Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #331 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 12:48 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clear Lake City, TX
Posts: 4,160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsig View Post
All of the objections I have seen to evolution amount to " (Humans) didn't come from no monkey".
Which pleases monkeys no end.
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
Isaac Asimov
  #332 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 01:46 PM
Lonest@r Lonest@r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsig View Post
Hey I got a few days to spare so I'll just study geology, genetics, biology, astronomy and chemistry up to the post-grad level.
Exactly... LOL, Well I did a little reading last night, or should I say I tried, it seems most of the links where journal articles which require a PHD in biology to decipher and understand, such as endogenous retroviruses (ERV), HERV, LTR, ORFS, RNA and DNA....

However I did find a couple that used ENGLISH....
ERV Basics and How Species Arise , and the snakes and wolfs....
As for the snakes and wolves, seems like basic breeding and natural selection to me, the snakes that could not eat poisonous toads lived.

The ERV thing is interesting. One thing, if evolution creates more complexity as things evolve, why does humans have fewer chromosomes than apes?

Also, I would like to point out from these sites..
Quote:
the authors open with a vigorous argument for the reality of species, they admit that "we lack the rigorous studies needed to convince skeptics....

Creationists and intelligent design advocates like to think that because some ERVs have useful functions in the human genome, they must have been deliberately put there by a creator / designer with that particular purpose in mind. Of course, no-one can explicitly prove that that is incorrect - it's not a falsifiable hypothesis, and therefore it's not science.

I did find another interesting site, haven't had much time to read, maybe you would like to comment...
American Scientific Affiliation

One interesting read,
In The Beginning
Quote:
Blessed with new instruments like the Hubble Space Telescope and other space-based observatories, a new generation of their giant cousins on the ground and ever-faster computer networks, cosmology is entering ''a golden age'' in which data are finally outrunning speculation.

In other ways this new dark universe is utterly baffling, a road map to new mysteries. Dr. Marc Davis, a cosmologist at the University of California at Berkeley, called it ''a universe chock full of exotics that don't make sense to anybody.''

Moreover there are some questions that scientists still do not know how to ask, let alone answer, scientifically. Was there anything before the Big Bang? Is there a role for life in the cosmos? Why is there something rather than nothing at all? Will we ever know?

''We know much, but we still understand very little,'' said Dr. Michael Turner, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago.
  #333 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 02:05 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonest@r View Post
[...] if evolution creates more complexity as things evolve [...]
Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't.
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
  #334 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 02:32 PM
tsig's Avatar
tsig tsig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the show me state
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disinfo Agent View Post
Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't.
We seem to have unearthed one of the central errors of the anti-evolution crowd, that evolution has some direction.

Mutations provides the variability the environment determines the survivability no directions needed.

NB:mine own personal view YMMV.
  #335 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 02:36 PM
tsig's Avatar
tsig tsig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the show me state
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim View Post
Which pleases monkeys no end.
Well we're still the cousins that no one comes to visit.

Come on now, whens the last time you had a Bonobo over for dinner.

I never even get cards.
  #336 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 02:38 PM
tsig's Avatar
tsig tsig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the show me state
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Which is true.

We are of the Ape variety.

Hey... I'm not all that enthusiastic about it either. Why couldn't we have come from Lions?

Oh well. I cannot control it.
We already have too much Pride.
  #337 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 02:44 PM
Fortis Fortis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonest@r View Post
The ERV thing is interesting. One thing, if evolution creates more complexity as things evolve, why does humans have fewer chromosomes than apes?
I'm guessing that you don't read New Scientist? Only a few weeks ago they had an article on the top 10 misconceptions that people have about evolution. Increasing complexity was one of them...

Do you have a source for the increasing complexity?
  #338 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 02:50 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,025
Default

Quote:
The ERV thing is interesting. One thing, if evolution creates more complexity as things evolve, why does humans have fewer chromosomes than apes?
Who says evolution creates more complexity?

Humans and Chimps have the same number of chromosomes. One of us has 2 fused together into one. See if you can find out which one it is.

Also see if you canfind out how little the DNA of Humans and Chimps differs.

Also look at Vitamin C production. Humans have all the genes needed to produce Vitamin C but a couple of them have mutated and don't work anymore, Apes have the same mutation.
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'

Last edited by captain swoop; 29-April-2008 at 03:40 PM. Reason: Typo
  #339 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 03:15 PM
tsig's Avatar
tsig tsig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the show me state
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
Who says evolution creates more complexity?

Humans and Chimps have the same number of chromosomes. One of us has 2 fused together into one. See if you can find out which one it is.

Also see if you canfind out how little the DNA of Humans and Chimps differs.

Also look at Vitamin C production. Humans have all the genes needed to produce DNA but a couple of them have mutated and don't work anymore, Apes have the same mutation.
A nobel or a typo?lol
  #340 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 03:40 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,025
Default

Oops, fixed it.
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
  #341 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 03:49 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Which is true.

We are of the Ape variety.
My understanding--and physical anthropology class was a long time ago, with paleontology longer--is that before apes, our ancestors were monkeyish, and before that, lemurish. Which is fine by me; I like lemurs.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
  #342 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 04:22 PM
Lonest@r Lonest@r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
Who says evolution creates more complexity?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsig
We seem to have unearthed one of the central errors of the anti-evolution crowd, that evolution has some direction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortis
I'm guessing that you don't read New Scientist? Only a few weeks ago they had an article on the top 10 misconceptions that people have about evolution. Increasing complexity was one of them...

Do you have a source for the increasing complexity?
Never stated evolution must provide increased complexity.... in fact my argument is exact oppisite, evolution would seemingly create more and more disorder, a world of mutts. So does this mean ape is more 'complex' than human? How does intellect factor in?

Go ahead and feverishly post to expose my 'misconception'. And I'm the one accused of focusing on one word while misunderstanding the whole concept.

Again, were getting way off topic, too many details, can't see the forest for the trees.

What I would like to address,,,



Quote:
In the Beginning
Dr. Peebles of Princeton, who has often acted as the conscience of the cosmological community, trying to put the brakes on faddish trends.

He wonders whether the situation today can be compared to another historical era, around 1900, when many people thought that physics was essentially finished and when the English physicist Lord Kelvin said that just a couple of ''clouds'' remained to be dealt with.

''A few annoying tidbits, which turned out to be relativity and quantum theory,'' the twin revolutions of 20th-century science, Dr. Peebles said.

Likewise, there are a few clouds today like what he called ''the dark sector,'' which could have more complicated physics than cosmologists think.

''I'm not convinced these clouds herald revolutions as deep as relativity and quantum mechanics,'' Dr. Peebles said. ''I'm not arguing that they won't.''

As for the fate of the universe, we will never have a firm answer, said Dr. Sandage, who was Hubble's protégé and has seen it all.

''It's like asking, 'Does God exist?' '' he said.

Predicting the future, he pointed out, requires faith that simple mathematical models really work to describe the universe.

''I don't think we really know how things work,'' he said.
We don't really know how things work. We are taking 'scientific' observations, theoretical calculations and 'scientific' models; making predictions; and sometimes presenting it as fact or "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent."
  #343 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 04:35 PM
John Jones's Avatar
John Jones John Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonest@r View Post
Never stated evolution must provide increased complexity.... [...]
Then explain this:

Quote:
One thing, if evolution creates more complexity as things evolve, why does humans have fewer chromosomes than apes?
It sure looks to me like you presumed that evolution creates more complexity.
__________________
Quote:
If you admire him so much, then how about you learn to spell his name right?

It's Niels Bohr.
Olsen the moderator.
  #344 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 04:50 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,025
Default

Which Apes have more Chromosomes than humans? how does that relate to percieved 'Complexity' ? Some horses have more chromasomes than othe horses, which horse would be more complex?

Also explain in this context what you think a 'Mutt' is?
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
  #345 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 04:52 PM
Lonest@r Lonest@r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
Then explain this:
Quote:
One thing, if evolution creates more complexity as things evolve, why does humans have fewer chromosomes than apes?
It sure looks to me like you presumed that evolution creates more complexity.
I said, IF, based on explanation that complex organisms evolved from simple organisms, and that humans are considered/thought to be much more 'advanced' than ape.
  #346 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 05:23 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,025
Default

Who thinks a human is more 'advanced' than an ape? what is the thing you are measuring?
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
  #347 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 05:53 PM
John Jones's Avatar
John Jones John Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonest@r View Post
I said, IF, based on explanation that complex organisms evolved from simple organisms, and that humans are considered/thought to be much more 'advanced' than ape.
I saw it. It still looks like you presumed that evolution is supposed to lead to more complex organisms.
__________________
Quote:
If you admire him so much, then how about you learn to spell his name right?

It's Niels Bohr.
Olsen the moderator.
  #348 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 06:03 PM
Lonest@r Lonest@r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
Who thinks a human is more 'advanced' than an ape? what is the thing you are measuring?
Chimps more evolved than humans
Quote:
contradict the conventional wisdom that humans are the result of a high degree of genetic selection, evidenced by our relatively large brains, cognitive abilities and bipedalism.
Human Evolution
Quote:
Australopithecus, whose earliest known fossils are about four million years old, is a genus with some features closer to apes and some closer to modern humans. In brain size, Australopithecus was barely more advanced than apes...

Homo had an average brain size one-and-a-half times larger than that of Australopithecus, though still substantially smaller than that of modern humans..Early Homo, with its larger brain than Australopithecus, was a maker of stone tools.

More recent species with larger brains generally used more sophisticated tools than more ancient species.
Study may show chimps may have undergone more 'changes', but who is considered more 'advanced'?
  #349 (permalink)  
Old 29-April-2008, 06:18 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,025
Default

I don't think any organism is more 'advanced' Everything is evolved into it's own niche
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'