I am offering something new to science: the changing of Earth’s velocity has an influence on tide, weather and people’s psychology.
It is citing the Kalashnikov gun instance. It is calculated that the bullet during its way out from the stem of gun has the energy of 2020 J, and the gun itself has 5 J. This is known in science. The new ones is inclosing in following: the Law of Pulse(Conservation of Momentum) is acting until the bullet and the gun clash something. When the clashing both of the bullet and the gun with other objects, the center of system changes. This is against the Law of conservation of Momentum. I assure You that this issues were addressed to many PhD of science, who didn’t answer till now. The Law of conservation of Momentum and the Law of conservation of energy must be changed. Presently the science is against everyone who finds arguments that are disclaiming the Law of conservation of Momentum and the Law of conservation of energy and tries to occupy church’s place, as in the times of Copernicus, when the idea about rotation of the Earth was considered heresy.
You can examine the document by following reference: http://popusoileonid.narod.ru/index_eng.html

__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
Isaac Asimov

Please can you show us, with an equation or two, what it is that you mean?

It looks to me like he has realised the Earth-Moon barycentre orbits the Sun, not the COM of Earth itself.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_...r_in_astronomy)

Then there are misunderstandings about force and mass.

This is then extrapolated into the cause of, other stuff.

__________________
Measure once. Cut twice. Power tools are fun.

There are finer details, but even the gross ones are greatly exaggerated. The path of the earth is shown as alternately concave and convex, moving about the center of mass of the earth/moon, but not only does that not happen for the earth, it doesn't even happen for the moon. Both the earth path and moon path about the sun is concave towards the sun, even as the moon weaves in and out about the earth.

Little appreciated piece of trivia.

Welcome to BAUT Leo P.

For about two years I worked on an idea that joined relativity and quantum together. Science says we are particles and I took a stab at saying what if we are connected in time like a bend in a piece of string.

Back in the early days of physics Einstein said the power is in the particles and Tesla said it is between the particles and for both to be right the particle needs to be a tube. That way inside the tube power can be between the ends and inside the tube. It is a bit like in the movie "Donny Darko" where if you could see yourself a few seconds ahead in time there would be a shape of yourself moving before you do it.

The simplest shape for a tube is a doughnut or called a torus because there is no end bits. The idea is the proton that is going to get smashed is a bit like a hose and we experience this now at a bend for the proton. Think of a hose bent at right angles and the bubbled out bit is the proton we see in our now. It still looks like a ball shape to us because we do not see the future bit or the past bit.

Anyway the idea was not looked at because although it agrees that relativity and quantum should be getting all the results they are getting it has the effect of reversing all of science and then adding quite a lot more. So for that I am the one way past the fringe, well too far off to be listened to anyway. The problem I have is that it wont be until Geneva is sucked into a hole that the idea might be taken more seriously and of course that is a bit too late isn't it.

Scientists being the brainy people they are want it all in mathematics and as I keep saying I am just a cleaner I came to the scientists to ask them for help with the mathematics. Anyway that was the idea, worked for dark matter and dark energy explanation too. Wonderful world isn't it ... for trying to help you get called way past the fringe. Now for the first time we live on a planet that may or may not survive science. It is not like I am the devil or the antichrist, just a person who cares that nobody should get hurt.

Michael.

Anyway is the pulse idea a conservation of energy applied over time like the movement of the Antarctic for ten minutes every twelve hours? I look for similarities on scales. The energy release is over the ice field is the equivalent of a magnitude seven earthquake but released over ten minutes and not the usual ten seconds as an earthquake would be. I will admit I am trying to draw a comparison to the beam in the particle accelerator being built exceeding the safe limit of pulse as the time is reduced from the initial 75 n sec down to 25 n sec as the experiment ramps up.

The regular members here from mainstream science are right in that if you do not provide mathematics to be attacked then the topic wont go too far.

__________________
"Nature is obliged to let reality determine its laws, whereas mathematics is under no such constraint."

There's no real problem joining QM & SR together. It's been done with great success, e.g. QED.

If you don't provide some meaningful mathematics, any discussion is usually like nailing jelly to a wall.

For example he finds a problem with the laws of conservation of energy and of conservation of momentum. These are pretty simple bits of mathematics. The least he can do is show why he thinks they are problematic.

That reference in the OP looks like pseudoscientific junk, crudely translated from Russian into English.

The line of thought involving the gun, the bullet, the shooter and the target reminded me of a car salesman who tried to flimflam me into believing that a loan would cost me only half as much as withdrawing money from a savings account that paid the same interest rate the lender would have charged. His math was incomplete.

Possibly.