ticking …….. This is for food for thought so people can see ‘how it works.’ I do not need any lessons of old school and when I see a radius applied to time where entangled energy affects the amplitude of associating systems, then I will know you are reading. Otherwise ….. next! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GR and the Universe | RussT | Against the Mainstream | 32 | 05-November-2006 10:58 AM |
| Time Dilation | madman | Against the Mainstream | 153 | 21-December-2005 11:30 PM |
| Presentation Of New Launch Method | yavuzbasturk | Space Exploration | 16 | 16-August-2005 11:03 PM |
| Measuring time | snowflakeuniverse | Against the Mainstream | 7 | 25-June-2004 11:25 AM |
| Big Bang logically impossible | ToSeek | Against the Mainstream | 90 | 02-December-2002 12:24 PM |