Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Against the Mainstream
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2008, 05:11 PM
hernari hernari is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 1
Question Double Slit Experiment

Hello, thank you ahead of time to anyone who reads and comments. I love these boards, but I have never posted before.

I read this on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
“Returning again to electrons, when electrons are fired one at a time through a double-slit apparatus they do not cluster around two single points directly on lines between the emitter and the two slits, but instead one by one they fill in the same old interference pattern with which we have now become quite familiar.”

The electrons fired in this experiment travel at the speed of light correct?

Isn’t it correct that anything traveling the speed of light does not experience time?

We experience time, so the electrons appear to us to be firing one at a time.

What if electrons fired one at a “time” do not experience time; therefore they behave as if fired all at once?

Please, be gentle
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 10:33 AM
papageno's Avatar
papageno papageno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Saxony
Posts: 3,236
Send a message via MSN to papageno
Default

Welcome to the BAUT forum.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hernari View Post
The electrons fired in this experiment travel at the speed of light correct?
No, the electrons do not move at the speed of light.

However, the single-particle interference in a double-slit experiment has been observed with photons, which do move at the speed of light.

Such experiments have been performed on all sorts of particles, from electrons and photons up to molecules.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hernari View Post
Isn’t it correct that anything traveling the speed of light does not experience time?

We experience time, so the electrons appear to us to be firing one at a time.

What if electrons fired one at a “time” do not experience time; therefore they behave as if fired all at once?
This is all based on your assumption that the particles move at the speed of light.
But since these experiments work as expected with particles that move at lower speeds, your idea does not work for them.

As a matter of experimental fact, whether the particles move at the speed of light or not, does not affect the outcome of the experiment, because the single-particle interference is the consequence of the quantum nature of the particles.

But, wouldn't your question be more appropriate to the Q&A forum...?
__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 10:41 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hernari View Post
What if electrons fired one at a “time” do not experience time; therefore they behave as if fired all at once?

Please, be gentle
I see where you're going with this, but as papageno points out, electrons do not move at the speed of light. They have mass, so cannot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by papageno View Post
As a matter of experimental fact, whether the particles move at the speed of light or not, does not affect the outcome of the experiment, because the single-particle interference is the consequence of the quantum nature of the particles.
Wouldn't that be a consequence of their wave nature?
Quote:
But, wouldn't your question be more appropriate to the Q&A forum...?
It appears that the OP intended to draw an ATM conclusion.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 11:02 AM
papageno's Avatar
papageno papageno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Saxony
Posts: 3,236
Send a message via MSN to papageno
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhEb09'1 View Post
Wouldn't that be a consequence of their wave nature?
Not entirely.
The interesting feature of the experiment is that the quantum particles interact with the screen with particle-like properties (little dots appear one at a time), and only after a while the interference pattern becomes apparent.
If you had just a wave going through the system, then the interference pattern would be observed from the beginning.

This experiment shows very nicely the quantum nature of the particles, because you get both the particle-like and the wave-like behavior.





[Would I be right in thinking that this is my kilopi post...?]
__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 11:14 AM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,974
Default

I agree that it's a function of their wave nature. Electrons have a very strong kinship with photons. After all, it's the excited electron which emits a photon when it moves from it's excited orbital to it's base orbital. It's only natural that they might share some properties.

I wasn't aware, however, that electons exhibited the same properties with the dual-slit experiment as did photons (color me ignorant). Can anyone verify that this is indeed the case?
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that.

I am human. Fully human.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 11:37 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papageno View Post
Not entirely.
The interesting feature of the experiment is that the quantum particles interact with the screen with particle-like properties (little dots appear one at a time), and only after a while the interference pattern becomes apparent.
O I agree that that is definitely the most interesting part of the experiment!

I was just commenting on "the single-particle interference is the consequence of the quantum nature of the particles"
Quote:
[Would I be right in thinking that this is my kilopi post...?]
Next post! The first instance of kilopi on BABB/BAUT, in a post of ToSeek.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 11:54 AM
papageno's Avatar
papageno papageno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Saxony
Posts: 3,236
Send a message via MSN to papageno
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens
I agree that it's a function of their wave nature. Electrons have a very strong kinship with photons. After all, it's the excited electron which emits a photon when it moves from it's excited orbital to it's base orbital. It's only natural that they might share some properties.
It has nothing to do with the fact that electrons and photons interact. It has to do with the fact that both photons and electrons are quantum particles, and as such their state is mathematically a wave-function.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens
I wasn't aware, however, that electons exhibited the same properties with the dual-slit experiment as did photons (color me ignorant). Can anyone verify that this is indeed the case?
You have never seen the cheesy 70s educational movie: single electron interference ?

These experiments have been done with a lot of different type of particles, up to atoms and molecules, and in different media (such as semiconductors).



Quote:
Originally Posted by hhEb09'1
I was just commenting on "the single-particle interference is the consequence of the quantum nature of the particles"
Ah, I see what you mean.




[So... this must be my kilopi post, right?]
__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2008, 12:09 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papageno View Post
[So... this must be my kilopi post, right?]
Fireworks!
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Two-slit Experiment With Electrons Owen217a Questions and Answers 3 07-November-2007 09:40 PM
More precise orbital simulation program grav Astronomy 225 13-May-2007 06:30 AM
Gedanken Experiment MentalAvenger Against the Mainstream 118 02-February-2007 11:04 PM
In the antigravitational experiment time sometimes pauses Zhang Xu Against the Mainstream 0 13-October-2006 11:31 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today