Originally Posted by RussT

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

I looked for the "History" of Super nova Types and couldn't find anything clearly dilineating how and 'when' types 1b and 1c were introduced.

AND, it looks to me, from this wiki article that 1b's and 1c's are both concidered Long GRB's.

I also remember seeing somewhere (Couldn't find it) where you wrote something to the effect that GRB's were probably NOT stars at all, so you basically said...if they aren't stars, then what the heck are they.



[The greatest gamma ray events are not known to be associated with supernova of any kind.]

Yes, this is true....and the reality is that NONE of the Long 3 second to 500 second GRB's are!

[I don't know that anyone has a working model...inside or outside the realm of known physics.]

I do, BUT you just won't believe that SMBH's really exist...

[I would like to know much more about the actual distance to gamma ray events, ]

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0406210
Directly from the paper;


AND, they just find the nearest (line of site) galaxy, and "Putatively" put the GRB in it.

AND here is an additional "Key" to the papers on SN2006gy....buried in several of those papers, is one line saying something to the effect...we observed X Ray flux that was NOT being "Obsorbed", but we really don't know why that is...

If it was "IN" the galaxy, the Xray 'obsorbtion' would be there.

Originally Posted by RussT

for 3 + years I have modeled an 'open system', where I am saying that energy is 'coming into our universe', and "New galaxies" are being created...Guess what....I am NOT a QSSC advocate......they do NOT believe that Black Holes or singularities of any type are real, NOR do they believe that Non-baryonic DM is needed for galaxy rotation curves.

I believe that SMBH/Stellar Black Holes are 'real', and that there is a 'Singularity' (Ring) that can be shown to account for how our 'space' 'gets here'...

Neither am I a PU or EU advocate...they may have a few things that can apply, BUT as soon as they take it "Global"...it's over.

SO, with that said, and this is the first time I am showing this...

I had already determined, based on supposed 'curvature of space'/the bowling ball on the meshed sheet, in the solar system, that IF 'space' were actually curved like that, to allow the planets to 'fall' on their curved geodesics, that the curvature we see of 'light from a distant star' around a massive body (Star), should be MUCH farther out from the massive body.

In other words, IF the curvature of space is causing all the planets to follow that curvature, then we should see light being curved much farther away from the sun than we do...has anyone ever done that kind of calc?

Gravity ONLY works very close to massive bodies...Hence the correct calcs of GR for Mercury, the moon, and close Binaries.

SO, yes, I am saying that the Sun creates a magnetic field that goes all the way to the Heliopause, and holds the planets in their orbits, and that the SMBH does the same for the disc of each galaxy.

SO, what needs to be understood, for the solar plane/eliptical is that the entire solar system is made up of Non-baryonic DM/Neutrinos, that is 'metalicity', traveling at "c" in all/every direction...and that the CMBR 2.73k energy is in each Neutrino. SO, each planet, that is not in a perfect cirular orbit, is given a slight 'sling shot' effect when it gets to that special place.

That is what allows the magnetic field to propagate.

Try this....If gravity is gravity is gravity, and everything is just following it's geodesics, Try doing a Gravity Assist/Sling shot effect,,,,,,,,,,,going the opposite way of a planets spin...