|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
OK ... I have a question ... borders on ATM. So I will put it in ATM and a mod could put it in questions if need be.
So here was my monday morning thought: At the singularity of the big bang the gravity well must have been HUGE ... ( If gravity didnt exist then lets take the first moment when gravity did exist ) Now if we are in a brane, and the brane next to us was in this state ... we would get the effects of some of that gravity right? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
tommac. Yes, unless it expands away superluminally in an inflaton. P.S. This one was a no-braner. pete
__________________
A third rate theory forbids A second rate theory explains after the fact A first rate theory predicts...A. Lomonosov |
|
|||
|
So that would mean that the universe next door could cause a gravitational effect accross our universe.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BBT breaks physical laws according to YEC | pbethala | Against the Mainstream | 14 | 09-April-2008 05:19 AM |
| Cutting the Cord on the Big Bang | Jerry | Against the Mainstream | 92 | 28-December-2004 08:38 AM |
| Quite dumb questions re: the Big Bang. Please bear with me. | Eldaran | Astronomy | 11 | 08-October-2004 02:42 PM |
| big bang brane model | robertgrunberg | Against the Mainstream | 4 | 31-March-2004 08:34 PM |
| Help - Big Bang | Moccomouse | Astronomy | 12 | 02-August-2003 04:42 AM |