PDA

View Full Version : Great Moon Hoax rebuttal by Dr. Paul Lowman


AstroMike
25-June-2002, 04:49 AM
http://edmall.gsfc.nasa.gov/aacps/news/Hoax.html

Check it out!!!! /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif

M_Welander
25-June-2002, 11:27 AM
After reading this article, I have one question to the members of this board:

A while ago, I asked here when we first realized that the lunar meteorites found in Antarctica actually are from the moon. The answer I got was "1969". However, this article claims we learned that first in "the early 1980s".

So... which is it?

Alan G. Archer
25-June-2002, 01:17 PM
On 2002-06-25 06:27, M_Welander wrote:
After reading this article, I have one question to the members of this board:

A while ago, I asked here when we first realized that the lunar meteorites found in Antarctica actually are from the moon. The answer I got was "1969". However, this article claims we learned that first in "the early 1980s".

So... which is it?


From http://epsc.wustl.edu/admin/resources/moon_meteorites.html:

Allan Hills 81005 (ALHA81005), the first meteorite to be recognized as originating from the Moon, was found during the 1981–82 ANSMET collection season, on 18 January 1982. The three Yamato 79xxx meteorites were collected earlier, but not recognized to be of lunar origin until after 1982. The first lunar meteorite to be found appears to be Yamato 791197, on 20 November 1979.

[Major edit...sorry.]

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Alan G. Archer on 2002-06-25 08:34 ]</font>

M_Welander
25-June-2002, 01:38 PM
Good. So now the question is how the HBs can still claim that lunar meteorites were used in the 60s to fake lunar rocks... /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

Time travel, anyone?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: M_Welander on 2002-06-25 08:39 ]</font>

DaveC
25-June-2002, 02:07 PM
On 2002-06-25 08:38, M_Welander wrote:
Good. So now the question is how the HBs can still claim that lunar meteorites were used in the 60s to fake lunar rocks... /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

Time travel, anyone?


You're just not thinking like a HB. The official story is that lunar meteorites weren't found 'til the '80s - but that's just a NASA fabrication to divert attention away from von Braun's successful meteorite collection jaunt to Antarctica in the late 1960s ('67 or '68 I think). If NASA can get all the world's geologists to say that metoeorites look like rocks collected on the moon, it's a minor deception to lie about when the meteorites were found and how much lunar material has actually been collected in Antarctica. Time travel not needed - thus freeing up funds for antigravity and vacuum chamber technology! /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif

M_Welander
25-June-2002, 02:35 PM
Ok, sure, but that still leaves one question unanswered:

If NASA found the lunar meteorites 15 years before they were officially found, how come no one else found them during that time? As far as I know, anyone can go to the Antarctica to look for meteorites - it's not like the continent is owned by NASA or anything.

Jim
25-June-2002, 02:48 PM
Well, y'see, ol' Werner found the first confirmed lunar meteorites during his little trip in the 60s.

He was so good at locating meteorites from the moon (Heck, he found over 850 pounds of 'em!) that he practically cleaned the place out. No one else was able to find another until the Japanese stumbled across one in 1979. (And it was probably discarded by Werner as sub-standard.)

Werner von Braun... rocket scientist, rock collector. What a dude!

kucharek
25-June-2002, 02:51 PM
As far as I know, anyone can go to the Antarctica to look for meteorites - it's not like the continent is owned by NASA or anything.

Are you sure Antarctica exists? Do you actually know one who has been there, someone you can really trust?
Show me a photograph of Antarctica and I'll proof it is faked /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif

Rift
25-June-2002, 03:54 PM
[/quote]
Are you sure Antarctica exists? Do you actually know one who has been there, someone you can really trust?
Show me a photograph of Antarctica and I'll proof it is faked /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif
[/quote]

Of COURSE Antarctica doesn't exist. What ARE you thinking??? There's a Huge Gaping Hole on BOTH poles that leads to a hollow earth full of Aliens and Space Nazis... Admiral Byrd was sent by the US government as an ambassador, don't you know anything??? /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_razz.gif

http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/enigma/enigmapart2.htm

BTW the main page http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm
May be my new favorite crank page. Somehow he goes from the sphinx being too old, through MJ-12 and ends up with a hollow earth and space nazis...

kucharek
25-June-2002, 04:12 PM
It seems to be impossible to invent new conspiracies...

Silas
25-June-2002, 04:18 PM
On 2002-06-25 11:12, kucharek wrote:
It seems to be impossible to invent new conspiracies...


Isn't that a new one in itself?

(Or is that what "THEY" want us to think?)

Silas

kucharek
25-June-2002, 07:51 PM
by pure coincidence I just saw at the tv how globes are produced.
And: The globes had at the south pole a big hole!!! Okay, they later covered it by putting a light bulb into the globe there, but this is surely just to cover the truth.
I'd say those guys are blowing the whistle since a long time, but until today I never saw!

/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif

Harald

PS: On a serius side, these guys have a neat, free floating globe.
http://www.columbus-verlag.de/Bilder/Art/Schwebe.jpg
Maybe using the same technique as NASA used for faking zero-g scenes. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif
SCNR

SeanF
25-June-2002, 08:11 PM
That's pretty cool, Kucharek . . . but where do I get one? Who are "these guys"? /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

(Hmm . . . looks like it doesn't float at a 23.5 degree angle, though . . .) /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif

Space Bandito
25-June-2002, 08:37 PM
http://www.columbus-verlag.de/englisch/home.html

*Edit* This link was in the image propertys.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Space Bandito on 2002-06-25 15:38 ]</font>