Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 12:43 AM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default The growing earth.... :P

Hello people.
This is my first ever post on the forum I would just like to introduce myself.
I have an O'level in chemistry. Thats it. No PHD no years of exerience, nothing realy. Ive been reading a bit on this, tonight for the first time. And to me it makes perfect sense.......... Please read on.
I dont know about physics, I'm not even quite sure how an internal combustion engine works, but what I do know is that if you take a gas and cool it, it condenses, (becomes liquid, I think. There you go thats about the extent of my knowlege.)
This being the case......
If earth was created Billions of years ago, soley of gasses and stardust, with the aid of gravity, it would have eventually created a mass yes (the Earth) surrounded by gases (Y/N?).
We are told that the "universe" is expanding, along with our galaxy, therefore the Earth is moving away from the Sun right? Eventually these gases surronding the earth would have condensed, to create a liquid covering the entire Earth. (Y/N?) (basic laws of chemistry and physics).
If the continual movement of the Earth moving away from the Sun caused a reduction in gravity then the Earth Would expand causing rifts in the upper crust allowing the liquid to subside, and the land mass to reveal itself.

Please tell me if I am talking from my BUTT, but if this is not a reasonable hypothesis then it goes against the laws of chemistry and phisics in my understanding.
Please excuse my spelling and grammar. I'm having trouble editing the post. Thanks for listening.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 01:55 AM
stutefish stutefish is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,113
Default

Apparently the force of expansion we have observed is weaker than the force of gravity over less-than-intergalactic distances. So the expanding universe wouldn't move the Earth away from the Sun.

Also, we don't observe the Earth moving away from the Sun, and we don't observe the Earth's diameter increasing.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 02:03 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

And, even if (for some reason) the Earth did move further from the sun, it wouldn't affect the Earth's self-gravity.

Welcome to BAUT, tomsolomon. You might want to check out the Question and Answer section for astronomy questions, but you're right that "expanding Earth" arguments belong in this section.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 02:09 AM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

E=mc˛.........
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 03:10 AM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

The basic scientific pricipals, and common sense state, that the Earth at some time in its early life should have been covered completely in water.
Forgive my naivity, but I would have thought that this simple fact would have been obvious the most experienced of minds.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 03:21 AM
Hornblower's Avatar
Hornblower Hornblower is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
Posts: 1,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
The basic scientific pricipals, and common sense state, that the Earth at some time in its early life should have been covered completely in water.
Forgive my naivity, but I would have thought that this simple fact would have been obvious the most experienced of minds.
Common sense tells me that we cannot know one way or the other, in the absence of information about the original amount of water and the lumpiness of the surface.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 09:56 AM
Acolyte Acolyte is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
The basic scientific pricipals, and common sense state, that the Earth at some time in its early life should have been covered completely in water.
Forgive my naivity, but I would have thought that this simple fact would have been obvious the most experienced of minds.
I don't know about this idea being commonsense. By the time the Earth was cool enough to allow water to condense & form liquid pools on the surface, I think there would have been enough tectonic activity & also collisions from space in the early 'dirty' solar system, for there to be rises, shallows & deeps - ie. the water would have collected in the lowest points leaving quite a bit of solid surface clear.

Add to that the ongoing evaporation/condensation cycle & I don't think it's quite so 'commonsense.'

Just my opinion.
__________________
* Never doubt there is Truth; just doubt that you have it!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:15 AM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Hi tomsolomon, and welcome ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
I have an O'level in chemistry. Thats it. No PHD no years of exerience, nothing realy. Ive been reading a bit on this, tonight for the first time. And to me it makes perfect sense.......... Please read on.
I dont know about physics, I'm not even quite sure how an internal combustion engine works, but what I do know is that if you take a gas and cool it, it condenses, (becomes liquid, I think. There you go thats about the extent of my knowlege.)
OK ... you've revealed that your education is limited ... and your knowledge is limited (eg, not all gases become liquids when cooled - it is also pressure-dependent, something that you should have picked up in Chemistry class) ...

Quote:
This being the case......
If earth was created Billions of years ago, soley of gasses and stardust, with the aid of gravity, it would have eventually created a mass yes (the Earth) surrounded by gases (Y/N?).
Not really - "stardust" and gas, yes ... but also a lot of ices ... and the process of planetary accretion also included objects which of themselves comprised considerable mass ... the early gaseous envelope (sometimes called the first atmosphere) was thought to have been lost ...

Quote:
We are told that the "universe" is expanding, along with our galaxy, therefore the Earth is moving away from the Sun right?
These two are not connected in the way you think - as I understand it (which is hardly at all) universal expansion does not apply at scales of galaxies; certainly not at planetary distances ... shifts in the orbital distance of the Earth/Moon around the Sun are related to perturbing effects on gravity, with minor influences due to changes in mass over time ... the net effect is infinitesimal, and not always in the same direction (ie, the Earth/Moon system is not always moving away from the Sun) ...

Quote:
Eventually these gases surronding the earth would have condensed, to create a liquid covering the entire Earth. (Y/N?) (basic laws of chemistry and physics).
You might want to check those basic laws - there are quite a lot of gases which have not condensed to create a liquid ... you're breathing some of them ... certainly, a lot (but not all) of the water vapour condensed out, and yes, the primordial ocean was thought to have covered at least 90% of the surface of the Earth - it covers roughly 70% now ...

Quote:
If the continual movement of the Earth moving away from the Sun caused a reduction in gravity then the Earth Would expand causing rifts in the upper crust allowing the liquid to subside, and the land mass to reveal itself.
The Earth's position in relation to the Sun has virtually no bearing on the Earth's gravity - the best you can expect is a reduction in solar tides ... the reduction of ocean surface coverage is not caused by an expanding Earth - it was caused by a contracting Earth (I bet that raised your eyebrows), a cooling Earth (if you want some basic chemistry and physics, there it is ...), and by a collection of processes which we can call plate tectonics, which includes rifting, but also includes orogenies and subduction - neither of which can be explained by an expanding Earth ...

Quote:
Please tell me if I am talking from my BUTT, but if this is not a reasonable hypothesis then it goes against the laws of chemistry and phisics in my understanding.
perhaps you need to improve your understanding of both chemistry and physics, and toss in a little geology and planetary evolution ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:22 AM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

Another thing that concerns me is the fact that some believe there was a single land mass on one side of the planet.
Ok lets take a car wheel for instance.
If you do not balance a car wheel correctly when you travel along the wheel wobbles, and at speed in some cases, quite severly. Surely this cause the Earth to traverse around the Sun in a spiraling orbit.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:39 AM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
Another thing that concerns me is the fact that some believe there was a single land mass on one side of the planet.
Ok lets take a car wheel for instance.
If you do not balance a car wheel correctly when you travel along the wheel wobbles, and at speed in some cases, quite severly. Surely this cause the Earth to traverse around the Sun in a spiraling orbit.

While there are factors which cause the Earth to "wobble" on its axis, the placement of continental masses is likely to be the least of them ...

It's common to think of continental masses as these incredibly huge unwieldy objects which must upset the planet - it doesn't matter how many times we are told that, at comparable scales, the Earth is smoother than a billiard ball, it remains unbelievable because we can see a mountain that rises five miles into the air, but we can't see that the centre of the Earth is 6000 miles away ... it doesn't matter that the continents are the least dense components of the solid Earth, because rocks are so heavy ...

If you shaved all the hair from one side of your body, would you have to compensate for that, or would you lose your balance and tip over?
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #11 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:47 AM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cran View Post
If you shaved all the hair from one side of your body, would you have to compensate for that, or would you lose your balance and tip over?
Thats quite a bad analogy realy. Would it be fairer to say "If you took all the liquid from one side of your body would it affect you balance?"
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:57 AM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
Thats quite a bad analogy realy. Would it be fairer to say "If you took all the liquid from one side of your body would it affect you balance?"
you believe that the continents are about 40% of the mass of the Earth?


actually my analogy was still overstating the relative impact ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #13 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 05:22 PM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

Ok many thanks for clearing up a bit for me. Just a couple more things though.
Nibiru... Does it in fact exist?
According to Mayan history we are near the end of a epoch denoted by the end of the cycle of the Mayan calander. Could these two events be connected and how will the lining up of the galaxy, and possibly (speculation) the movement of a large interstellar body passing through or solar system, affect the state of the planet.
Armaggedon does not realy interest me, but I was just curious as to whether these events would have any affect and would they be noticeable?
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 05:39 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
According to Mayan history we are near the end of a epoch denoted by the end of the cycle of the Mayan calander.
Ding!

Be right back...

Edit: Back.

Please review the articles in the topics in this list, and do let us know what aspects of the year 2012 predictions we at BAUT Forum have so far failed to address.
  1. 2003 no, 2012 si
  2. 2012
  3. End of Mayan Calendar
  4. Pole shift / Planetary alignment 2012?
  5. 2012 alignment question
  6. about the Mayan 2012 item
  7. 2012 Debunking?
  8. Possible asteroid impact in 2012?
  9. 2012 asteroid?
  10. We don't have to worry about 2012!
  11. More on 2012 from India Daily
  12. 2012 Completion of conspiracy?
  13. Here's what's REALLY going to happen in 2012...
  14. crop circles, Planet X and 2012
  15. Planet X, crop circles and 2012 cataclysma
  16. According to the Mayans, what will happen on 23rd Dec. 2012?
  17. More 2012 Nonsense
  18. NEO 2012?
  19. Dangerous NEO in 2012?
  20. Christmas 2012
  21. 2012 mayan calender end of world
  22. Regarding the supposed polar shift/new ice age in 2012
  23. New 2012 threat?
  24. 2012 look at this thing on the sun
  25. Russian Expert Predicts Global Cooling from 2012
  26. Pole shift idea origins
  27. Dec 20 2012
  28. 2012 Stuff
  29. Horizon Project-New End of World Scare?
  30. Date: December 21st 2012
  31. Earth passing thru Galactic center in 2012 - didn't that already happen?
  32. 2012: What do you think well happen (if anything)
  33. So what will we see in 2012?
  34. Galactic Tsunami?
  35. Plane of the ecliptic of the galaxy?
  36. Earth's Magnetic Field & 2012
  37. 2012?
  38. Any truth to this?
  39. How can the sun be aligned with Galactic centre?
  40. the whole 2012 poles flip nonsense
  41. Planet X Official Advertisement
  42. What year are we in
  43. Quick question about the sun
  44. Galactic Alignment
  45. Books of 2012! -
  46. 2007 = 2012
  47. Return of Planet X By Rand
  48. Don Alejandro - Mayan Elder.
  49. Toutatis 4179: 2012?
  50. Galactic Alignment in 2012 ?
  51. Solar Storms
  52. A real prediction!
  53. NIBURU - Brown Dwarf, The DESTROYER
  54. 2012 Galactic Alignment
  55. Not 2012 again! But I cant help it~
  56. New evidence for 2012 TEOTWAWKI!!!
  57. this may be a silly question but...
  58. Just to know if this is true
  59. Just Wondering...
  60. Planet X/Nibiru, is it real?
  61. Youv heard this a million times.
  62. Nibaru or Planet X
  63. Mayan calendar
  64. 2012 Article?
  65. can i say something please on planet x
  66. Nibiru
  67. The growing earth.... :P

Thanks!
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

Last edited by 01101001; 16-May-2008 at 06:06 PM..
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 10:51 PM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
Ok many thanks for clearing up a bit for me. Just a couple more things though.
Nibiru... Does it in fact exist?
According to Mayan history we are near the end of a epoch denoted by the end of the cycle of the Mayan calander. Could these two events be connected and how will the lining up of the galaxy, and possibly (speculation) the movement of a large interstellar body passing through or solar system, affect the state of the planet.
Armaggedon does not realy interest me, but I was just curious as to whether these events would have any affect and would they be noticeable?
Well, this is a very different topic ...
and well covered elsewhere, I believe (and 01101001 just illustrated) ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #16 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:29 PM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

The old addage is obviously true then....
It only takes one time.
One post and already I'm in the Troll hall of fame.
Very interesting reading if your paraniod or smoke lots of pot.
Unfortunately I'm not in either of those catagories, I was a little premature in voicing my opinions, (maybe I should have done a little reading beforehand. But who reads the instructions before playing with the toy.
My appologies for getting off on the wrong foot, I will think twice before putting it in my mouth again.
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:38 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
The old addage is obviously true then....
It only takes one time.
One post and already I'm in the Troll hall of fame.
To be fair, it was more than one.
Quote:
My appologies for getting off on the wrong foot, I will think twice before putting it in my mouth again.
Apology accepted. Welcome to BAUT!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 11:44 PM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 2,231
Default

As for the expanding-Earth idea, look for nearly any thread started by ExpErdMann, our resident expanding-Earth proponent.

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 12:36 AM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

All else aside, what I am realy curious about is the way sound affects things. I know from personal experience, listening to music can cause a curious effect on the body, whether it be chemical or spiritual, nothing else I have experienced in life can produce anything near this experience (not even narcotics).
They can't hear you scream in space, is a fair enogh assumption, but what about white noise? And I did read something somewhere about string theory. These would sort of suggest that sound of some sort (maybe beyond our reconing) has some influence on our reality.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 02:37 AM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
All else aside, what I am realy curious about is the way sound affects things. I know from personal experience, listening to music can cause a curious effect on the body, whether it be chemical or spiritual, nothing else I have experienced in life can produce anything near this experience (not even narcotics).
They can't hear you scream in space, is a fair enogh assumption, but what about white noise? And I did read something somewhere about string theory. These would sort of suggest that sound of some sort (maybe beyond our reconing) has some influence on our reality.
again, this is a very different topic ...
and, if you want people who have an interest in string theory (and vibrations), rather than people who have an interest in planetary science, to respond, I'd suggest framing this post as a question in a new thread ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #21 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2008, 06:14 PM
punkrockbong151's Avatar
punkrockbong151 punkrockbong151 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: glen allen, virginia
Posts: 79
Send a message via AIM to punkrockbong151 Send a message via MSN to punkrockbong151 Send a message via Yahoo to punkrockbong151
Default

actually, reading from another post on this site a while ago, we are getting closer to the sun

and doesn't this whole condensing work for all gases, i've never had the thought to ask if all gases have a liquid form (now that i think about it i geuss they'd have to)

and if they condensed it would be a slow (because we're not moving closer by much) and it would just rain down (if my question about all the gases having a liquid form holds water)
__________________
SAO <3's S.C.W.
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 02:12 AM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by punkrockbong151 View Post
actually, reading from another post on this site a while ago, we are getting closer to the sun

and doesn't this whole condensing work for all gases, i've never had the thought to ask if all gases have a liquid form (now that i think about it i geuss they'd have to)

and if they condensed it would be a slow (because we're not moving closer by much) and it would just rain down (if my question about all the gases having a liquid form holds water)
Again - not all gases pass through a liquid phase when cooled; because pressure is also a factor ...

example 1. Carbon dioxide normally passes from gas-solid (or solid-gas); liquid CO2 needs about 5atm pressure ...

example 2. at something like 0.15atm, water does not have a liquid phase ...

(note: someone may want to correct the figures - I didn't look them up)
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #23 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 01:10 PM
Acolyte Acolyte is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 429
Default

Just a point to give some idea about the size of Earth. The crust (the bit we live on plus what's under the seas) varies a bit in thickness - from about 25 miles to maybe 60 or so. Under that there's the mantle (there's an upper & lower mantle) then outer core & inner core. The core has a radius of over 2100 miles & it's iron, heavily compressed due to the mass of Earth. (ie. it weighs a lot)
The Earth is about 7900 miles diameter at the equator. So, the 'skin' of the Earth, the part that would purportedly throw the earth into a wobble, is the floating bit (ie. lighter part) at the surface & it's 2% or less of the diameter.

So Gondwanaland is feasible without necessarily throwing the Earth into terminal wobbles. Imagine having a spinning orange with some mould on one side - would the mould actually destabilise the orange?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon
All else aside, what I am realy curious about is the way sound affects things. I know from personal experience, listening to music can cause a curious effect on the body, whether it be chemical or spiritual, nothing else I have experienced in life can produce anything near this experience (not even narcotics).
They can't hear you scream in space, is a fair enogh assumption, but what about white noise? And I did read something somewhere about string theory. These would sort of suggest that sound of some sort (maybe beyond our reconing) has some influence on our reality.
What music does to the mind would seem to be a very different subject to either what you can hear in space or whether strings actually make a sound as they vibrate.

If a scream can't be heard in space, how would one hear white noise? There is no difference (apart from means of production) & neither has the medium to transport it.

If strings make music, it is unlikely they do it solely in 3D space & quite possibly we can't hear it due to the frequency - humans hear a pathetically small range of Sounds, just as we see a pathetically small range of frequencies of Light.

It would help if you asked a question & stuck with it for a time, maybe discussing & contributing to the evolution of the thread rather than changing from one thing to another without proper response to what has been offered.

You'd also get better response if you asked each subject in it's own thread - there are those here who would probably contribute on the music question but they don't see it - they see a thread called 'The Growing Earth' & pass right on by.
__________________
* Never doubt there is Truth; just doubt that you have it!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 01:32 PM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acolyte View Post
Just a point to give some idea about the size of Earth. The crust (the bit we live on plus what's under the seas) varies a bit in thickness - from about 25 miles to maybe 60 or so. Under that there's the mantle (there's an upper & lower mantle) then outer core & inner core. The core has a radius of over 2100 miles & it's iron, heavily compressed due to the mass of Earth. (ie. it weighs a lot)
The Earth is about 7900 miles diameter at the equator. So, the 'skin' of the Earth, the part that would purportedly throw the earth into a wobble, is the floating bit (ie. lighter part) at the surface & it's 2% or less of the diameter...
I'm curious to know where you get these numbers from ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #25 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 02:02 PM
tomsolomon tomsolomon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Default

Also, the Earth is the only planet in our solar system to have a fragmented crust, other planets show evidence of volcanic activity, but they have a singular unbroken upper crust. Just what I've viewed on documentaries, if this is right? As I said I'm an observer not a researcher.
My appologies I will start a seperate thread for the string post.
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 03:14 PM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsolomon View Post
Also, the Earth is the only planet in our solar system to have a fragmented crust, other planets show evidence of volcanic activity, but they have a singular unbroken upper crust. Just what I've viewed on documentaries, if this is right?
Well, let's disregard the four largest planets, and concentrate on those bodies in the solar system which have definable solid surfaces ...

what do you mean by fragmented crust and singular unbroken upper crust?

As far as I know, surface studies of Mercury have barely begun, but there are indications of crustal fractures and structural shifts ...

Venus has anything but an unbroken upper crust ...

Mars has two distinct surface types, analogous to continental and oceanic crust forms on Earth ... as does the Moon, Ganymede, Titan, and possibly others ...

Europa seems to be completely covered in ice, but even that is fragmented ... Io is so active and covered with debris that we can't really tell ...

Some of the outer satellites have been so fragmented that they look like crazy paving ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

  #27 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 07:18 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 8,520
Default

Because Tectonic activity has ceased on a planet like Mars doesn't mean it was never there.
__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 09:42 PM
Acolyte Acolyte is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cran View Post
I'm curious to know where you get these numbers from ...
Google - one site was http://www.enchantedlearning.com/sub...h/Inside.shtml & another was http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/lo.../interior.html. Also looked at http://geography.about.com/od/learna...earthfacts.htm
__________________
* Never doubt there is Truth; just doubt that you have it!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2008, 10:47 PM
Fortis Fortis is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cran View Post
Again - not all gases pass through a liquid phase when cooled; because pressure is also a factor ...

example 1. Carbon dioxide normally passes from gas-solid (or solid-gas); liquid CO2 needs about 5atm pressure ...

example 2. at something like 0.15atm, water does not have a liquid phase ...

(note: someone may want to correct the figures - I didn't look them up)
Just for fun, you may enjoy knowing that liquid helium does not have a solid phase at 1atm pressure, no matter how much you cool it.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 20-May-2008, 12:17 AM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,742
Default

hmm ... OK ... thanks for that ...

it seems I confused miles/km in an earlier post ...

but 25 - 60 miles for crust is not supported by any of those sites ...
the first one mentions 6 - 90 km (~ 4 - 54 miles), though doesn't indicate where the 90km bit might be ...
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Big Blow to the Growing Earth “Theory”.. Nano Against the Mainstream 16 13-October-2007 09:05 PM
Galileo Was Wrong Tohu Against the Mainstream 1033 21-November-2006 12:02 AM
Earth's axes shifted, what does this mean? EX Astronomy 50 11-January-2005 09:40 PM
Link(s) About Why We Are Alone Bill Thmpson Against the Mainstream 244 11-July-2004 01:03 AM
Planet-X or Niburu, Nibiru, Nemesis or Marduk - hoax teegeeack Against the Mainstream 12 23-June-2003 02:28 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today