Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-July-2007, 03:09 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default About Time....

Time …..

"The surprises keep coming," says physicist David Albert of Columbia University. None is greater than finding loopholes in the hallowed uncertainty principle—and, even more outlandishly, seeing hints that the future may leak into the present

or

They have to accept that subatomic systems can become so "entangled" that measuring one affects the other even if the two are light-years apart, which Einstein called "spooky action at a distance."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19875410/site/newsweek/


Trying to stay with the times …. Using news articles to be accepted by them piers or is it peers …

This is also recognized in the Wheeler experiment when addressing the parameters correctly.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30-July-2007, 03:29 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Finding that the Wheeler Exp is like many and the parameters are what the various scientists are trying to perfect. And then Bohr is returned to that the detector is quite important itself …. Or my words would be ‘no interaction, no thing’ … or wave going through space …. Maybe you will get that later but the key in this is not so much Wheeler but Nicolas Gisin ….. take a few and see it is his work stirring up so much.

http://arxiv.org/find/quant-ph/1/au:.../0/1/0/all/0/1 Index search


http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/p.../0610241v1.pdf


http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/p.../0702130v2.pdf
Detection loophole in asymmetric Bell experiments


http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0704/0704.0758.pdf

Entangling Independent Photons by Time Measurement

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...706.1924v1.pdf

Long-Distance Entanglement Distribution with Single-Photon Sources



Look at how a split energy (hv) by 2 sources can in fact affect the others pair by synchronizing the time exchange rather than a wave phasing of each pair.

This offers a method of seeing that time and exchanges between the filters contradicts a hv/t, hence the interference is the entanglement and time rather than the wave/space itself.

A ‘c’ buster if I ever saw one. May even appear FTL and freaky to our senses.

But what this guy does is work on the methods and devices that many other scientists are using to test their work, the key again is within his developments he is tapping on how it works and planck gets in the way.

By describing the photon at a period in time recognized by the click or set ‘memory,’ then the tendency or probability is set ‘structurally’, by filtering a set hv, by the crystal, the aligning of the period which is entangled to the initial energy but the increased (amplitude) or time magnification is a structural/energy frame shifting hence that observed angular momentum but not a particle movement but a period depending on the distance, hence the scales and the difference which based on the wavelength the inverse square rule (gravity) applies. What to see is a radius to the amplitude/time in relation to the entangled energy between the observation points.

The math is right there but are you ready just yet? Keep this and remember; ‘back when.’

What this is for is to share that ‘time’ is the issue rather than mass or some aether phenomena. Point particles do not exist! Rather if any want to see a real black hole then all mass basically is a black hole between nodes.

Consider a frequency as that scale to energy in relation to time versus distance. Distance only comes into play with interactions. And then time can be seen/described as affected and entanglement shares this when the rendition of energy is corrected.

Back to doing what I do best, covering real material and reinforcing bridges.

‘They’ can wait for the news articles to comprehend since ‘the community’ is so smart but at least the few following can know where these new bridges are originating.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2007, 05:15 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
I agree with the language of things having its own pace B; but can you decribe what your seeing. By example, an engine runs more efficiently when it can breathe better.
IN recognizing energy with it described properties the many per se phenomena are easy to describe. Today’s models within the sciences have missed quite a bit and unless teaching includes the full scope of interactive agencies between mass, the ability to comprehend is reduced.

In other words a chemical description of a metabolic process, may share that by putting water and dirt together you have mud but what are the actual exchanges at the molecular scale will never be known. There is no method to cover the actual exchange of the energy in wavelengths versus heat in a chemical model.

In the frame shared, a physical comprehension of how life exists, exactly why in a scientific frame with no phenomena offers the mind a conclusion sought by every sole since the beginning of time. The same frame reveals how that physical sense of good and bad exists, including exactly how each is actually responsible for their continued existence; after life. All within a physical framework based on energy and the properties of the so called ‘uncertain’ phenomena. There is only one physical way it works and what is within this marries up all branches of the sciences quite literally.

Again there is no phenomena.

If you haven’t noticed, that NO PHENOMENA is what Understanding addresses.

There is not such thing and every phenomenon has a physical cause and it is our current sciences that continue to perpetuate this junk and not real sciences.

It is why the metaphysical beliefs of an after life still exists in the first place and here on this site, all they want is to perpetuate this same focus, and are selling it with heat.

So share an unknown phenomena and let’s walk it through, if the model presented can not directly address it then we have work to do.

Pick anything you like

Quote:
I want to fly
Feed the birds ….. consciously you may not have the wind in your face, but the energy given enriched the ability for that ‘life to continue;’ your flying.

Quote:
i want to move mountains-
As we are but a conscious representing our body, the truth is the “I” of each of us is rather a representation of a whole group of living structures. Same as with a city or country and if the collective is set in motion to accomplish a feat; then the mountain can be moved based on a single idea of one that begins the collective to begin the objective. The idea I like to repeat; if it is good, it will be; if not…. Well you know how that works …. Eventually it will return to ‘dust’ or entropy will reign.

The key here is in recognizing that anything done has responsibilities to the total.

Quote:
and i want to be the Blue Whale.
IN both above, a choice is made to become a part of or support the endeavor, whether to support that life by contributing your physical energy. But in a pure form in belief and conscious interactions, the ability to actually exist within the ‘total’ supporting existence in all characteristics of compassion and love, just by picking up and disposing trash basically, unwittingly, your contribution may appear simply vain but the soil, the trees, the ecosystem and the rolling affects through all things is actually alive and forth based on your contribution by choice.

That whale, as far off the coast and as deep as he/she dives, is actually being affected with or without a comprehensive knowledge to each individual, but the scope of affects are entangled to all other things and just to perpetuate the ‘good’ in support and duty, the rolling affect will become a life within the total, all the way to our beloved Blue Whale.

Now in the east, they claim ‘masters’ can assume the physical such as to change into the critter itself. I haven’t seen this nor have I seen someone ‘walking through a wall.’

MY point is to become a ‘good’ part of the existence in total, the life is entangled to all other within the total and not as an isolated part; cancer.

To consciously become a part of anything or assume a characterization can be imaginative, but to physically change into another ‘organism’ does not make sense in the literal view. By choice we can contribute our energy to support, to change, to impose or even to imagine as each does in fact affect everything else. For example; just to dream about a big dog biting you, in the morning if a dog barks too close, you will be affected in your reaction; you now ‘stepped left’ based on a conception.



Quote:
How will we utilize gravity..
The words I am writing are gravitational in the literal sense rather than as described; weight. Or like going to see your favorite musician; the ‘coming attraction,’ if the exchange offers a sense of ‘being’ apart whether by taste or any other sense of focus towards the energy being conveyed/exchanged has gravity.

Ever wonder about the euphoria a lead guitarist has? He is experiencing the many who are not only listening but recognizes the many playing ‘air guitar’ to his contribution. The interactions can be quite deep. Not to mention Love in itself as these interactions have enormous affects; nations have crumbled over a single Love.

Some times I see gravity as simply a sense of reaction to any change. It is easy to see ‘energy’ in itself is that observed cause of any gravitational affects.

To utilize gravity in a mechanical form is rather easy but some of the ‘newly recognized systems’ need another day as these types of items and weaponry are items I do not like to talk to about. Some items offer mechanisms that I will not discuss for example I was playing with nuclear physics as a kid. If everyone actually knew how easy a weapon is to build we would be in big trouble.

Quote:
by what process do we interact in manifest reality-
Energy. Everything is by exchanges and then if an exchange is entangled, then a reaction can be of that entanglement between the ‘other.’ For example; often twins know the others’ feelings or to see someone kicked in the ‘you-whoo’s’; you can almost feel it. Or ever wonder why people go to a movie? Sit in a chair and by sight and sound we feel what the characters are conveying and pay to experience it.

Every single sense we capture is in the forum of a reception, of various conversion, of energy and every single one can be reduced to a source of emr. This one line is esoteric and often gets hammered but bring’em on …. And if you bring each item whether sight, sound, aromatic or pressures, all have what as the force or cause? EMR in one wavelength or a bunch, in every case. These are the ‘stupid easy’ parts I just can’t understand why the ‘community’ just doesn’t see.

Quote:
why's too much computational horsepower, never enough.
Because of applications.

One guy here wanted to have sex with robots or basically that unless he can imagine his shoes being tied and a robot comes and ties them for him by his mental exchange of ‘that is what I want’ … they will never be happy. Soon the next desire will be BJ’s in various textures.

These are from selfish needs, something to sell and being promoted as something every household should have in our modern society but with these selfish needs there are costs and the last in line within this ‘loss to the common’ is the environment.

We as a species are the only thing building damn’s and skyscrapers with complete disregard to the environment, sold as a good thing but in most every case the rolling affect is a negative within the total. That building did not make life better it made a person rich.

That damn did not help society it made it easier in the eyes of man, but decimates whole ecosystems.

And all of us are a part of this total. We do not have a right to this period, we are a part of it and our duty is to learn how to be a part, share this knowledge and give our life a chance to ‘support life to continue’ or we effectively kill ourselves by becoming a ‘cancer’ or physically a ‘loss to the common,’ based on these isolating pursuits.

At this point; to begin a pursuit within the framework being suggested, the medical field will finally be a comprehensible field as they describe and understand how to address many ailments in an exponential scale.

Within the gifts of knowledge and especially the medical field all colors of the species will listen. The differences should only be of opinion when the sciences can be perfected bringing facts and truth to the front and when truth is recognized to be physically functioning, then to comprehend how this ‘physical’ is also what vindicates the metaphysical, then all colors and all races can be unified in one species equally known as man.

To understand the basics makes it easy and every single line mentioned is based on a simple set of rules vindicating the philosophical renditions, tying in the scientific renditions and purely fulfilling the theological renditions.

That One Aristilian approach to existence.

The Tao!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 07:23 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Are there enough predictions in this thread or do we need to add a few more?

How about we hammer on chemistry a little and show that interactions of structures have a path opposing the simple entropic models?

It's 'about time,' someone took on the globe in a scientific frame.

Can't shake facts!

Don't care much about the theological renditions as the hobby only shared what it all means.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 08:47 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 3,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bishadi View Post
Time …..

"The surprises keep coming," says physicist David Albert of Columbia University. None is greater than finding loopholes in the hallowed uncertainty principle—and, even more outlandishly, seeing hints that the future may leak into the present
or
They have to accept that subatomic systems can become so "entangled" that measuring one affects the other even if the two are light-years apart, which Einstein called "spooky action at a distance."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19875410/site/newsweek/

Trying to stay with the times …. Using news articles to be accepted by them piers or is it peers …

This is also recognized in the Wheeler experiment when addressing the parameters correctly.
Although it is only a few days old, there is nothing new in this article. Only the sort of sensationalistic reportage one would expect to hear from a correspondent from Newsweek.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-August-2007, 07:45 AM
czeslaw czeslaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,279
Default

Hi Bishadi
the entanglement may suggest that there isn't a free will ?
Does our choice result of the one determined plan ?
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-August-2007, 01:53 AM
Michael Noonan's Avatar
Michael Noonan Michael Noonan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Deep in thought
Posts: 1,631
Smile Free will with strings

Hello bishadi,

I posted this on another site but seems applicable regarding free will. This is my post 555 so I had hoped it might be OK and not just a Hollywood.

"There was a great Armenian mind Georges Ivanovich Gurdjieff.
He taught dance and wisdom and was known to teach that the ordinary human mind is in a state of almost sleep.

It was the rare mind that was more attuned to the realization of of consciousness. The concept of a link to all thought is not so strange. The really big challenge is whether we can rise up to push ourselves beyond or through the boundary of paths set in motion for us.

If all thought is known, then free will is being able to make choice. Choice may not be as easy as we would like to believe. Imagine having the whole pressure of a predicted future based on the thoughts you make and reshaping the universe to accommodate them accordingly.

Consciousness is the key, all of us have a degree of consciousness. The key to knowing a choice is to firmly implant it and meditate upon it and feel the inner self guiding if it is good. Then firmly meditate upon the other. If it feels better or worse that may be because it is.

Understanding consciousness is knowing you have choice, but it may actually take a whole lot more effort than you really might think it does. Something to think on or better still get a group to think on it.

The small everyday thoughts that we don't think on or make so little difference may come easy as a system fights to maintain balance. But the thoughts big or small that will cause profound effect because they radically alter the path, get you out of the rut so to speak may be nearly impossible to change.

Just as a world tends to chaos, that same pressure that drives thought to order may have that order preselected and it may take unbelievable will or wont power and possibly the help of many to make it.
__________________
"Nature is obliged to let reality determine its laws, whereas mathematics is under no such constraint."
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-August-2007, 04:55 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar View Post
Although it is only a few days old, there is nothing new in this article. Only the sort of sensationalistic reportage one would expect to hear from a correspondent from Newsweek.
You are correct. The term used by the Big E, is not new but the comprehension that entangled energy shares the errors to any constant and specifically "c"


When one group is fevorishly supporting relativity and the use of Virial to comprehend and predict, the fact remains it is at the core of energy and the description herein that are the reason for the errors.

Time is that 'aether' between the nodes of H and the imposition to the period, is mass.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-August-2007, 06:03 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Hi Bishadi
the entanglement may suggest that there isn't a free will ?
Then you are thinking but do not 'choose to quit' just because this is realized.

Quote:
Does our choice result of the one determined plan ?
Seem like De ja vu .....

Look all over the globe, changes are occuring in the sciences and only within the sciences will the globe have to ability to comprehend and allow peace to reign.

Many layers will be crumbling in the near future.

War is coming!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-August-2007, 06:43 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bishadi View Post
Seem like De ja vu .....

Look all over the globe, changes are occuring in the sciences and only within the sciences will the globe have to ability to comprehend and allow peace to reign.

Many layers will be crumbling in the near future.

War is coming!
Wow!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-August-2007, 01:43 PM
Michael Noonan's Avatar
Michael Noonan Michael Noonan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Deep in thought
Posts: 1,631
Smile Not necessarily

Quote:
Originally Posted by bishadi View Post
Then you are thinking but do not 'choose to quit' just because this is realized.

Seem like De ja vu .....

Look all over the globe, changes are occuring in the sciences and only within the sciences will the globe have to ability to comprehend and allow peace to reign.

Many layers will be crumbling in the near future.

War is coming!
That may be one opinion. There is the distinct possibility of many realities. Einstein was quoted "God does not play dice" which interestingly is in contrast to Richard Feynman's area of probability based on light vectors.

Either we have light in Newton's rings as certainties or Einstein as nice a gentleman as he was, was not necessarily speaking infallibly.

The thing about absolutes is that they are not:- case in point
An irresistible force meets an immovable object.

Outcome can not be stalemate, something breaks. The irresistible force, no so it must be the object. Logical because we did not say the object was indestructible just immovable.

Where to from here.

Well either we learn to replace that which is immovable or move that which is indestructible or suffer the loss.
__________________
"Nature is obliged to let reality determine its laws, whereas mathematics is under no such constraint."
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-August-2007, 03:51 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Well either we learn to replace that which is immovable or move that which is indestructible or suffer the loss.
May case in point:

Time for a paradigm shift.

Energy is not a potential but emr upon structures; light!

Not my fault. Just a fact no one has ever really suggested since Roger Bacon, who so happens to be related.

I guess the truth is a 'family tradition.'

Quote:
That may be one opinion
And what is my favorite line of wisdom.

Happiness is knowing; Once we are, we are One!

Enjoy.

It's all good ...

I just have a fight with complacency to deal with for a bit but the ones who really want to know will take up the truth in science, the rest ..... well .... good riddens .... that mentality has the globe in the situation we are in now. Too selfishly proud to really care about the truth and learning for our kids of tomorrow.

Next!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2007, 08:19 AM
czeslaw czeslaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bishadi View Post
May case in point:

Time for a paradigm shift.

Energy is not a potential but emr upon structures; light!

Next!
In my idea energy is not a potential too. It is an inwards oscillation of the spacetime. A sum of the oscillation results in spacetime curvature and gradient of the oscillations density results in gravity.
A particle is in a balance if it aborbs from space the same amount of the oscillations than emits.
The question is what is a structure of the spacetime ?

I can't find what is "emr" in your idea.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 14-August-2007, 02:36 AM
north north is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by czeslaw View Post
In my idea energy is not a potential too. It is an inwards oscillation of the spacetime. A sum of the oscillation results in spacetime curvature and gradient of the oscillations density results in gravity.
A particle is in a balance if it aborbs from space the same amount of the oscillations than emits.
The question is what is a structure of the spacetime ?

I can't find what is "emr" in your idea.
the structure of space-time is perhaps " fields " emanating from the matter that is IN space. but not from space or time its self.

this from my discussion on another site where this idea came up. I agree
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 14-August-2007, 06:44 PM
bishadi bishadi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
In my idea energy is not a potential too.
Either ….

Quote:
I can't find what is "emr" in your idea.
You are not reading.

What is emr? What affect does it impose upon matter? What is the single individual source of all momentum? Energy, and that energy when returned to a base unit is simple a wavelength upon mass or emr upon mass. It does not ‘go through’ space, no medium/aether unless that aether is considered time, then you will see entanglement and what it is.

Quote:
It is an inwards oscillation of the spacetime. A sum of the oscillation results in spacetime curvature and gradient of the oscillations density results in gravity.
I disagree …..

Are you still using planck? Or ‘h’ to be clearer….? Angular momentum at the subatomic level does not exist. No particle, no spin …. Common sense!

Now in your math create a system, copy them and use the 2 identical systems and associate the resonances, tell me what happens …… hint … see entropy reverse! And if angular momentum is fixed, the results do not equate …… it’s stupid easy!

Quote:
A particle is in a balance if it aborbs from space the same amount of the oscillations than emits.
Emits what? Are you maybe pointing at emr ……. Or are you sharing the imposition to time and space based on these oscillations, is mass?

Quote:
The question is what is a structure of the spacetime ?
Simple…. Can you measure from point a to b without time?

No space exists without time and I know the concept is ‘stupid easy’ but not shared in relativity or planck. A fixation to the constant has showed results but not when systems associate and why that model is physically incorrect.

Proof …. Take a single cell of any living entity, now describe how it abuses entropy.

Can’t be done with planck, period!

We all know, if we are cold we put on a jacket physically obvious we reversed entropy but in the physics of a system, it is impossible to describe.

Space time is not anything curving……. This is a patch to ‘how it works’ in a round about way all based on the fact that the energy between the structures is not taken into account as the cause of the momentum.

Google up Cooke and space time and see a few more ideas about space time.

Space does not curve ….. gravity is entangled energy and can be described and scaled in van der waals/casimir; fact!

Follow each and then ask but I am not interested in someone else’s theories to impose on what this thread is suggesting. Open your own thread but please I do not play in any arena I can prove incorrect, every time.

No use in walking the planck, at the end it drops off but if you want to play tic tac toe and want me to prove this game, I’m your huckleberry!

And then when you see, I own you! Do the homework first and then let’s dance, otherwise …. I have much to do and the clock is ticking ……..

This is for food for thought so people can see ‘how it works.’ I do not need any lessons of old school and when I see a radius applied to time where entangled energy affects the amplitude of associating systems, then I will know you are reading.

Otherwise ….. next!
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GR and the Universe RussT Against the Mainstream 32 05-November-2006 10:58 AM
Time Dilation madman Against the Mainstream 153 21-December-2005 11:30 PM
Presentation Of New Launch Method yavuzbasturk Space Exploration 16 16-August-2005 11:03 PM
Measuring time snowflakeuniverse Against the Mainstream 7 25-June-2004 11:25 AM
Big Bang logically impossible ToSeek Against the Mainstream 90 02-December-2002 12:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today