Stonehenge an hommage to Pi Number and Astronomical knowledge?First memorial construct after the flod.
http://members.aol.com/stoneequation/

What leads to stonehenge in the first place.
http://members.aol.com/realbabel/

An
Astronomical Enigma
http://members.aol.com/astroequation/

Very interesting.
I see there is no update on the letter sent 23/7/01. I may look for an accurate diagram and superimpose it myself. The math may be above my head but I will try and muddle through it.
Has anyone else tried independent verification?

__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/

We have already discussed about this here
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...&start=275

This graph (see link below ) shown clearly a relation betwen the inner orbit an the outher orbit of the planets
You take the size of the orbit of Mercury,
process it trough the equation, and out comes the size of the orbit of
Mars. Then you plug in Venus's orbit and get out Jupiter's. Then Earth
gives Saturn, and Mars gives Uranus.
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/astroeq...s/38eee982.jpg

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/astroequation/mathone.htm

An analysis of that equation gives this:
This equation has several degrees of freedom, i.e.
parameters that were selected to make the equation fit the
orbits of the planets. The parameters are (9/4*pi), ln30,
(2/3*pi) and F. Given the way that the formula is laid out,
I would say even the 9,4 and 2,3 are separate parameters. These
parameters were then selected so that the formula gives the
distances to the planets from the Sun in AU. Therefore, it
is not surprising at all that the result for earth is 1, because
the equation was selected to achieve just that result.
If the Origin of the equation is really from
there, this is the demonstration that mankind in the past have an advanced knowledge of the mechanics of the solar system and the constant Pi to say the least!
http://hometown.aol.com/stoneequation/index.htm
Taking all the above facts into consideration, it is difficult to maintain the notion that the Solar System originated solely by the action of gravity on a random distribution of dust particles."
The question is what is the forces causing this observed fact of order?
The easy answer could be:
The Anthropic Principle at work,but
that explain nothing!

I just did a quick intro to The Anthropic Principle. Is this the same theory that assumes that if the mass of the universe, before the big bang, were any greater or lesser; it would not have formed?

__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/

Or our Universe would have grossly different properties. The properties would in fact be so different that it is highly likely that life (as we know it) would not develop and be around to ask the question of why the Universe is special.

As example life on earth depend of our previleged position in the solar system.

Do you mean it could be giant clouds with no stars, or giant planets with no suns etc?

__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/

Maybe only dust and gas.

You're scaring me. I don't want to die before I was born.


:wink:

__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/