|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
OK, I again will try to consolidate a few questions that I have.
1) I was thinking about space and what is space. People here say that space is nothing. They give examples of expanding balloons and the like and say that space is just the distance between particles. I disagree with this. Space is the canvas that matter is painted on. ( heh ... well more complicated than that) Space is not nothing. When space expands it has a specific meaning. Space has properties. The space right outside a black hole differs from the space in the deepest void of the universe. Rates of expansion, curvature, temperature?? Space can have state. Space is not nothing. 2) Space is gravity. Without gravity there is no such thing as space. A true vacuum can not exist. Our universe or at least our visible universe is all connected because at every point in space there is some energy and some gravity. Space does not exist outside of this definition. Gravity not only curves space by it is space. Space and gravity and energy go hand in hand, one can not exist without the other. 3) Because matter and energy are conserved based on the first law of thermodynamics, space is also conserved. What does that even mean? That means that the total amount of space in the universe remains constant. Space can curve, but when space is curved other space needs to be curved to compensate for this curvature. 4) the perceived expansion of the universe is the compensation for the curvature from all the gravity in the universe.
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bold mine: Quote:
I don't know exactly what bitterness drove you to make such a post, but I should think you need to Check It. I'm sure you are well aware that is not how science works and that science - as a concept- is about knowing what space is. The conflicts only arise when people speculate wildly without any supporting evidence, supporting mathematics to demonstrate, or operating under assumptions, misguided thinking or misconceptions that we already know to be incorrect. Quote:
Quote:
This is like Conspiracy Proposing: The scientists are lying in order to keep their jobs. Sheesh Apparently you don't follow many scientific journals!Again Noonan, I really thought you knew better. I'm disappointed. Perhaps some of your proposals are what didn't hold water. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am quite sure I didn't say that scientists are lying. It is just that after a year or more on the outer I would like to see tommac get a pleasant run as he has a lot of really good questions and I do remember being given the run around. But then I am not currently looking to enroll in a physics course. In fact space is surprisingly difficult from a quantum perspective based on the potential multiple universe theory of cosmology which means a lot of things that we would naturally think of as being real do not exist in our time frame. Case in point the GPS satellites are about 11 seconds slower in real their time compared to earth based time due to not being in the gravity well of the earth. In a way it could even be said based on quantum particle uncertainty principles that it might even be doubtful they were made in the universe we exist in. A bit far fetched, well every second all that we know goes through 10^44 Planck time intervals in which all movement is calculated. Can one assume the calculation holds true for something so far out in space and of the what of the Voyager probes. On that thought about the strangeness of space little errors change of protocols, variations in code and design all have to be considered. If communication stops is it a fault in our universe or the one that the probe originated in? Space is not well defined and an accepted and highly accurate definition would indeed go a long way to advancing the cause of science. And yes Neverfly I must be a grumpy old man today but every time I look at something that appears so simple it gets very complex. Either that or my circular thinking is annoyingly complex to someone who wants everything to be more simple, me. Whatever you do tommac I hope it goes well for you and you enjoy it. Alternately there is an ignore button if I am too abrupt, sorry all ![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Scientists want to understand the actual nature. Quote:
Quote:
Tommac can do well if he sets his sights on learning. Not dreaming and then blaming the mainstreamers and 'arrogant' scientists when his dreams get rejected. I'm sorry if I'm blunt- but that's just the reality. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
These are outrageous claims to make. As Per the rules I hope youcan support threm and show ussome evidence or retract.
__________________
All Moderation in Purple To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: ───────────────────────────────────────────── ◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ► |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I believe in all walks of life if one is on the verge of discovery the last thing to do is blab the secret source of success. Also I do not know people in scientific circles and hearsay about secrecy although heard is hardly ground for proof but I do not want to roll over on this either. There are secrets in all walks of life, I got a few still. And besides the post is in ATM so why wouldn't it be attacked mercilessly. Having said that I would get kicked out before trying to discredit or name anyone for saying what they think about me because it would be unfair. Twenty months here has been great, its a good forum and good people. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
See above.
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues. Neptune- The original Dark Matter. The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As predicted by both Special and General Relativity, GPS satellites clocks tick faster, relative to clocks on Earth, by around 38 microseconds (38,000 nanoseconds) a day. |
|
||||
|
Does this mean you are on my side or neverfly?
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you dont get it ... I am trying to learn the mainstream ... I just go about it a bit differently.
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Well this is where it gets tricky ... the proof would be to take the gravitational field of the entire visible universe and divide it by the size of the visible universe and see if it matches the expansion of the universe ( with an opposite sign. ) would that be the cosmological constant?
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
(1) The "GPS clocks" are based on standard atomic clocks which in fact have a net deviation from clocks stationary on the ground of about 38 microseconds per day (more precisely measured, 442.5 parts per 1012) fast. However, they are corrected (via a frequency synthesizer), to run at the same standard rate as we would expect on the ground. Thus strictly speaking, "GPS clocks" run at very nearly the same rate as a stationary, ground-based clock. Any residual errors are fixed by ground control. (2) Michael Noonan's post, to which this was a response, was wrong in two respects. First, being farther out of the Earth's gravity well makes the clock run faster, not slower. Looked at the other way round, clocks on the Earth's surface run slower due to the Earth's gravity. To carry that further, in the intense gravity immediately surrounding (but outside) a black hole, time runs quite slowly. Second, the relevant GR effect is about 45 microseconds a day fast, not 11 seconds slow (whatever that might mean). Note that the difference between the GR effect (~45 microseconds/day) and the observed deviation (~38 microseconds/day) is due to the SR effect of the orbital speed of the GPS satellites, which slows the clocks slightly from our perspective. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Not according to GR. Maybe in your new model.
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues. Neptune- The original Dark Matter. The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth |
|
|||
|
Empty space is not nothing. Empty space is where we put stuff and that makes it the most useful thing in the world. Lao- tse explained this in 500 BC.
We join spokes together in a wheel, but it is the center hole that makes the wagon move. We shape clay into a pot, but it is the emptiness inside that holds whatever we want. We hammer wood for a house, but it is the inner space that makes it livable. We work with being, but non-being is what we use. From the Tao De Ching Translated by Stephen Mitchell http://acc6.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~p.../taote-v3.html |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I need to learn mathematics to communicate as it is the language of science and in twenty months here have had ample time to do an on-line course which means I am lazy. I need to study the English language because communicating ideas is essential and that is more than natural talent, it is essential to know. Using a musical instrument does not make one a musician and the same with words which is why writers are so important. I wanted to describe an idea of a black hole being the boundary of something like the Eagle Nebula and how its destruction is similar to a coronal mass ejection (CME). Just as a CME is related to a solar tsunami so to a nebula collapse would relate to a black hole collapse. If one knew the positions of both the black hole and the nebula then the instant insertion of the Eagle Nebula into 'normal' space time would mean an instant structure collapse faster than the speed of light from one end to the other. At the same time a massive gamma burst from the connected location in space of the black hole as it collapses of which the light would arrive at our location relative to our distance to the black hole and the nebula, so occurrence of one should predict the other. There is other space stuff but we can go into it later if you are still interested. Most of all I need to apologize to all members of the BAUT community for my bad tempered outburst and yes I retract all of my unsupported statements. My hero in cosmology is Albert Einstein because he had an idea and made the effort to learn the mathematics that described a different space to the one he knew. He waited his time and had the confidence that his idea was good and made his name because he wrote from within the community. A woo woo is someone who is a noisy idea holder that does not make the effort to know what they are challenging. If an idea is good and it survives the teaching process and is worth pursuing then it will cost in commitment or resources if funding someone else to do the work for and often both. To make BAUT a great starting point will mean an investment. What we get out of it depends on how much one is prepared to commit to it, otherwise pray for a miracle. |
|
||||
|
Space is not just the center hole in the wagon wheel. or the emptiness inside a clay pot. Or the inside of a house ... its not its not. Or maybe it is all of those things but that space is not really empty. In fact I dont believe that there can ever be empty space.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Under energy matter equivalence could there be some energy in space that would lessen the mass of an object more than calculated to reduce conserved momentum? Certainly the temperature of the probe would have been factored in for heat loss, it is receiving less of the energy from the sun as it moves further outwards. Maybe it is energy gain redirected as a negative propulsion then in some sort of propelling arc forwards or outwards towards the edge of the solar system but then that is applying electric universe ideology. So I wont go there. Is the shape of the gravity well of the solar system uniform or is it also sitting in a larger deformation changing the curvature of space? Space appears to be increasing in a uniform non linear manner with regard to matter and may be as much a key to gravity as anything else or understanding what matter is. I will admit to being partial to worm holes because the ease of interaction with energy and ability to simulate matter and the forces make them an obvious candidate. However without the benefit of knowing the mathematics my limited understanding of the obvious based on the Internet is ... |
|
||||
|
This is going out on a limb but kind of can work into some of my other assumptions of the universe. What if all space was a gravitational field ... near mass it is stronger but out in empty space there still exists a gravitational field that does not come from mass ( or conversely comes from ALL mass in the universe ). This would be able to explain the redshift as well as possibly explaining the voyager thing.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Could there be frame dragging from the galaxy or something like that?
Quote:
__________________
http://www.whatisorganicliving.com http://www.cancerfightforums.com/forum/ http://www.nycbrownies.com "Banned by BAUT" Alumni (2008) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Many times I am thinking along one path and yet the explanation will make little if any sense to someone reading it with the concept of another. So much of what is in the universe is paired or seems to be able to have a path in and out. The tube analogy where it has an end is one paired with another or a blister in a tube where at a point it opens out at a two Klein bottle shape giving it one tube line in and one out like a knot in the pipe. Strange words but it means much of the energy of a wormhole can be contained and out of our frame of space and the gravity is still applicable to the rest frame of the energy whether we see it or not. Before it gets too deep this has some very strange implications with respect to time and is more of a single perceived universe with multiple potential updating capacity. So we see our existence as only the knot in the pipe and not the connection. It gives us one reality and allows just the energy we need in our frame. It would mean gravity all over space and clustered near the greatest collections of blisters in our frame on the tubes which we would see as mass. But that is really weird and very ATM and would be an awfully difficult idea to try and prove. Quote:
I would expect to see mirror symmetry at some point in structure and so certain layers of structure up should set the picture for how the much larger structures further up will function. The odd thing is that life experience is then described as travelling with the blister or stretch point in a continuity of energy, much of which we can't see in our time frame. I hope that helps. It is hard to describe a picture and worse if the picture is hard to imagine. |
|
||||
|
If the last post sounds a bit strange it is because I am trying to look at the observer as being compromised by being part of the reality he is seeing from within that reality. So what the observer is seeing is not the nature of the reality he is in.
Doing it that way avoids the bizarro concept of a worm hole requiring one end in this universe and another end in an opposite charge part of the universe. It is a possibility though. The trouble is there are so many strange logic possibilities the trouble is finding which one. The idea of a bulge in the line gives the possibility of connected thought to past and future times but with the bulk of the energy at one frame point. Given the difficulty of communication in present times it wouldn't be hard to think that other frame references might not have any significant impact. So that is where I am up to with connection within reality ... in knots. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Privatization of Space | The Bad Astronomer | Space Exploration | 177 | 28-August-2009 08:13 PM |
| How did mass travel faster than light? | ManInTheMirror | Astronomy | 90 | 10-January-2007 02:31 PM |
| The Future to Exploration of Space | StarLab | Astronomy | 31 | 18-August-2005 01:05 AM |
| Favourite astronomy book(s) | kashi | Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories | 40 | 10-June-2004 10:36 AM |
| 100+ Space products and services | cygonaut | Space Exploration | 0 | 07-October-2003 10:55 PM |