I am cautious to use the word 'theory', but as my idea makes a prediction about the Sun, I think that it may classify it as a theory; although I 'm not sure whether the specific prediction would be testable, as the difference in measurement would very small, but never the less, it is a prediction, and the theory may be testable in the same manner, using a different body, maybe Jupiter.

This the google page with my theory on it;

http://tofunut.googlepages.com/gravitationlengthdilationtheory


There is some stuff about black holes in relation to this at the bottom too.

All of which I probably have mentioned on other parts of BAUT.


ETA: I'm not so sure about how it applies to black holes, on more consideration; as I'm not sure what g would be at varying distances from the middle of the ball, but it still applies, I feel, just that the black hole may not look as big.


ETA2: (re: black holes) have added that maybe g, and time dilation level out towards the middle of the collapsing, sphere.

I need to read this in more detail when I'm less tired because the problem looks interesting, but the first thing that jumped out at me was your use of d/t for calculating c. You are setting up a relativistic situation, but not using the mathematics of relativity. s=d/t doesn't apply in this situation. You have to include the Lorentz factor, √(1-(v/c)^2 ) in your calculations. For the moment, I'm burned out and headed for bed.

__________________
Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately, it kills all its pupils. Hector Berlioz

"To complete the picture all the photons can be seen to be synchronising friction on and off throughout the overall cone which itself is synchronised to the equal and opposite reaction of equilateral triangulation"... by a scientificator in ATM, too priceless to be lost to posterity.