|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Maybe your eyes are getting better at recognizing it. I don't think the distance we travel in a year would make any difference.
And no, we won't cross the galaxy center in 2012. Our solar system never goes through it.
__________________
As above, so below |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin "Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson Meet the OOONG TOE. |
|
||||
|
Yes the solar system does cross through the galactic plain... but not in 2012, or any time soon. this sort of movement takes thousands of years. In your lifetime it would be nearly impossible to measure any movement visible. I refer to this as progression, but except that, that may not be the term widely used.
As to your question regarding apparent brightness... I would assume atmospheric conditions have changed since you last studied the sky.. Like bush fires in Indonesia, or volcanoes in the Philippines...There are a lot of reasons why your sky might look clearer than last year. Enjoy it. It may not last. From my vantage point the milky way covers the whole sky... and is often mistaken for a cloud. But this is because I live in New Zealand. |
|
||||
|
Our galactic orbital motion is roughly toward Cygnus, but the numerous stars that we see massed as the Milky Way are orbiting the same way. We are chasing them but not gaining on them. Even if we were gaining on them, the motion is too slow for us to see any change in one year.
Forget that year 2012 stuff. There has been a lot of hocus pocus, egged on in part by an artifact of the Mayan calendar. |
|
||||
|
I'm pretty sure the answer is among these, some of the threads concerning the inconsequential year 2012 (and related web articles):
Bad Astronomy Blog: 2012, the year nothing will happen Universe Today: 2012: No Planet X Universe Today: 2012: Planet X is not Nibiru Universe Today: 2012: No Killer Solar Flare
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
It may be because you are living in an area with less light pollution than you were last year, are having clearer weather this year, or are giving your eyes more time to become "dark-adapted".
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. |
|
||||
|
I tried to reply on friday and it didn't replied. I clicked "Post Quick Reply" then I got message in the next page saying something like" I'll have to wait for the moderator to approve my post to reply in this thread". Something is problem with me being new to this board?
Anyway, respond to Cougar, I never smoke weed. Thanks for everyones inputs! The sky might be more clear but I swear it's getting brighter than ever. Or maybe my eyes are playing tricks on me. I usually go outside for one hour to memorizes stars for several past years. I just enjoyed looking up the sky at the night time. It's full of mystery. I also have dreams about the Orion's belt. It was unreal. I, for one, believe that our solar system is going to enter galactic center in 2012. Don't quote on that. If nothing ever happens, that will be good. |
|
||||
|
I know. That is just my predict. I have my own theory. Again, I do not want that ever happens to this earth.
astromark, I forget to add.. thats cool! the milky way lit up sky in the southwest from where I live. It look like light white cloud but it actually is milky way. I was thinking that the milky way would covers the sky in Australia. I'd love to see that! Thanks for sharing infomation. anymore inputs would be great! |
|
||||
|
Please don't use the Questions and Answers section to promote your non-mainstream hypothesis.
Take it to Against the Mainstream.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
27000 light years?In 4 years?We would have to move at 6750x light speed. Sorry, but this just ain't gonna happen, besides, a theory in science is a well tested interpretations of FACTS and supported by evidence, not "just a theory" as in common speech, meaning an educated guess, that's named a hypothesis in science. And about this 2012 stuff, come on, it's just made up garbage.All these stupid conspiracy theories about how smart the ancients were are nonsense.They were smart, but they did not have the tools to predict any galactic catastrophes. This is just as silly as if I predicted the end of the world based on the end of our calendar, because on december 31 it ENDS!Get your tinfoil hats! Anybody can make up stuff like this. Maybe some mesolithic African tribe predicted that the world was going to be devoured by a giant lion in 2000 B.C.So what? And we know on which orbit are we, and it is never near the center of the Galaxy (first letter capitalised as it's OUR Galaxy).
__________________
|
|
||||
|
This thread is about if anyone think that milky way seem brighter. I was just asking if our solar system is gonna cross galactic center. Many of you says no. Ok, I got it. I am one of these who believe in 2012. Like I said, do not quote on me about 2012. I want my thread to be stay open and not lock. Thanks.
![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Being generous for some reason, I haven't removed your thread and banned you entirely. You CANNOT post way-outside-the-box stuff like this in the mainstream Question & Answers section. Now, I have moved it to the ATM section, which means for the thread to stay open as much as 30 days, you'll need to defend your position about 2012. Failure to reply will result in early closing, and failure to provide new materials not already covered in the many existing threads on this subject will result in early closure.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's still open. But, it seems to have been moved to where you can more comfortably make claims that are out of the mainstream -- even if they are just about your unsupported beliefs. Have at it. Here, though, you are expected, required, to support your claims, so don't make them if you can't back them up with persuasive evidence and logic -- or admissions of your not knowing why you happen to think your claims are true. So, what particular predictions about the year 2012 do you believe to be true? And, why?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But, I would be curious what exactly you believe about 2012, and why.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong? Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability. The Leif Ericson Cruiser |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I hope it's why a lot of people don't bother posting their antiscience beliefs in BAUT Forum.
There are more appropriate places for that sort of thing on the Web, places where the members care little about skepticism and science, where astrology is more valued than astronomy. Gatorain, feel free to back up your claims, if you're convinced they are true. Don't let mcbain discourage you. === Edit: Just reminded myself... From the front page: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... Last edited by 01101001; 25-August-2008 at 02:07 AM.. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
McBain, I have a question for you: Are you able to handle being wrong? Let's take a look. If I posted on here that I could drive, in a Jeep Grand Cherokee from New York to Los Angeles in 20 mins, the "worlds greatest minds" would not only "beat me with their keyboards" but they would also be perfectly in the right to do so. Your post sums up the attitude of many ATM'ers who post thinking that they shouldn't actually have to Back Up or support their claims with hard things like Math and Science. Nonsense. If Gatorain can provide sufficient evidence to support his claims, the folks here will be happy to take a look. It doesn't mean everyone will suddenly become agreeable- but that's the nature of science, to investigate and hash it out. If a person cannot handle being corrected (Such as myself, I have had to learn how to handle correction) then they can either learn or do as you said to do. Your advice, however, seems very unproductive... |
|
||||
|
At least get his name right.. Besides, if Einstein were to post here, that fact by itself would definitely be ATM.
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin "Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson Meet the OOONG TOE. |
|
||||
|
So do I. And in fact, I believe in 2013 as well.
Why can't we quote you? Are you a famous scientist who might lose your job over this? But seriously, you're free to think what you want about 2012. If you want to believe there will be a big earthquake, be my guest - science can't tell you that it won't happen. Could a big volcano erupt? Absolutely. Could we get smashed into by a big asteroid? Yup, could happen. But could we cross the center of the galaxy? Absolutely not. Impossible.
__________________
As above, so below |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
-The Wolf http://www.ryanmercer.com http://www.youtube.com/user/ryanmercer317 http://www.pleasegodhelpme.org |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
But even so- As dynamic as the atmosphere is, there doesn't even need to be local events to cause haze. Global events- even from years before can cause haze off on the other side of the world... |
|
|||
|
It might be worthwhile to point out that Gatorain is confusing two different ideas. The reference to "galactic center" is probably just a mis-understanding of "galactic plane," which I gather we are to cross sometime soon. An easy mistake for someone not well-versed in the terminology, and worth educating. Some of the disparaging arguments might have been better directed toward education instead of sniping put-downs. There is sometimes just a hint of intellectual snobbery in the neighborhood, and I can't imagine that would be the purpose of these boards.
Last edited by thorkil2; 12-September-2008 at 04:28 PM.. Reason: misspelling |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Milky Way’s Galactic Core, Stellar “Paradox of Youth” | William | Astronomy | 32 | 08-June-2008 09:40 PM |
| New Milky Way Observations, Impact on Old and New Theories | William | Astronomy | 7 | 21-May-2008 04:22 AM |
| New Milky Way Satellites | Tim Thompson | Astronomy | 23 | 22-May-2006 06:36 PM |